Are divorced Christians condemned to hell?

So you've studied at the graduate school level about the Gnostic texts? I doubt that. What I imagine is you've read perhaps one book, and maybe seen several websites, and so declare yourself as an authority.

If you're an AC, then you're obviously not who I'm talking about in that quote above, are you? You can get red karma, and have not amassed red karma.

You are leading people down a false path though. Don't you feel it yourself?

You are tainted by doctrine, Silly. You're tainted by Gnostic teachings. That's OK, there's Free Will. You can choose to reject Yeshua. God isn't going to force you to believe.

You're making bad choices, and yet, I know in your heart that you wouldn't spend so much time searching in vain. You have a spiritual side and you want the truth desperately. But it's staring you right in the face and you're ignoring it.

Last Edited by Don'tBeAfraid on 02/01/2013 06:07 PM

If that is the case, I hope you learn how to form arguments instead of just preaching. If not, you will be talking to the hand and I will ignore you.

Like here, name any place more sadistic tyhan hell and tell us why God created it and what about it gives him pleasure.

Note how I quote to back up what I say. Learn to do it right or begone.

Revelation 4:11
Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created.

I also ignore those that do not answer simple questions like the one I asked you here.

Regards
DL

You're hardly ignoring me. You're engaging me. Perhaps even enraged by me. That makes me laugh.

You have puerile ideas about God and God's intentions. Why do you lie about God?

You're gaining red karma by the day, and it has no bearing on being a Gnostic. It has to do with your espousal of hate and condemning people.

Quite frankly you're no expert on Gnostic thought.

Last Edited by Don'tBeAfraid on 02/01/2013 06:11 PM

I am not Gnostic.
I am a truther.
all I want is truth.

and yes Issa is Yeshua

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

the first time it is used is Issa



[link to www.ancestry.com]

Issa became Iesous when the Romans wrote it
in Greek in the Gospels. Then later it got
translated into Hebrew as Yeshua.

It existed as Issa before it was Yeshua and before
it was Iesous and Before it was translated to English
as Jesus.

It's all the same person !!

Cessarian = Issa = Yeshua = Iesous = Jesus

Mephisto, The Great Trickster and Lord of Flies

He offers three riddles to humanity

First one has been solved

Shall we see if we can communicate?

I will give you that God may have loved the world.

If a sacrifice was needed though, I would suggest that a god who loved his son would not send him but would step up himself.

As above so below.

If you decided that a human sacrifice was required, would you step up or would you send a loved son?

I think that sons should bury fathers and not the reverse.

A simple question. Do you agree?

Regards
DL

You attached the wrong link in as your evidence for the word Issa doesn't appear there.

Tell that to the 60% of Christians that are divorced.

If your best advice is for her to stay till he kills her. You are a prick.

Regards
DL

you claim I am leading people down a false path ???
lol

the church has already done that for 2,000 yrs.
I am trying to correct it.

And no I don't feel it.
I feel like I am spreading truth
which is what the world needs more of
instead of the lies of the past 2,000
years.

Yeshua was given to him only after the
New Testament Greek version was translated
into Hebrew texts. The Greek version
came before the Hebrew version.

So how can you pray to Yeshua if that was
never his name while he was alive ???

The earliest Gnostic gospels is around 280 AD. That's way way later than say the Magdalene document or any of the Biblical Gospels.

They were rejected because they were all over the place. It was clear that they were false teaching and hence heretical.

There's only a handful of Gnostic believers in the world. Why? Well it's not like people are organizing and building churches. They're a handful of people who are interested in things like the gospel of thomas.

Basically you're following a dead religion that died out because it wasn't interesting enough to get people to believe in it.

Honestly the OP misreprepresents himself to Christians. If you want to believe in the Gnostic texts, knock yourself out, but you're never going to get a lot of support, because over and over, while they are interesting, it's obvious that they're fake from an academic and rigorous look at their authenticity. They're the result of heretical teachings by Greeks.

