National Review says Hitler made sense?!!!? WTF?!!? | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 33442236 United States 02/01/2013 08:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nazism may have been an ideology to which the United States was — and to which the president is — implacably opposed, but it is hardly “senseless.” By the early 1930s, the Nazi party had hundreds of thousands of devoted members and repeatedly attracted a third of the votes in German elections; its political leaders campaigned on a platform comprising 25 non-senseless points, including the “unification of all Germans,” a demand for “land and territory for the sustenance of our people,” and an assertion that “no Jew can be a member of the race.” Suffice it to say, many sensible Germans were persuaded. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33442236 [link to www.nationalreview.com] Right Wing Fascism reveals itself. You are the ultimate moran. Nazi Party is a left wing party... 1) No (how many times no) -- the Nazi's were right -wing and that is a historical fact (despite so many morons on the net making up bs) 2) NR is right-wing DEFENDING the Nazis. See 1. 3) So why don't you deal with 2? Hitler was the leader of the National Socialist Party (NSDAP) Socialists are left thinking and not right thinking, clearly you are watching too much zombievision. equivocation going on... typical. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9718093 United States 02/01/2013 08:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you wanted the best for your country and its people why wouldn't you have Nazism ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31928649 No private companies making profits from things essential to the people; water, energy, healthcare, education etc etc That's the socialist part. controlled immigration, all imports taxed so they don't undercut home built goods, and the country men always put first....That's the nationalism. BINGO And Hitler made Germany into the greatest nation ever to exist until the jews destroyed it with their propaganda and turned the American people against Hitler. Read some real history, most Americans thought Hitler was a great man until the jewish rags slandered him I would love to read the real history. Until he died, my dad said the whole thing was not what we were taught. He was born in 1932 so I always felt that maybe since he was around at the time, he was probably right. Can you suggest a book (or 2 or 3) or a site where I can read up on this? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29030368 United Kingdom 02/01/2013 10:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22089462 Netherlands 02/01/2013 11:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nazism may have been an ideology to which the United States was — and to which the president is — implacably opposed, but it is hardly “senseless.” By the early 1930s, the Nazi party had hundreds of thousands of devoted members and repeatedly attracted a third of the votes in German elections; its political leaders campaigned on a platform comprising 25 non-senseless points, including the “unification of all Germans,” a demand for “land and territory for the sustenance of our people,” and an assertion that “no Jew can be a member of the race.” Suffice it to say, many sensible Germans were persuaded. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33442236 [link to www.nationalreview.com] Right Wing Fascism reveals itself. Adopting the exact same policy is precisely what we need to save our nation, do you deny that? IDIOT HIS STORY history=jewstory Grow a brain and STFU, Hitler was fighting communism and we should have fought with him. Nearly everyone at the time of the war with brain that wasn't jewish was wondering WTF we were doing "Those who perished as a result of Nazi terror, millions of individual men and women and children whose lives were taken so senselessly, must never be forgotten." -- Ronald Reagan Remarks at a White House Meeting With Jewish Leaders, February 2, 1983 [link to www.reagan.utexas.edu] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33452045 United States 02/01/2013 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The economics of fascism are collectivist, socialist and redistributionist – supremely hostile to free-market capitalism and wealth inequalities. Indeed, fascism is closely related to communism in both theory and practice. The chief difference between the two is that fascism is rooted in nationalism and seeks to create a socialist utopia within the confines of a particular country's borders; thus the Nazis, for instance, embraced “National Socialism.” Communism, by contrast, seeks to transcend national boundaries and promote a worldwide proletariat revolution, where the foot soldiers are bound together not by a common nationality but by their membership in the same economic class. The communist position was articulated in Karl Marx's famous exhortation in the Communist Manifesto: “Workers of the world, unite!” Apart from this distinction, communism and fascism are kindred spirits of anti-capitalist totalitarianism. Author Jonah Goldberg characterizes them as “closely related, historical competitors for the same constituents, seeking to dominate and control the same social space.” As the fascist Mussolini put it, in a 1921 speech: “Between us and the communists there