Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,300 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 116,827
Pageviews Today: 190,774Threads Today: 60Posts Today: 1,175
02:22 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1922136
United States
02/05/2013 03:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
Anyone happen to get the name of the Doctor, who declared everyone dead, and decided to leave 'em all laying in their own blood for 3 days? Just asking.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33743513
United States
02/05/2013 03:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
You probably need to just take this down. It's obvious you didn't use the software correctly. It's too long with too much irrelevant conversation (yes, I get it was 2 a.m. and you were discouraged, but IDGAF). I am also unconvinced that particular software is anything special. Recognizing faces and unquestionably matching faces aren't the same.

You MAY have a link with the X Files episode, IDK. I know you can't post an entire clip from X Files, but you can reference bits of it (as someone has done). I didn't watch the whole thing, my battery ran out. It's that freaking long. So apologies if you eventually explained the X Files connection in the video.

But, here is the thing. There are some people with acting backgrounds involved with S.H. However, actors have kids, too. So, unless you can prove the actor has no kids or is posing with different kids than their own or something of that nature, then proving someone was involved with acting won't make that much difference.
rubyblue
User ID: 33755583
Germany
02/05/2013 04:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute



HERE IS SOME REAL RESEARCH being done by someone in the know!


This shows you that it was ALL a made for tv movie!

Why would they need to use a green or blue screen for REAL news? Hmmmmm!

It's all lies! No Evidence of a real crime!
 Quoting: ZEROeffect


The video is TOTAL BULLSHIT. how bout them apples?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16293101


I guess your apples are spoiled and you didn't watch the vid!

That, or you have no idea how a blue/green screen works, or how the programs work for them!
 Quoting: ZEROeffect


It's called chromatic aberration, you idiot.

It happens all the time, especially in this digital era.

You really need to educate yourself.
 Quoting: the8track


On a blog somebody hinted to Blue screen manipulation: [link to www.youtube.com]

This debunker sais this was simply "Chromatic aberration". But it's not!
On [link to en.wikipedia.org] we read: "In optics, chromatic aberration (CA, also called achromatism or chromatic distortion) is a type of distortion in which there is a failure of a lens to focus all colors to the same convergence point. It occurs because lenses have a different refractive index for different wavelengths of light (the dispersion of the lens). The refractive index decreases with increasing wavelength.
Chromatic aberration manifests itself as "fringes" of color along boundaries that separate dark and bright parts of the image, because each color in the optical spectrum cannot be focused at a single common point. Since the focal length f of a lens is dependent on the refractive index n, different wavelengths of light will be focused on different positions".

Yes, "fringes" and "colour"

1) "FRINGES"!
This blue spot is definitely blue screen manipulation - because it is not(!) at a fringe: [link to s1.directupload.net]

Also there is no colour!

2) Colour: These "aberrations" can only happen with "COLOUR" because of different wavelengths and thus different focuses.
But here is no(!) colour at all:
a) The cap before the white shirt: [link to s14.directupload.net]
b) No colour, just black grey and white: [link to s1.directupload.net]
c)House wall:. Pure white plus shadow of the beams: [link to s7.directupload.net] .

So this material was definitely fabricated with "Blue screen"!
Integrity101

User ID: 31628188
United States
02/05/2013 07:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
I can tell those are not the same people without any facial recognition software...looking at your little window that is open, in my little window....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1276709
Canada
02/05/2013 08:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
Dear makers of this op video. Please put Down the mouse. Then take your wife into the closet and f her in the ass real good and deep

Please never make another video about xfiles and facial recognition again as you are both to stupid to live

I'm very sorry that you had to hear this as I'm sure your both retarded!

You are what is wrong with conspiracy forums

Your like the dirty idiot rednecks of this community

Your kids should all be slapped upside their heads for teaching you how to record and upload videos!

Please throw out your computer and get outside

At least type into your run menu this
Delete
the8track

User ID: 23562436
United States
02/05/2013 10:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
...


The video is TOTAL BULLSHIT. how bout them apples?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16293101


I guess your apples are spoiled and you didn't watch the vid!

That, or you have no idea how a blue/green screen works, or how the programs work for them!
 Quoting: ZEROeffect


It's called chromatic aberration, you idiot.