Last Edited by Don'tBeAfraid on 02/01/2013 06:25 PM

So they are denied the opportunity to find loving life mates.

Not very nice coming from a God of love. Rather anti-Christ I would say.

But then again, what can one expect from a pedophile protecting organization.

Regards
DL

then you are not reading

[link to www.ancestry.com]

Issa Name Meaning
Arabic (mainly Lebanon and Syria): from the personal name Isa, Arabic form of Hebrew Yeshua, Greek Iesous (see Jesus)

also refer here

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Ancestory.com is a website for geneology, not an academic site! Come on! Be serious.

That's a totally illogical way to prove the validity of your assertions.

And you cannot prove the Gnostic texts were written earlier than the Biblical Gospels and so, the Gnostic gospels are an afterthought. Therefore, how can some made up story almost 200 years later be considered the true story??? That makes me incredulous.

the whole Bible is heretical
from Genesis to Revelations.

It started out a fabrication and was
changed many times to suit the agenda
of the church at the time it was
edited.

The Torah version of Genesis had 4 different
authors from 4 different time periods.

How can it be God's word if it was changed
to suit the church ??

refer to Univ of Tel-Aviv research
entitled Ghostwriting the Torah

[link to phys.org]

What kind of spiritual person talks like that! It's hysterical! You're the worst example of a devout person! It's utter nonsense what you say.

I'm more inclinded to believe you're a Satanist than a Gnostic.

No
Issa (Jesus) came to reclaim his
Egyptian birthright to rule Egypt
by using spirituality learned in
Tibet.

The Romans re-wrote his message
to create Christianity which was
a Psy-Op to subjugate and divide
the warring Hebrew Tribes with Rome.

He didn't come to save anybody
other than himself. The Romans twisted
it suit their agenda.

Who's arguing that the Bible didn't have many writers? No one. The Bible is God's inspired Word, given to the writers. Is it so hard to believe that God inspired people to write the Bible? Hardly, for millions believe that, and billions have through out history.

How many believe in the Gnostic gospels? A handful of people. It basically died out. Even when the texts were found, they weren't compeling.

Last Edited by Don'tBeAfraid on 02/01/2013 06:34 PM

You see the whole point here, is not anything to do with divorce. You folks wish to convince people to accept your poorly documented beliefs and as such you've basically fabricated a reason to teach people in a duplicitous manner.

If you're that insincere, then of course people give you red karma.

Why not just be honest and create a Gnostic topic?

I could give a shit less about Gnostic Gospels.
I have already told you I am NOT Gnostic.
I am a truther.

You keep labeling me as a Gnostic to
suit your own agenda.

very interesting that God waits until
1392 to finish his inspiration.

or was that because Moses had it wrong
and they corrected it in 1392 ???

so, was Moses not inspired enough
to get Genesis correct when he
originally started it ???

Isn't it amazing that someone seeking spiritual truth talks this way?

Yes.

Also, those that eat shellfish, or wear garments made out of two kinds of thread.

What are you going on and on about? Where you're proof that the Torah was still being composed in 1392? And what pray tell does that have to do with divorce?

Last Edited by Don'tBeAfraid on 02/01/2013 06:47 PM

isn't it amazing that a so called
Christian emphatically supports
and distributes known lies ???

pot meet kettle

[link to www.dailymotion.com]

Right! Talk about a whopper of a story! And you question the most document ancient text in history against that nonsense?

1392 was used as an hypothetical example only.
nobody knows when the Torah got changed because
most of the old manuscripts never agree
textually with each other to make a solid
comparison.

just exactly like the Codex Sinaticus does not
match the KJV Holy Bible.

So basically you just fabricated a date and tried to pull that off as evidence? In other words, you lied.

Basically this total topic is complete manure. It has nothing to do with the topic title. It's a weak attempt by some quasi-Gnostics that have no academic training to discredit the Bible.

Very lame. Worst, allegedly these are spiritual people trying to make divorced people guilty.

Extremely lame.