Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,892 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 39,044
Pageviews Today: 55,719Threads Today: 18Posts Today: 256
12:28 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..

 
Sir Griffo
Sir Griffo

User ID: 1557679
Australia
02/04/2013 12:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Here we go.....
Are they sure it wasn't North Korea?

What a crock of Shite...,

The CIA has allegedly always known that Iran and not Libya was behind the deadly 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 which came down over Lockerbie, Scotland causing the deaths of 270 people.

Ignored for almost 25-years as an unverified conspiracy theory, the respected New York Times journalist and Middle-East expert Robert Worth claims in a recent piece that a former CIA operative confirmed to him an Iranian role in the December bombing.

The controversial claim that 'the best intelligence' on the Lockerbie bombing leads to Iran, rewrites a quarter of a century of accepted history that Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's Libya ordered the terror outrage as revenge for a 1986 U.S. attack on the North African country.

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]
Sir Griffo (OP)
Sir Griffo

User ID: 21659457
Australia
02/04/2013 12:54 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Iran also were responsible for 9/11, the Brighton bomb attack on Margret Thatcher, the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and the Argentinan invasion of the Falklands...
Sir Griffo (OP)
Sir Griffo

User ID: 21659457
Australia
02/04/2013 12:56 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Iran also were responsible for 9/11, the Brighton bomb attack on Margret Thatcher, the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and the Argentinan invasion of the Falklands...
 Quoting: Sir Griffo


And the lights going out at the Super Bowl..
RogerAbbott

User ID: 31759556
02/04/2013 01:04 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
bump

Sigh.
More warmongering from the peaceful leaders of The US of A :/
good find OP
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32299721
United States
02/04/2013 01:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
I read Mossad did it to pin the blame on Quadaffi.
RogerAbbott

User ID: 31759556
02/04/2013 01:25 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Thread: CIA PLANTED KEY LOCKERBIE BOMBING EVIDENCE TO GET LIBYA BLAMED - 2005
Sir Griffo (OP)
Sir Griffo

User ID: 24149491
Australia
02/04/2013 01:28 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..


Well that worked... Let's see what else they can plant so they can blame Iran..
RogerAbbott

User ID: 31759556
02/04/2013 01:32 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
i was positive invasion would've taken place the week Argo hit theatres, timing was too perfect.
I don't watch TV news anymore so I wonder, would using another scapegoat for lockerbie still rile up Americans?
Sir Griffo (OP)
Sir Griffo

User ID: 24149491
Australia
02/04/2013 01:35 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
i was positive invasion would've taken place the week Argo hit theatres, timing was too perfect.
I don't watch TV news anymore so I wonder, would using another scapegoat for lockerbie still rile up Americans?
 Quoting: RogerAbbott


If someone, somewhere said Iran did it... Then that's good enough for Americans, the UN and NATO..
RogerAbbott

User ID: 31759556
02/04/2013 01:38 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
comments from the daily mail article

here we go it was weapons of mass destruction with iraq now we have an excuse to follow the yanks into iran
- mr woo , glasgow, United Kingdom, 04/2/2013 05:59
Click to rate Rating 4 Report abuse

The Americans will always try to put the blame where it suits them most in preference to letting the truth get in the way.
- ArthurS , Birmingham, United Kingdom, 04/2/2013 05:55
Click to rate Rating 12 Report abuse

I thought it was Mali.
- Mr Angry SW , Bristol, Saint Helena, 04/2/2013 05:53
Click to rate Rating 3 Report abuse

The witnesses that got Libya convicted for the Lockerbie plane disaster were each paid 4 million dollars to implicate Libya.
- Dave , London, 04/2/2013 05:34
Click to rate Rating 9 Report abuse

Spy novelist!!!! Not an actual spy. Why not contact RK Rowling or Stephen King for their theories?
- ununiform , Cardiff,UK, 04/2/2013 05:33

DM is late on this story by 1000 nautical miles. I hope the reason for dredging it up is not a pretext for attacking Iran. It had been known for ages that Libya had no hand in that Lockebie bombing. Gaddafi was just a typical uncouth, loquacious man who liked poking fingers at the West and nothing more. Anyway, he's gone now. May his soul rest in peace..
- Truth Seeker , LONDON, United Kingdom, 04/2/2013 05:12
Click to rate Rating 14 Report abuse

Yawn !!! so now we have a reason to fight Iran .......shocker. more dead soldiers for no reason.
- mitch , wolverhampton, 04/2/2013 04:40



Last Edited by RogerAbbott on 02/04/2013 01:40 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32299721
United States
02/04/2013 01:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
i was positive invasion would've taken place the week Argo hit theatres, timing was too perfect.
I don't watch TV news anymore so I wonder, would using another scapegoat for lockerbie still rile up Americans?
 Quoting: RogerAbbott


If someone, somewhere said Iran did it... Then that's good enough for Americans, the UN and NATO..
 Quoting: Sir Griffo


Sad but true.