It happens all the time, especially in this digital era.

You really need to educate yourself.
 Quoting: the8track


On a blog somebody hinted to Blue screen manipulation: [link to www.youtube.com]

This debunker sais this was simply "Chromatic aberration". But it's not!
On [link to en.wikipedia.org] we read: "In optics, chromatic aberration (CA, also called achromatism or chromatic distortion) is a type of distortion in which there is a failure of a lens to focus all colors to the same convergence point. It occurs because lenses have a different refractive index for different wavelengths of light (the dispersion of the lens). The refractive index decreases with increasing wavelength.
Chromatic aberration manifests itself as "fringes" of color along boundaries that separate dark and bright parts of the image, because each color in the optical spectrum cannot be focused at a single common point. Since the focal length f of a lens is dependent on the refractive index n, different wavelengths of light will be focused on different positions".

Yes, "fringes" and "colour"

1) "FRINGES"!
This blue spot is definitely blue screen manipulation - because it is not(!) at a fringe: [link to s1.directupload.net]

Also there is no colour!

2) Colour: These "aberrations" can only happen with "COLOUR" because of different wavelengths and thus different focuses.
But here is no(!) colour at all:
a) The cap before the white shirt: [link to s14.directupload.net]
b) No colour, just black grey and white: [link to s1.directupload.net]
c)House wall:. Pure white plus shadow of the beams: [link to s7.directupload.net] .

So this material was definitely fabricated with "Blue screen"!
 Quoting: rubyblue 33755583


You cant just quote a wikipedia article, litigiously misinterpret it, and act like you have a legitimate point to make. You clearly lack any experience in digital media. There are any number of reasons why a blue dot would show up on a camera or why a section of siding lacks full detail under sun exposure. Common sense and basic experience tells you that these things have nothing to do with a blue screen glitch.

Your other photos are clearly color fringe examples.

Produce these same results on a blue screen and see what happens, because it won't. Yet I can provide you countless examples of fringes, sun spots, and over exposure.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33797420
United States
02/06/2013 08:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
Can u elaborate on this?

Adam and Eve TV Commercial

"When the pebbles skip across the water, only but one will sink. Three smooth skip over the body, while the rough and jagged trip

over and join. Christmas delivers fulfilment of the list. Who is naughty to be left out? SanduskY has a Point. Adam holds the fire

which was sparked by Christmas Eve. Watch the fire roast the Lamb as the Lamb is Sandy and Points towards CHRISTMAS EVE.....
CamelToeFan
User ID: 21166040
United States
02/06/2013 09:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
This is clearly disinfo. Nobody in their right mind would think the actors presented in this video are the witnesses from Sandy Hook. All it takes is a quick google search to see current pictures of the actors and they are CLEARLY not the same people from Sandy Hook. At first I thought this was a joke, but now I'm thinking this is a deliberate attempt to discredit the theories surround the Sandy Hook mystery and to make the people who are asking the right questions look like morons.
 Quoting: challenger13 18602144


I agree. The "actor" comparison is way off, and turns people the other way...which is why it does seem deliberate. Plus, there is so much else that can easily be pointed out, I don't know why some people have to resort to the "actor" thing in the first place.
 Quoting: Zuzu's Petals


This is a hoax clearly not the same people. Their software sucks IMO.
I believe there is a problem at Sandy Hook but I am not willing to grasp at straw!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33806923
United States
02/06/2013 11:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
A connection?

What the Sandusky Verdict Means for Survivors
[link to www.rainn.org]

[link to bleacherreport.com]

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Dark Night
User ID: 33796495
Canada
02/06/2013 12:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
WOW!!!!!

I just found this website, Here's another link to the Dark knight rising movie. This is unreal. Beyond coincidence.

This could also solve the riddle.