are no political affinities but there are intellectual ones. Like you [communists], we consider necessary a centralized unitary state which imposes iron discipline and all persons, with this difference, that you reached this conclusion by way of the concept of class, and we by the way of the concept of nation.” In his book Communism: A History, Richard Pipes has identified a number of additional areas where German and Italian fascism bore striking similarities to Soviet communism: -Both the fascists and communists had a common enemy, which was liberal democracy with its reverence for civil rights, property, and peace. -Both the fascists and communists were totalitarian regimes that regarded human beings as expendable raw material for the construction of a new social order. -Both the fascists and communists tried to obliterate all distinctions between the state and the citizenry by penetrating and controlling every aspect of organized life. -Both the fascists and communists enjoyed a political monopoly and governed with the assistance of the security police, which were endowed with unrestricted powers. -Both the fascists and communists viewed pacifism with contempt. [link to www.discoverthenetworks.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33455141 United States 02/01/2013 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nazism may have been an ideology to which the United States was — and to which the president is — implacably opposed, but it is hardly “senseless.” By the early 1930s, the Nazi party had hundreds of thousands of devoted members and repeatedly attracted a third of the votes in German elections; its political leaders campaigned on a platform comprising 25 non-senseless points, including the “unification of all Germans,” a demand for “land and territory for the sustenance of our people,” and an assertion that “no Jew can be a member of the race.” Suffice it to say, many sensible Germans were persuaded. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33442236 [link to www.nationalreview.com] Right Wing Fascism reveals itself. Adopting the exact same policy is precisely what we need to save our nation, do you deny that? IDIOT HIS STORY history=jewstory Grow a brain and STFU, Hitler was fighting communism and we should have fought with him. Nearly everyone at the time of the war with brain that wasn't jewish was wondering WTF we were doing "Those who perished as a result of Nazi terror, millions of individual men and women and children whose lives were taken so senselessly, must never be forgotten." -- Ronald Reagan Remarks at a White House Meeting With Jewish Leaders, February 2, 1983 [link to www.reagan.utexas.edu] Indeed |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33455141 United States 02/01/2013 11:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The economics of fascism are collectivist, socialist and redistributionist – supremely hostile to free-market capitalism and wealth inequalities. Indeed, fascism is closely related to communism in both theory and practice. The chief difference between the two is that fascism is rooted in nationalism and seeks to create a socialist utopia within the confines of a particular country's borders; thus the Nazis, for instance, embraced “National Socialism.” Communism, by contrast, seeks to transcend national boundaries and promote a worldwide proletariat revolution, where the foot soldiers are bound together not by a common nationality but by their membership in the same economic class. The communist position was articulated in Karl Marx's famous exhortation in the Communist Manifesto: “Workers of the world, unite!” Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33452045 Apart from this distinction, communism and fascism are kindred spirits of anti-capitalist totalitarianism. Author Jonah Goldberg characterizes them as “closely related, historical competitors for the same constituents, seeking to dominate and control the same social space.” As the fascist Mussolini put it, in a 1921 speech: “Between us and the communists there are no political affinities but there are intellectual ones. Like you [communists], we consider necessary a centralized unitary state which imposes iron discipline and all persons, with this difference, that you reached this conclusion by way of the concept of class, and we by the way of the concept of nation.” In his book Communism: A History, Richard Pipes has identified a number of additional areas where German and Italian fascism bore striking similarities to Soviet communism: -Both the fascists and communists had a common enemy, which was liberal democracy with its reverence for civil rights, property, and peace. -Both the fascists and communists were totalitarian regimes that regarded human beings as expendable raw material for the construction of a new social order. -Both the fascists and communists tried to obliterate all distinctions between the state and the citizenry by penetrating and controlling every aspect of organized life. -Both the fascists and communists enjoyed a political monopoly and governed with the assistance of the security police, which were endowed with unrestricted powers. -Both the fascists and communists viewed pacifism with contempt. [link to www.discoverthenetworks.org] Pipes is a well known fraud. Next. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 21659241 Canada 02/01/2013 02:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you wanted the best for your country and its people why wouldn't you have Nazism ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31928649 No private companies making profits from things essential to the people; water, energy, healthcare, education etc etc That's the socialist part. controlled immigration, all imports taxed so they don't undercut home built goods, and the country men always put first....That's the nationalism. BINGO And Hitler made Germany into the greatest nation ever to exist until the jews destroyed it with their propaganda and turned the American people against Hitler. Read some real history, most Americans thought Hitler was a great man until the jewish rags slandered him I would love to read the real history. Until he died, my dad said the whole thing was not what we were taught. He was born in 1932 so I always felt that maybe since he was around at the time, he was probably right. Can you suggest a book (or 2 or 3) or a site where I can read up on this? |
SmuRidley User ID: 591627 Canada 02/01/2013 02:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 214464 United States 02/02/2013 04:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If you wanted the best for your country and its people why wouldn't you have Nazism ? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31928649 No private companies making profits from things essential to the people; water, energy, healthcare, education etc etc That's the socialist part. controlled immigration, all imports taxed so they don't undercut home built goods, and the country men always put first....That's the nationalism. BINGO And Hitler made Germany into the greatest nation ever to exist until the jews destroyed it with their propaganda and turned the American people against Hitler. Read some real history, most Americans thought Hitler was a great man until the jewish rags slandered him |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33513719 Serbia 02/02/2013 04:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hitler never wavered from his personal opinion that the survival of Germany as a great power depended upon an alliance with the British Empire. In 1936 he instituted proceedings to try to bring about this alliance. He arranged for unofficial conversations to take place between German and British diplomats, and after the meetings failed to produce the alliance he so greatly desired, he said: “No sacrifice would have been too great in order to gain England’s alliance. It would have meant renunciation of our colonies; and importance as a sea power; and refraining from interference with British industry by competition.”[2] He considered all these German concessions would have been worthwhile if only he had been able to bring about the German- British alliance. His failure to bring about the British Alliance caused him to weaken in his opposition to the totalitarian ideology as advocated by the extreme Nazi War Lords. The failure of the conference convinced Hitler that no moderate policy would ever break the control the international bankers had over British Foreign policy. He reluctantly began to concede that Karl Ritter had been right when he said: “The power the Jewish financiers hold over Communism must be destroyed, as well as of those who are members of the world revolutionary movement, before peace and economic freedom can be restored to the world.” William Guy Carr - Pawns in the Game |
Chrit User ID: 27088294 United States 02/02/2013 04:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nazism may have been an ideology to which the United States was — and to which the president is — implacably opposed, but it is hardly “senseless.” By the early 1930s, the Nazi party had hundreds of thousands of devoted members and repeatedly attracted a third of the votes in German elections; its political leaders campaigned on a platform comprising 25 non-senseless points, including the “unification of all Germans,” a demand for “land and territory for the sustenance of our people,” and an assertion that “no Jew can be a member of the race.” Suffice it to say, many sensible Germans were persuaded. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33442236 [link to www.nationalreview.com] Right Wing Fascism reveals itself. You are the ultimate moran. Nazi Party is a left wing party... 1) No (how many times no) -- the Nazi's were right -wing and that is a historical fact (despite so many morons on the net making up bs) 2) NR is right-wing DEFENDING the Nazis. See 1. 3) So why don't you deal with 2? Left and right are not remotely the same almost reversed in Europe compared to the US. American parties do not fit well with in the same named European parties, Americas conservative vs. liberal is very very different then views of the same terms in Europe. Read through the entire McCarthey hearings… Joseph Kennedy, enough said. I'm only human, it's my biggest flaw. We must all realize a sink a chair and a pillow are all luxuries of home and a soldiers helmet takes the place of all three. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14398639 United States 02/02/2013 04:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33475192 United States 02/02/2013 05:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33475192 United States 02/02/2013 05:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |