Sandy Hook Fire Department Extension Built On | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32912855 United States 01/30/2013 12:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is odd. I would say that is just camera angle and the lens. On the full building shot the roof on the far right is what, 3 feet high at the most? But look at the larger pic. How the hell did it gain 5+ feet? Also where the hell is the chimney in the full building shot? LOL what the hell? |
The Sonic Dreamer User ID: 19453308 United States 01/30/2013 02:11 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I am tired but this thread is an excellent find. The two photos are not of the same exact time....Examine the color and style of the ambulances parked in the area where people are seen "walking around" in the super-pinned video. If these photos are from different days....then when were ambulances and dozens of people also at the Sandy Hook F.D. station? There may be a logical explanation for this.....Here is hoping someone can debunk this thread. I am pinning it, in hopes someone can. Now, while I was examining these photos, I happened to be listening to this, which was uploaded approximately one year and one month ago, regarding the "coming assault weapons ban" and "problem/reaction/solution" from thewatcherfiles.com, presumably posted in the 1990s? Listen from 0:37 seconds on, very interesting connection, no? Currently working on: Bach: Invention No. 1 Joplin: Maple Leaf Rag Mendelssohn: Tarantella Op.102 no.3 Mendelssohn: Venetian Boat Song Op. 19 no. 6 (both from 'Songs Without Words') |
SweemZ User ID: 28252891 United States 01/30/2013 02:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31808028 United States 01/30/2013 02:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1280257 United States 01/30/2013 02:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MidWestGuy User ID: 31487253 United States 01/30/2013 02:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's the camera angle. It's the same building. Count the cars in the overhead shot and you see there are 6 cars parked with the 2 yellow trucks being the 5th and 6th. Then take a look at the closer shot and you see that the exact same cars are there except for the 6th truck (yellow) which is gone. You can see the space voided by the 6th car and how the building stretches just like in the 1st photo. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31762502 United States 01/30/2013 02:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31808028 United States 01/30/2013 02:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's the camera angle. It's the same building. Count the cars in the overhead shot and you see there are 6 cars parked with the 2 yellow trucks being the 5th and 6th. Then take a look at the closer shot and you see that the exact same cars are there except for the 6th truck (yellow) which is gone. You can see the space voided by the 6th car and how the building stretches just like in the 1st photo. Quoting: MidWestGuy 31487253 LOOK AT THE BROWN CHIMNEY. It isnt the camera angle. I thought it was at first. If it was the camera angle, the chimney would be on the extension in one photo, and not the other. |
MidWestGuy User ID: 31487253 United States 01/30/2013 02:57 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's the camera angle. It's the same building. Count the cars in the overhead shot and you see there are 6 cars parked with the 2 yellow trucks being the 5th and 6th. Then take a look at the closer shot and you see that the exact same cars are there except for the 6th truck (yellow) which is gone. You can see the space voided by the 6th car and how the building stretches just like in the 1st photo. Quoting: MidWestGuy 31487253 LOOK AT THE BROWN CHIMNEY. It isnt the camera angle. I thought it was at first. If it was the camera angle, the chimney would be on the extension in one photo, and not the other. Ok. Here is another photo. [link to ww1.hdnux.com] And I discovered something interesting about the 2nd photo the OP posted. It looks like someone photo shopped it. Zoom in really close and you will see the discrepancy in the roof. |
MidWestGuy User ID: 31487253 United States 01/30/2013 02:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's the camera angle. It's the same building. Count the cars in the overhead shot and you see there are 6 cars parked with the 2 yellow trucks being the 5th and 6th. Then take a look at the closer shot and you see that the exact same cars are there except for the 6th truck (yellow) which is gone. You can see the space voided by the 6th car and how the building stretches just like in the 1st photo. Quoting: MidWestGuy 31487253 LOOK AT THE BROWN CHIMNEY. It isnt the camera angle. I thought it was at first. If it was the camera angle, the chimney would be on the extension in one photo, and not the other. Ok. Here is another photo. [link to ww1.hdnux.com] And I discovered something interesting about the 2nd photo the OP posted. It looks like someone photo shopped it. Zoom in really close and you will see the discrepancy in the roof. I'm sorry, I meant the 1st photo looks to be photo shopped, not the 2nd. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22373790 United States 01/30/2013 03:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's the camera angle. It's the same building. Count the cars in the overhead shot and you see there are 6 cars parked with the 2 yellow trucks being the 5th and 6th. Then take a look at the closer shot and you see that the exact same cars are there except for the 6th truck (yellow) which is gone. You can see the space voided by the 6th car and how the building stretches just like in the 1st photo. Quoting: MidWestGuy 31487253 LOOK AT THE BROWN CHIMNEY. It isnt the camera angle. I thought it was at first. If it was the camera angle, the chimney would be on the extension in one photo, and not the other. Ok. Here is another photo. [link to ww1.hdnux.com] And I discovered something interesting about the 2nd photo the OP posted. It looks like someone photo shopped it. Zoom in really close and you will see the discrepancy in the roof. I'm sorry, I meant the 1st photo looks to be photo shopped, not the 2nd. Agreed, the first photo looks shopped but I don't know shit about PS. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22373790 United States 01/30/2013 03:05 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MidWestGuy User ID: 31487253 United States 01/30/2013 03:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1310161 Iceland 01/30/2013 03:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't think this is due to photoshop work but more due to the pic being taken from above in a helicopter from a great distance. It distorts the perspective a bit and the line indicated by the arrows is the separation between the extension and main building, as seen through a powerful telephoto lens. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33031821 United States 01/30/2013 03:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