Here is a link to the screenshot

[link to bayimg.com]
Psalm91Comforts
User ID: 23432182
United States
02/07/2013 01:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
I came across this on accident while following threads related to the x-files (my all time fave show)...and I just gotta say, you are NUTS. Anyone who can look at the picture of Sally Cox and see the same person as Kari Turner needs more than glasses,they need a psyce eval. And why, pray tell, did you not use any CURRENT pictures of Kari Turner? They are all over Google. And here is a newsflash for ya', she is not just some extras actress, she played a LEAD ROLE in the television show JAG for something like 7 or 8 years. I would hardly call that an unknown...certainly not a good choice to "play" a school nurse. She has aged well and is a beutiful woman...not that Sally Cox is ugly, but she is clearly not an actress. But seriously it is people like you who make conservatives and republicans look like kooks. Stop it...just stop it. So yes, this is coming from a ultra conservative republican, christian, under the age of 30 (gasp! we exisit!). The tragedy that took place that day broke my heart,along with so many others. If you want to focus on what the govt is doing wrong how about talking about the real injustice...how they have exploited the families and memories of those children to further their agenda in gun control. p.s. here is a link to a picture of Kari Turner from 2009, just to help you out a bit.... [link to www.zimbio.com]
the8track

User ID: 24833013
United States
02/07/2013 11:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
I came across this on accident while following threads related to the x-files (my all time fave show)...and I just gotta say, you are NUTS. Anyone who can look at the picture of Sally Cox and see the same person as Kari Turner needs more than glasses,they need a psyce eval. And why, pray tell, did you not use any CURRENT pictures of Kari Turner? They are all over Google. And here is a newsflash for ya', she is not just some extras actress, she played a LEAD ROLE in the television show JAG for something like 7 or 8 years. I would hardly call that an unknown...certainly not a good choice to "play" a school nurse. She has aged well and is a beutiful woman...not that Sally Cox is ugly, but she is clearly not an actress. But seriously it is people like you who make conservatives and republicans look like kooks. Stop it...just stop it. So yes, this is coming from a ultra conservative republican, christian, under the age of 30 (gasp! we exisit!). The tragedy that took place that day broke my heart,along with so many others. If you want to focus on what the govt is doing wrong how about talking about the real injustice...how they have exploited the families and memories of those children to further their agenda in gun control. p.s. here is a link to a picture of Kari Turner from 2009, just to help you out a bit.... [link to www.zimbio.com]
 Quoting: Psalm91Comforts 23432182
rubyblue
User ID: 33876809
Germany
02/07/2013 01:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
I'm referring now to the video "Sandy Hook News Chopper Helicopter": [link to www.youtube.com] .

Let's take a look at this man, who stands to the left of a door of the firehouse and at 9:47 gets food from a lady. See the snapshot: [link to s1.directupload.net] .

And after that - like already before - this man always waves and beckons the people, who come out of the door to the right in the video, to go trough the door next to him.
Now: You would never give parents, who are happy that their kids survived but also still shocked about the massacre, commands of where to go next!
This even less as parents who just left the firehouse (and already had met their kids) have no reason to enter the house again!

This man has definitely the function of an organiser of a movie set, who (from out of view of the camera ) organises those actors who are to be "pedestrians".
In a real movie these "pedestrians" to be organised look like in this trailer at 0:13: [link to www.cinemagia.ro]

This proves that these people in the yard of the firehouse are not at all "parents" of the Sandy Hook Elementary kids but actors of a organized scene.

Also: We are told that all children, who survived (600?) are in the firehouse. But: 600 children could have up to 1,200 parents. And even only 400 children could have up to 800 parents. It is absolutely impossible to see between 800 and 1,200 parents before the firehouse!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34156558
United States
02/11/2013 11:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Sandy Hook - Final Evidence - Case Closed - Time to Prosecute
If you want people's eyes to open, you've got to make it very simple. I'm interested in this case, but your first post seems like a LOT of work to go through.

Short and sweet and to the point if you want to wake up the sheep
 Quoting: Zuzu's Petals


I agree, after the dumbing down education system we now have and have had for about 20 years, the only thing that reaches those people brought up in that system is FAST FOOD VISUAL INFORMATION. You start asking them to read, dig, digest, etc, you lose them. Thought you should understand that. Maybe half the population gives enough of a shit to really dig and digest and understand the serious peril we are in, so don't waste your time and breath except on selected non fast food sites where the higher educated and more esoteric readers visit. But then you are dealing with a minority.





GLP