Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,906 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 66,881
Pageviews Today: 92,449Threads Today: 22Posts Today: 482
12:43 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

DEC. 10 WAS THE DAY They Planned For Sandy Hook - Not Dec. 14

 
13th-Century
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 32527598
Canada
02/01/2013 11:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
DEC. 10 WAS THE DAY They Planned For Sandy Hook - Not Dec. 14
Quote:

Events like 9/11 have demonstrated that news items about them appear almost instantly after such events. Many are complex documents that would be impossible to create in that short a period of time. If someone is preparing a false flag the most effective period to introduce your desired interpretation of the event is immediately after the event while people are still in shock. In order to meet a tight deadline there are many trusted people working in the background preparing documents and then sitting and waiting to pull the trigger and make them public the moment the event is planned to occur. These people are scattered all over and working off their own script with a time to make their information public.

CMI (Crisis Management Inc) which had author permissions on The Arlington School Website as a contractor to upload their material to the website as needed. They could upload, create links to their material, and publish news announcements all from their own offices without anyone from the School being involved.

The School shootings that took place in Sandy Hook on December 14, 2012, were originally planned to happen on December 10, 2012.

* * * * *

Now I am going to give the link to all this, with the disclaimer that I am not computer savvy at all, and I cannot follow the trail here. Others have decided this is a FIND.

In fact, the Henry Makow blog (known to some here I am sure) has an article from earlier this week stating that Aaron Schwarz was suicided because he was the first to discover this information.

So I put all this out there for inquiring minds.

[link to fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com]
13th-Century (OP)

User ID: 32527598
Canada
02/01/2013 11:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DEC. 10 WAS THE DAY They Planned For Sandy Hook - Not Dec. 14
This was published January 26, and I have just found it.

The author is Peter Offermann, and he adds, at the same link above:

"There is an enormous amount of corroborating evidence that I described before at Fellowship of the Minds.

"If you find the information above compelling enough to look further, and if I survive to tell about it, this discussion will be continued."
Skepticnumberone

User ID: 33436485
United States
02/01/2013 11:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DEC. 10 WAS THE DAY They Planned For Sandy Hook - Not Dec. 14
Cloak and dagger? Be safe and God be with you.
Skepticnumberone
New Age Messiah

User ID: 9993365
United States
02/01/2013 11:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DEC. 10 WAS THE DAY They Planned For Sandy Hook - Not Dec. 14
For someday. bump
13th-Century (OP)

User ID: 32527598
Canada
02/01/2013 11:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DEC. 10 WAS THE DAY They Planned For Sandy Hook - Not Dec. 14
Peter, the author, has spent the last week analyzing this on the RSS level, and in a debate with somebody named Jeremy who works for the school district as an offsite computer administrator for a company called Crisis Management (?), who has been, let us say, a little less than forthcoming.

This appears in the comments section on the above link, from Peter:

Peter | February 1, 2013 at 9:21 am | Reply

To reassure those of you who might be wondering if I will ever get around to the critical point of addressing the actual evidence in this situation, I will produce a short schedule here of what remains to be done and when each step is likely to occur.

TODAY Feb 1, 2013.

Present 2 more pieces of information about the Arlington Schools Website.

Answer Dr Eowyn’s questions about the site.

Address a point Jeremy made about the website.

Move on to demonstrating how Crisis Management Inc. (CMI) fits into the events that occurred.

All of the above will become important to understand as we examine the actual evidence.

The (CMI) analysis might bleed into tomorrow.)

Feb 2, 2013.

Possibly finish up with CMI

Demolish the official explanation for the documents that pre-dated the events at Sandy Hook.

Feb 3, 2013.

Prove the documents came into existence before the event they announce occurred.

Propose how the documents really came into existence using the information presented to date.

Feb 4, 2013.

Prove how the documents came to be in Google’s cache.

Present a summary of how all the pieces of the puzzle presented here fit together, and what that means.

Present a summary that could be used as a guide to gather further evidence to firm up what has been presented to date from possible and probable to proven.

The summaries may bleed into Feb 5, 2013.

Peter
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5469786
United States
02/01/2013 11:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DEC. 10 WAS THE DAY They Planned For Sandy Hook - Not Dec. 14
archive.org still has that page indexed
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14195125
United States
02/01/2013 11:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: DEC. 10 WAS THE DAY They Planned For Sandy Hook - Not Dec. 14
Good work! Please keep it up.

My main concern and question is: Where do we get jurisdiction for prosecution of lying officials at the various levels, and prosecution for fraud against the individuals pretending to be parents of deceased children?

The "no lawsuits filed" issue certainly has something to do with the "fraud" charges. Who has been defrauded and lost money, assets or reputation by the fraud?

The fraud has been perpetrated against the general public to in support of enabling violation of constitutional rights.

We need a constitutional lawyer.

News