Apparently Obama was convicted in Federal Court on the Birther Fraud issues

Are we still talking about the shite. Really!

#bangingheadagainstwall

That's an illuminating picture...he looks totally sleazy.

This is proposed order. It is not THE order.

There was no response so now it the ruling should go to the plaintiffs. This includes the RECOMMEND judgement from the plaintiffs. It is not signed by the judge.

Bottom line is that Obama has a court date on February 15th with the entire cast of the SCOTUS.

Don't forget their ongoing battle cry... "You do not have standing."

It will be rather easy for the full court to say that this judge simply doesn't have standing in the case (without mentioning who does).

But from what I remember from my law classes long ago, only the full House of Representatives have standing against a sitting POTUS. It is their (and only their) right to bring an indictment against a POTUS. And that indictment is known as "Impeachment."

Won't happen in the middle of a war conflict.....

That is a proposed order written by OT...Judge hasn't signed it yet...

You are correct. Parliament is the court of judgment where it members are accused of breaching its rules.

That particular prescription was also exported to the US in your adoption of the rules that govern Westminster.

At best, an American court can refer these matters to be considered by your House.

These rules were designed to deter frivolity and the consequent obstruction of day to day goverment.

Well then we're fucked. The Congress won't do SHIT because they are all owned by TPTB.

What the FUCK can be done about this? Hell, it can be proven over and over that Obummer is a fraud, but if the damn Congress won't impeach him then what can be done?

When I think that if this is true, then either McCain or Romney would be declared Pres. to replace him . . . . I hate to say that I hope it's all a crock.

Thats assuming that whoever did the background checks on Obama when he was put forwad for a seat in the House was asleep at the time.

Impeachment is well nigh impossible unless there is clear evidence of an impeachable offence which was delibertaely hidden from the House. Entry to the House will go through one of the most sophisticated secret services in the world and consequently, I think these accusations are pretty much groundless.

Taitz is probably on the make for a fast buck and realises that she has a ready milking cow in a subject such as this. The best you can do is to be proactive at the next electons and make a convincing case for his replacement (oh wait, thats unnecessary as he will have run his terms in office.).

As a general point, banging on about his race, or the way he stands when he pisses does not help your case. No one but the pretty feebleminded would want to lay the future of their country in the hands of those who think like that.

This should give good updates on the status...

[link to www.gpo.gov]

Because thet are all Jews, and that is who is tring to make you their slave.

You really didn;t know that? Wow

That's not true, criminal offenses committed before his election are still within the pervue of the courts...they just can't sentence him until his term is complete.

And of course Civil Rights violations or other Constitutional Violations are definitely within the pervue of the courts...and Elections violations...

And there is always the fact that if he was never eligible to be President, then he never was President, meaning he can be arrested and imprisoned without Congressional Impeachment...

Last Edited by Saddletramp on 01/31/2013 11:59 PM

Sorry, but these are not legal court documents. First, there are grammatical errors, something that you do not see in legal pleadings. Second, legal pleadings do not have multiple colors to highlight areas that one wants pointed out or emphasis on. Simple legal formatting is not even used.

I hate to say it, but I do not think this one is real. I would love to see the real one come to light, as I am sure it is out there somewhere.

Just my opinion though.

that how many votes he got?

Oh really? lol

Putin-Obama collab you mean?

Gimme space yo! Gotcha bro.

Biden is the Anti-Christ?

Oh shit. It all makes sense now.

Yes, this is a filing in the case by Orly Taitz. It's not a ruling by the judge.

She came damn close in Georgia, was winning clearly on the merits, the judge even said so ... but then the judge took a couple weeks or months break, got "religion", and ruled against her anyway.

:obmawut:

They have been informed..

We Shall See (words NOT in the Holy Bible)

I think they aren't reading yours, thanks does put a nail in it!

It's called an Indictment.

It pays to read carefully. Parliament presides over the breaches of "ITS RULES". In other words, where a candidate enters the house under false pretenses or acts in a manner that exceeds the powers conferred on him by the house, the house determines the case as in that instance we are dealing with constitutional rules on how the house manages itself. So if he gave an undertaking to the house that he was eligible to be there for being a US born person and it transpires he was born elsewhere, it is the house that determines whether he warrants impeachment and a remedy.

However, were he to murder someone, then the house first sits to eject him and then refer him to the jurisdiction of the regular courts for consideration under the criminal law.

This is called due process which distinguishes us from the likes of say Saudi Arabia where you are arbitrarily subject to punishment on a whim simply because of someone's perception of you.

These protocols underlie our civilisation whether you like it or not.

This is termed the separation of powers. It would be a new day in Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence were a judicial body to step in and remove a member of the executive. That is always a matter for the house to do, even where a criminal offence (as opposed to a constitutional breach) rises for consideration.

it does look like a hasty pudding, since the readable version is on scribd, and not a pdf of a court brief (the one in the video was not readable even in full screen.)

however, it sure is an eyeful.

interesting that they said it was being forwarded to the "Judicial Commission" of the US Congress...not Committee.

would not "Judicial Commission" be a separate body from the Congress, perhaps the one associated with Supreme Court of the U.S. ?

The court of the Commons (the Houses of Parliament) was always intended to be separate from the other powers in both policing itself as well as in the work of its committees, to ensure that the memebers of that court were not likely to be subject to interference by the Monarch through the judiciary which was under the sway of the Royal court in the early years of rule by the commons.

This practice was exported to the colonies who then included it in their constitutional conventions.

It works well as we find at the moment where a group of Americans want Obama gone becuase of his race yet the conventions of government demand that the office of government remain free from the whims of external interference between elections.

This woman fled Russia to enjoy the freedoms of the Anglo-Saxon world. She would be adivised to try and undersand their history.