Remote Viewing: Iron Domes ... a distraction - Israel & SYRIA

Mabus then will soon die, there will come

Of people and beasts a horrible rout:

Then suddenly one will see vengeance,

Hundred, hand, thirst, hunger when the comet will run

Century 2, Quatrain 62

[link to www.whiteoutpress.com]

The comet Gomez?

We have 2012 DA14 on 02/15, and Ison later in the year.
2012 DA14 next month on the 15th is why this caught my eye. Also, SOTU speach isn't it ?

edit to add...
just watching all I can, 1st quarter this year could be very bad.

"when the comet will run" ....interesting....

Adding your quote from the other thread, very interesting !

As always...thanks OP!

Thought you might find this interesting as it goes along with what was written directly above ("Not for himself, but for the one he apponts to follow him...")

The Ulsterman Report - REPUBLICAN INSIDER: How Barack Obama Secures A Third Term And More…

[link to theulstermanreport.com]

In this article the "Republican Insider" states that Obama's agenda is to choose his sucessor, thus extending his influence past 2016.

Holy Moly.
DIDN'T Biden or someone like that say something about the campaign structure still being in place (recently)?? And we on GLP were all like 'WTF did that mean?'

It touched on something the media has hinted at, but behind the scenes has a lot of us scrambling to prepare for and that is Barack Obama’s campaign machine being kept in place and even strengthened to not only be used as powerful political leverage for the 2014 midterms and then during and after the 2016 election, but well beyond that time frame as well. I think the phrase was “community organizing on a global scale”. I will confirm that (WHI) is 100% correct about that. It’s called Organizing for Action and it’s actually bypassing the traditional DNC and its goal, if what I’m told is correct, is to raise hundreds of millions of dollars and utilize “issue bombing” to exert tremendous pressure on politicians to vote as Barack Obama/Valerie Jarrett would want them to vote or face further damaging public relations courtesy of the Organizing for Action machine. This also means the current Obama team thinks they are capable of choosing Obama’s 2016 successor and make no mistake, that also means then that the same agenda that has so many of us frustrated and fearful now will NOT stop after 2016. It really will be the total globalization of the Obama presidency. He will extend his influence well beyond just eight years in the White House. Now let that sink in. The possible ramifications of that scenario should scare the heck out of all of us who already recognize just how bad things are going now.

Can't think of where right now but heard the other day that somehow his campaign funds and future donations are now being funneled into advancing his agendas...

Yes, Organizing for Action is just one of the engiens being used to advance his agenda.

I believe he is behind the groups coming out against guns. They are way too organized and well-funded to just be grassroots.

Actually, is ia not determined that BO cannot serve a third term or even forever. The 2nd ammendment may be under assault, but so is the 22nd:

Thread: At Least 5 Democrats Seek End To 22nd Amendment (President Limited To Two Terms) - Guess Who???

Yes NO term limits for the President, is that possible? It always WAS until they penned the 22nd Ammendment, but now they may very well repeal it. Dictator for life anyone?

How many times are you people going to underestimate this commie clown?

Thread: Hacks Expose Chemical Weapons False Flag

Syrian Flag

[link to www.google.com (secure)]

THIS portion of the session:



Reminded me of this post from my Tekwanago thread:

[link to www.jpost.com]

relevant ?

Its certainly interesting and worrying whether its related/relevant or not :-(

[link to www.canadafreepress.com]

DH: When? How soon will all of this happen?

RB: I don’t have a crystal ball, but I have seen various reports referencing unprecedented “drills” to take place in later March and April. I’ll mention this because I know a lot of people on the inside at DHS have seen this. A document called “Operation Thunderdome.” It’s maybe 50 or 60 pages, I’m not certain. It describes an economic collapse in the U.S., followed by an attack on the government by “a made-up patriotic group.” It combines gun owners, Constitutionalists, and even Christians into an enemy group that pulls off an attack in Washington.

But don’t fall into the trap of trying to pick the time of these events. Their plans are flexible, but their objectives are carved in stone.

DH: Sounds like a Reichstag type event- sometime.

RB: Exactly. Maybe not just one. They have plans and back-up plans and back-ups for the back-ups. And in spite of the warnings, and history, enough people will be outraged and side with the government. This brings me to my final point. What do you think all of the prepositioning of paramilitary assets, caches of ammunition, and the opening of non-descript buildings owned or leased by the federal government are for?

It’s for you and people like you. It’s for those who are turned in by their neighbors, friends, co-workers, and others who are hungry, broke and broken. What we are about to experience will be like it was during the Civil War, only worse. People will be outgunned, surveillance will be everywhere, and it will be much more difficult to hide and fight back. Not impossible, but more difficult.


DH: So you’re painting a picture of a Mad Max scenario, hence the reference to Thunderdome?

RB: Believe it or not, part of the model, or at least one of them, includes the depiction of a somewhat “normal” society, at least after the initial “hostilities.” People will be controlled by the national government, centralized - in order to escape the chaos. Think of it this way. You want food and medical care? You will not be able to own a gun, period. The current federal legislation is all window dressing - a distraction. No one expects anything meaningful to pass. It won’t have to. States, yes, but those states are lining up for federal money. The elected leaders are of the same ideology as Obama, but aside from those, we’ll see many people turning in their weapons for food, shelter, medical care, and false guarantees of safety. That’s what the new normal will look like.