Americans are now so eager to have enemies, they have been brainwashed to be warmongers and have become so shallow and heartless.

So many have a deep hatred for Muslims but can't find any mideast countries on a map.

So yes they won't even stop for a minute to think when the media tells them it was Iran who was responsible for Lockerbie, they will eat it up.
Sir Griffo (OP)
Sir Griffo

User ID: 14387634
Australia
02/04/2013 09:38 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28070593
United Kingdom
02/04/2013 09:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Iran also were responsible for 9/11, the Brighton bomb attack on Margret Thatcher, the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and the Argentinan invasion of the Falklands...
 Quoting: Sir Griffo


I fuckin lol'd

cruise
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4901221
Australia
02/07/2013 07:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
dam strait! i am an exspert on libya and Brother Leader Muammar Al-Gaddahfi, as i have spent 10,000+ hours over the last 5 years researching Libya and Gaddahfi, and one of the things i have got from my studys is th i know that libya and Gaddahfi had nothing to do with pan-am flight 103 or better known as the Lockerbie bombing!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18308887
United Kingdom
02/07/2013 08:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Secret documents in the high court vaults prove that Libya was not responsible, we dont know what country is mentioned in them though.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 26238410
Canada
02/07/2013 08:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Secret documents in the high court vaults prove that Libya was not responsible, we dont know what country is mentioned in them though.
 Quoting: strikeforce


smash! smash! smuhmasssh!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33764081
Taiwan
02/07/2013 08:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Here we go.....
Are they sure it wasn't North Korea?

What a crock of Shite...,

The CIA has allegedly always known that Iran and not Libya was behind the deadly 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 which came down over Lockerbie, Scotland causing the deaths of 270 people.

Ignored for almost 25-years as an unverified conspiracy theory, the respected New York Times journalist and Middle-East expert Robert Worth claims in a recent piece that a former CIA operative confirmed to him an Iranian role in the December bombing.

The controversial claim that 'the best intelligence' on the Lockerbie bombing leads to Iran, rewrites a quarter of a century of accepted history that Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's Libya ordered the terror outrage as revenge for a 1986 U.S. attack on the North African country.

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]
 Quoting: Sir Griffo


[link not allowed]

"Susan Lindauer: Lockerbie Diary-Gadhaffi, Fall Guy for CIA Drug Running

...That’s the dirty truth about Lockerbie. It ain’t nothing like you’ve been told.

Wait a darn moment—I anticipate your confusion. Libya got blamed for the Lockerbie attack. Daddy George Bush told us so! The United Nations imposed sanctions on Libya, demanding that Colonel Moammar Gadhaffi hand over two Libyans for trial. One of the two, Lameen Fhima got acquitted immediately. The other Abdelbasset Megrahi got convicted (on the most flimsy circumstantial evidence that overlooked endless contradictions). Libya paid $2.7 billion in damages—amounting to $10 million per family death— to make the U.N. sanctions go away, and expressed a sort of non-apology for the deaths—while never acknowledging its involvement in the conspiracy.

So Libya was innocent the whole time? In a word, yes."

yoda
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 18308887
United Kingdom
02/07/2013 08:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Lockerbie was revenge for this:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

The Lockerbie Bombing and the U.S.S. Vincennes

[link to www.serendipity.li]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30057079
Canada
02/07/2013 08:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
The biggest warcrimers and false flag makers(they do it cause they crave to rule the world) will always be and shall be doing it as long they stay a SUPER power; USA(the bully) and Israel(bullying the bully) by blaming countries pitty countries.

