Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,947 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,657,319
Pageviews Today: 3,632,762Threads Today: 814Posts Today: 15,957
09:41 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject A digestive system is irrefutable proof that there is no loving god
Poster Handle Don'tBeAfraid
Post Content
How would you propose to grow cells without nourishment? This is kind of a ridiculous topic, but I'm willing to engage you. Have you studied any biology whatsoever, much less biochemistry? How could a being without cells have continuity of Self?

What are you proposing, beings of pure energy? Is that your litmus test for a proper creation by a benevolent god?

The differentiation of cells is what allows specialization of tissue to occur. That can't happen with nourishment.

Food is consumed by all life, even simple plants that use their roots to absorb nutrients from the soil.

Are you asking for a barren world devoid of the diversity of species? For without the array of creatures to live and die and so form soil or serve as nutrition for other species, there is no food chain.

Even if a being of energy were possible, how would it maintain cohesiveness? How would it grow? What would limit its growth if not bound?

The topic seems very ilogical.
 Quoting: Don'tBeAfraid


Hmmmm, so you admit god does not exist.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30981074

Where did I make any claim that God does not exist? You are presuming that that bolded statement refers to God. It does not, we are discussing hypothetical alternative humans.

You do possess the capacity to understand English well enough to carry on a debate, don't you?
 Quoting: Don'tBeAfraid


Ah now I see. God can exist as a pure energy being but hypothetical humans could not.

Do you possess the capacity to understand logical thought processes well enough to realize your own cognitive dissonance?

Also, questioning someone's ability to understand English while being incapable of proof reading ones own writing is pretty fucking pathetic.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30981074


Where are you getting that God is pure energy? Not from me. Even a being of pure energy would be limited. God is limitless. God need not manifest at all.

I find the need to pidgeon-hole God into a being of energy entirely laughable. God created the Universe, why would such a deity need to have a body at all unless only for our benefit to speak?

That's a totally Greek/Roman concept of anthropomorphic deities, and no theologian would ever create such a small limited being for God.

Would you prefer "You are presuming that this bolded statement refers to God" ?

I believe both are correct.

I question your command of English because you make these wild leaps of assuming things which are not within the body of my statements.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:



News