Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,167 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,678,196
Pageviews Today: 2,207,584Threads Today: 552Posts Today: 8,915
12:51 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject A digestive system is irrefutable proof that there is no loving god
Poster Handle Don'tBeAfraid
Post Content
How would you propose to grow cells without nourishment? This is kind of a ridiculous topic, but I'm willing to engage you. Have you studied any biology whatsoever, much less biochemistry? How could a being without cells have continuity of Self?

What are you proposing, beings of pure energy? Is that your litmus test for a proper creation by a benevolent god?

The differentiation of cells is what allows specialization of tissue to occur. That can't happen with nourishment.

Food is consumed by all life, even simple plants that use their roots to absorb nutrients from the soil.

Are you asking for a barren world devoid of the diversity of species? For without the array of creatures to live and die and so form soil or serve as nutrition for other species, there is no food chain.

Even if a being of energy were possible, how would it maintain cohesiveness? How would it grow? What would limit its growth if not bound?

The topic seems very ilogical.
 Quoting: Don'tBeAfraid


Surely a god with unlimited power over the universe can find a way to create a diverse amount of species that didn't involve the food chain? Or are you saying your god is limited?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11421136

Quite the contrary. I'm saying your idea is limited and illogical. You still haven't proposed a lifeform that didn't need nourishment. You didn't study Biology did you?

I'm quite surprised at some of the posts that literally whine about theoretical things, and yet don't pose a solution. In this case, this form of debate is academic as it's impossible to realize, and yet you fail to do the most basic aspects of debating as well as failing to enter into a dialectic with others. You merely complain. It's rather boring, but minorly amusing at 6 am to watch someone rail against what cannot be changed.

Would you like superpowers too? It's like talking to a child.
 Quoting: Don'tBeAfraid


How would you propose to grow cells without nourishment? This is kind of a ridiculous topic, but I'm willing to engage you. Have you studied any biology whatsoever, much less biochemistry? How could a being without cells have continuity of Self?

What are you proposing, beings of pure energy? Is that your litmus test for a proper creation by a benevolent god?

The differentiation of cells is what allows specialization of tissue to occur. That can't happen with nourishment.

Food is consumed by all life, even simple plants that use their roots to absorb nutrients from the soil.

Are you asking for a barren world devoid of the diversity of species? For without the array of creatures to live and die and so form soil or serve as nutrition for other species, there is no food chain.

Even if a being of energy were possible, how would it maintain cohesiveness? How would it grow? What would limit its growth if not bound?

The topic seems very ilogical.
 Quoting: Don'tBeAfraid


Surely a god with unlimited power over the universe can find a way to create a diverse amount of species that didn't involve the food chain? Or are you saying your god is limited?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 11421136

Quite the contrary. I'm saying your idea is limited and illogical. You still haven't proposed a lifeform that didn't need nourishment. You didn't study Biology did you?

I'm quite surprised at some of the posts that literally whine about theoretical things, and yet don't pose a solution. In this case, this form of debate is academic as it's impossible to realize, and yet you fail to do the most basic aspects of debating as well as failing to enter into a dialectic with others. You merely complain. It's rather boring, but minorly amusing at 6 am to watch someone rail against what cannot be changed.

Would you like superpowers too? It's like talking to a child.
 Quoting: Don'tBeAfraid


Dude, you're missing OPs point. If there a LOVING God created this system, then why the need to eat to survive?

The fact that animals must consume food to survive does not allow for a "loving" environment, but instead an environment of competition.

So, either God does not exist or God is not loving. Pretty simple shit if you'd just take the time to analyze instead of puffing and huffing your point without consideration of the original topic.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1409758

No, I'm making fun of him. One could easily turn this into a logical discourse on say alternative logical lifeforms and the atheist perspective on poor engineering in Humanity as well as the connected ecosystem of the Earth.

But so far, it's merely bellyaching! TOO FUNNY!

You need some help. There's tons of videos by Neil deGrasse Tyson which discuss what I bolded above. Those are both humorous as well as logical discussions on a lack of intelligent design. I suggest you listen to some.

You see, it's not me trying to persuade you about a belief in God. I could care less. I don't want to convince you because of Free Will.

Instead let's focus and actually debate how an ideal lifeform would exist. That would be interesting, but unless you understand some basic Engineering or Metabolism or Biology in general, then we won't have proper frames of reference.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!