As I said, you’ve got to think bigger - much bigger. The lies are bigger than most people can imagine. The people at the top are laughing at us. Think about that. They are laughing at us because it’s right in front of our noses. And you know, the bigger the lie…

DH: Yes, the more people will fall for it.

RB: Right. I think we’re done here for now. I’ve given you as much information as I know, as I have seen. Watch the economy - the indicators. Watch for a false flag. We are being baited. Let people pooh-pooh this information, seek information through FOI requests. Not gonna happen. We’re talking about an operation so black and so big, and one that has to be done in the next few years, under Obama.

This is something that is international in scope. The plan is international, and is dedicated to the dismantling or destruction of America. It’s happening right in front of us, but too few can actually see it.

[link to www.canadafreepress.com]

DH: Okay, we can get on with it, then.

RB: First of all, two days after the inauguration, at exactly 7:00 a.m. on January 23, something called “the Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project” was activated. I heard about this the week after the election, but only saw a hardcopy draft in late December. From what I was told, I believe this is a project that is being paid for through funds from Obama’s political corporation, the 501(c)4 Organizing for Obama, I believe it’s called. I can’t be sure, but that’s what I was told.

At that time, I was shown a white, three-ring binder with Obama’s circular campaign logo imprinted on the outside of the binder with the name “Cyber-Warriors for Obama” printed in blue across the top. Inside were the names and e-mail addresses of 3,575 “cyber assets,” or “warriors,” listed in alphabetical order under about a dozen or so “team leaders.” From a separate sheet I was shown, most of these “assets” are being paid just over minimum wage, but as I understand it, they work from home and have no overhead. I believe there are about two dozen supervisors who make substantially more.

Now I only had the binder for a minute, and could not take it from the room I was in, so this is strictly from memory.

It was tabbed, and one section with the word “targets” had a list of religious web sites, web sites I recognized as Christian. Another section was a listing of conservative Internet sites. There was another tab with the label “problem sites” that seemed quite extensive. I looked at that section, and it was broken down further into “birther” sites, “pro-gun” sites, “anti-abortion” sites, just to name a few.

There was also a section of the usual news sites, like CNN, ABC, you know. Numerous e-mail addresses were conspicuous under each news organization, which also included Fox… [unintelligible]. I figured you were going to ask.

The first page of the binder had bullet points labeled “objectives” and instructions for the cyber-assets. There was also a very detailed non-disclosure agreement with the word “DRAFT” typed in big, light grey letters across the body of the two-page agreement. The agreement and the instructions were typed on white paper with a warning, printed in red on each page, that the document was not to be copied or disseminated.

DH: Do you know if these “team members” have their own copies of the binder you saw?

RB: No. I was told that these people were hired through the campaign offices located throughout the country, and that training meetings were held at various locations. The binders were for instructional purposes, not to hand out. Although I think the people have, or were given, a list of web sites.

I don’t know any more on the actual mechanics of the project.

DH: Go on.

RB: The instructions seemed very specific. Infiltrate web forums, collect screen names, avatars, and posters’ tag lines, and attempt to resolve these to their actual identities. I read one paragraph that listed circumstances when the “asset” was only to monitor but do not disrupt without authorization. There was another section titled “Divert, Disrupt and Destroy,” listing “how to’s” in certain cases.

There was also a section on maintaining a social media presence, and another on the most effective use of Twitter.

Lastly, there was a “reference section,” which included statistics, specific language to use to marginalize different posters, and effective methods to discredit people while maintaining a sense of legitimacy.

It was surreal, to say the least.

Oh, one more thing that’s important. As I said, these “kids,” or young people I believe, are known collectively as “Cyber-Warriors for Obama.” The subheading was “And the truth shall set you free.” Truth? Really? They were hired on their hacking abilities, or more precisely on their abilities to make postings through proxy servers and effectively use alternate identities and multiple e-mail addresses. Their purpose is to spread disinformation, not truth.

There were also motivational statements on various pages, including one that referred to Obama as the “Pharaoh of the Internet,” which I thought was an odd characterization.

Looks like a solid hit T.
Creepy.

creepy indeed :-(

I thought this one from the Remote viewing discussion thread was also... unsettling:

Thread: Remote Viewing Discussion -- future times / places / spontaneous OBEs (Page 14)

Gold/Silver Plunging, Threat from SKorea, Boston Bombings?

bump for Syria / Explosions in Damascus

Thread: Who needs CISSPA when the whole world decides to 'crack down' on data privacy?

It may well be Arabic since it now appeared in the news today that there may be the transfer of a large number of Syrian refugees to the USA for "humanitarian reasons".

[link to www.breitbart.com]



Last Edited by Marisol on 06/14/2013 04:49 PM

Timelines are interchangeable / fluid as we are finding out.

I guess we have to think of timelines as 'guidelines' and not concrete.

and how do we think timelines as guidelines?
Clarify please.

Related.