MidWestGuy User ID: 31487253 United States 01/30/2013 03:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't think this is due to photoshop work but more due to the pic being taken from above in a helicopter from a great distance. It distorts the perspective a bit and the line indicated by the arrows is the separation between the extension and main building, as seen through a powerful telephoto lens. You might be right. Either way, this disproves the OP's theory that the photographs were taken on different days. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32912855 United States 01/30/2013 03:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32912855 United States 01/30/2013 03:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33190095 South Africa 01/30/2013 03:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Im no professional, but it doesnt look like the chimney was shopped. [link to fotoforensics.com] [link to fotoforensics.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33187196 Canada 01/30/2013 06:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
TheMessenger User ID: 12100219 United States 01/30/2013 06:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Watching the world User ID: 10137056 United States 01/30/2013 06:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why do you not talk about the person behind the actors. Like Tony Hawk, his wife, their children, Dave England and his kids , all Jackass Members and all present there that day? Quoting: TheMessenger 12100219 For real? I hadn't heard that! Ignorance is bliss until reality bites you in the ass. I take care of the dead...always. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32552444 United States 01/30/2013 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Maybe some of the footage is from the previous drill the year before, keeping or putting similar cars in the same place, or it is actually the "MAGNIFICENT...THING!" that Dr (don't call me Howard!) Carver was talking about. The only image that shows a tent in the school parking lot is a still shot, that could have been photoshopped in to dispel the rumors of the tent/THING being somewhere else??? Not sure.... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31777186 Australia 01/30/2013 06:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I build 3d houses all day long for architects and builders and have done for WAY too many years. I can clearly see that the building has not changed at all. Its just the angle and lighting that's playing with you eyes here. If you zoom in you can see that the roof is higher (it's kicked off by a pixel or two) Don't get me wrong, the Sandy Hook thing is complete and utter bullshit but you're not barking up the right tree here. IMPO. |
me (OP) User ID: 33299046 United States 01/30/2013 07:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29971029 United States 01/30/2013 07:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If u take some common sense and look at the pictures, you will come to the conclusion that there is no difference in the building. The chiminies are in the same place. The little yellow truck with the cap next to the addition is in the same spot as the second pic... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33123581 United States 01/30/2013 07:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I have found two photographs that clearly show this one shooting was photographed on two very different days. I don't know what to think anymore. Anyway, the first photograph shows a taped off Sandy Hook Fire Department, but the rear of the building, facing the bottom of the picture is one single part. Quoting: me 33299046 In the second photograph, there has obviously been an extension built onto the fire department; yet they are portraying the scene to be the same day. Many of the same cars are parked in the same places, though not all exactly alike. But it seems we are to believe these are both from December 14, 2012. Anyway, here they are: Here is a photo of the Sandy Hook Fire Department without an extension built onto the back: [link to d6673sr63mbv7.cloudfront.net] Here is a photo of the Sandy Hook FIre Department with an extension built onto the back: [link to www.google.com] It's just the camera angel. The cars and their locations all match up EXCEPT for the emergency vehicles. They have changed, which I find strange but I guess some of them were moving. If you like at the other cars, there is a red one on the corner of the building and that little red trailer thing is there too. There is also still a yellow car and the red truck and the silver car and the white car is parked next to it but hard to see in the second pic. The emergency vehicles change though. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16166048 United States 01/30/2013 07:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's the camera angle. It's the same building. Count the cars in the overhead shot and you see there are 6 cars parked with the 2 yellow trucks being the 5th and 6th. Then take a look at the closer shot and you see that the exact same cars are there except for the 6th truck (yellow) which is gone. You can see the space voided by the 6th car and how the building stretches just like in the 1st photo. Quoting: MidWestGuy 31487253 I noticed the missing yellow truck as well. Did you not notice that yellow police tape is in both photos as well? The yellow tape pins in 2 yellow vehicles in one photo and 1 in another. The trucks look to be maintence or support vehicles for the station. Why in the middle of a full on emergency, did someone need to drive off in a maintence/support vehicle, which I might add was roped off with POLICE TAPE? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33322991 United States 01/30/2013 07:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16166048 United States 01/30/2013 08:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | One simple question. How much is the fine for parking in a Fire Lane, say at you local mall? O.K. what would be the fine for pinning in Emergency Fire Vehicles at a Fire Station. I see major violations of various local, city and federal laws, codes and statutes. If a fire or emergency occured and response was hindered, you can bet a ball- busting lawsuit would be filed. A poop storm of hell would rain down starting at the federal level ending with the FD Chief being busted down to riding shotgun in the local dogcatcher truck. |