LEAKED UN REPORT: Solar Activity is Climate Culprit

Thread: THIS IS IT ... The reason for all the extreme weather across the world, plus every other anomaly currently happening. (Page 15)

Way ahead of everyone.

We should name this new amazing discovery. Since the sun has such an influence on everything lets call it a "Solar System".

So once the Global warming con has been exposed for what it is ,one great big money making scam organised and dreamt up by the governments to extort money from the taxpayers to pay their exorbitant wages ,what next obviously they wont stop these taxes ,will they call them something else like the government backhander ,or tax for the sake of it wether you can afford it or not .

Ye Who Have Years

We must consider the possibility that the Solar Activity is dictated by the Solar Logos. This Logos is predicated to determine the life in this Solar System, it is the "spiritual" reality culminating at december 21-24 analogous to the physical reality that culminates June 21-24 (the birthday of John the Baptist).

Considering the excessive heat emitted by the Sun at this time we may speculate that the spiritual activity emitted by it is lessened. The World becomes more Physical, "God" is hibernating. Events run their fatal course. Man is not inclined anymore to intuit any kind of morality:

The most uncanny of all guests has arrived.
In these most difficult of circumstances, the strongest creature shall come to dominate. The Solar System itself is a Breeding Ground.

Spell bind cancelled

the truth WILL out and al gore should be strung up by his oily little googlies

OF COURSE

I heard this a while back - that scientists knew that at least 30% or more of the heating issue was caused by the sun, not the environmental factors - but they did not want to broadcast this fact because they didn't want people to think that they could relax on environmental issues and just get lazy about it - since that is still a factor and could be made worse.

Derp

Highly suspicious considering the sources, but even if it were true, it's moot.

It's like having a leak in your boat and saying you aren't going to bother bailing water because more is just going to come in.

Carbon Dioxide insulates our planet and traps heat.
Regardless of the output of the sun, lowering the amount of Carbon Dioxide WILL have an effect on the amount of heat our planet retains from this daily bombardment of radiation. Even if it's a small effect, it's the only thing we can do, right?

We have no control over what the Sun does.
We do have a measure of control over what is going into our atmosphere.


And FYI, though we're only like a third of the way there...there is an upper limit of CO2 content in our atmosphere, something like 1000ppm...where every time our planet reaches that range...an extinction event occurs.


IMO you have to be pretty brainwashed to argue *against* cleaning up a mess because it will impact how much money a corporation makes...

Centuries from now, people will look back in awe at how the petroleum industry was able to game you mooks with such ease.

The lesson? All you have to do is associate each side of the argument with a political faction, and let their inane ego-associations do the fighting for you.

Take the time to listen to what Eric Dollard is saying.

Smart man right there.

The U.N. report also says that the effect of solar activity will be “much smaller than the warming expected from increases in [man-made] greenhouse gases.”

I'm not sure you retards you should rely on an IPCC report to DISPROVE the IPCC, especially when the IPCC disagrees with your own assertion that solar activity is a significant factor... but you guys need anything you can get to pretend that carbon isn't being released into the atmosphere in record concentrations, I guess....

fuck me doorbert i love your threads but this is old news people been saying this for a while now.

hmmmm.

Al Gore is a moldy dog turd

You need to take some real science courses. You are obviously just a parrot for Gore and company.

Whoa... that actually pretty compelling.
Being an astrologer I see merit in this idea. But I 've no way to verify it.

Sooo from your imagined knowledge on the subject ,just one thing jumped on on me ,*****where every time our planet reaches that range...an extinction event occurs*****.
So it basiclly means no matter what is done inevitably there will be an ELE ,and this is because of what exactly ,the last ELE and there have been several by the way was the Ordovician–Silurian extinction event are you "trying" to tell us that it was man who put up so much CO2 into the atmosphere that led to that ,You are a lemon who doesn't understand what he is typing and just another freak who loves your glorious leader who made millions from this con Al Gore

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz​z

Considering what Dollard said concerning the sun being
a transformer, receiving energy from 'somewhere'...

and... his reference to the last minimum being so weak..

and...the possibility of the upcoming minimum being even weaker..

and our gradual entrance into the 'fluff',

are they related..?


Could this 'fluff' be interfering with the sun's conduit of
the external source...?
Bleeding off energy, as it were..

We have been in the fluff for a couple or few millennia. We are close to the boundary of the Fluff, or so they surmise, which means we are close to an Interface Region.

But, there are areas within the Fluff that have higher density plasma. My personal thought is that at the boundary areas, there is more magnetism and charges than when away from the boundary.

There ARE 'cords' of currents that connect celestial bodies. Birkeland Currents. This is a scalar pattern, it seems, as our own magnetosphere has a connection to the sun via Magnetic Flux Tubes. So, it stands to reason that, yes, conduits are occurring through scalar forms, hooking all the way to galactic center.

Even from galactic center, there are electric currents connecting galaxies, and super clusters...etc.

From what I understand.. the theory is that the sun is fueled by an influx of neutrons from cosmic currents.
I wonder if variability of plasma density is partially responsible for anomalic solar cycles.
Also, if magnetic fields are stronger or more variable near the boundary, it would seem that this would affect the strength and polarity of cosmic current.