bsflag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33897541
Australia
02/07/2013 08:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
dam strait! i am an exspert on libya and Brother Leader Muammar Al-Gaddahfi, as i have spent 10,000+ hours over the last 5 years researching Libya and Gaddahfi, and one of the things i have got from my studys is th i know that libya and Gaddahfi had nothing to do with pan-am flight 103 or better known as the Lockerbie bombing!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4901221


bsflag


you'd know first how to spell his name, and second, he admitted involvement
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30938598
United States
02/07/2013 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Eventually we plan on blaming Russia...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30938598
United States
02/07/2013 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Eventually we plan on blaming Russia...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33764081
Taiwan
02/07/2013 08:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
dam strait! i am an exspert on libya and Brother Leader Muammar Al-Gaddahfi, as i have spent 10,000+ hours over the last 5 years researching Libya and Gaddahfi, and one of the things i have got from my studys is th i know that libya and Gaddahfi had nothing to do with pan-am flight 103 or better known as the Lockerbie bombing!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4901221


bsflag


you'd know first how to spell his name, and second, he admitted involvement
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33897541


Your flag needs to go down the memory hole. He didn't admit jack, but did what he had to do to end the sanctions. *blackmailed*
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4901221
Australia
02/07/2013 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
dam strait! i am an exspert on libya and Brother Leader Muammar Al-Gaddahfi, as i have spent 10,000+ hours over the last 5 years researching Libya and Gaddahfi, and one of the things i have got from my studys is th i know that libya and Gaddahfi had nothing to do with pan-am flight 103 or better known as the Lockerbie bombing!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4901221


bsflag


you'd know first how to spell his name, and second, he admitted involvement
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33897541


Your flag needs to go down the memory hole. He didn't admit jack, but did what he had to do to end the sanctions. *blackmailed*
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33764081


well said mate, respect!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33906898
02/07/2013 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
It will be interesting to see just how Obama ties the next mass shooting (just before his SOTU speech) to pro-2nd Amendment groups based in Iran funded by Chinese hackers working for Russian credit card thieves.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33375844
Canada
02/07/2013 08:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
bumpbumpbumpbumpbump
Moking-shit

User ID: 33894498
Belgium
02/07/2013 09:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Why not blame Mossad??? Their hand is everywhere...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4901221
Australia
02/08/2013 05:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 29117977
United States
02/08/2013 05:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Iran is directly responsible for the sinking of the Titanic.....word!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33926367
United Kingdom
02/08/2013 05:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..


Yup,it was them pesky jews again
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33928660
Switzerland
02/08/2013 05:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: So it was IRAN not LIBYA to blame for Lockerbie..
Here we go.....
Are they sure it wasn't North Korea?

What a crock of Shite...,

The CIA has allegedly always known that Iran and not Libya was behind the deadly 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 which came down over Lockerbie, Scotland causing the deaths of 270 people.

Ignored for almost 25-years as an unverified conspiracy theory, the respected New York Times journalist and Middle-East expert Robert Worth claims in a recent piece that a former CIA operative confirmed to him an Iranian role in the December bombing.

The controversial claim that 'the best intelligence' on the Lockerbie bombing leads to Iran, rewrites a quarter of a century of accepted history that Colonel Muammar Gaddafi's Libya ordered the terror outrage as revenge for a 1986 U.S. attack on the North African country.

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk]
 Quoting: Sir Griffo


It Has Happened Here in America: The Police State is Real

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
February 07, 2013

The Bush regime’s response to 9/11 and the Obama regime’s validation of this response have destroyed accountable democratic government in the United States.

So much unaccountable power has been concentrated in the executive branch that the US Constitution is no longer an operable document.

Whether a person believes the official story of 9/11 which rests on unproven government assertions or believes the documented evidence provided by a large number of scientists, first responders, and structural engineers and architects, the result is the same. 9/11 was used to create an open-ended “war on terror” and a police state. It is extraordinary that so many Americans believe that “it can’t happen here” when it already has.

We have had a decade of highly visible evidence of the construction of a police state:
the PATRIOT Act, illegal spying on Americans in violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act,
the initiation of wars of aggression–war crimes under the Nuremberg Standard–based on intentional lies,
the Justice Department’s concocted legal memos justifying the executive branch’s violation of domestic and international laws against
torture, the indefinite detention of US citizens in violation of the constitutionally protected rights of habeas corpus and due process,
the use of secret evidence and secret “expert witnesses” who cannot be cross-examined against defendants in trials,
the creation of military tribunals in order to evade federal courts, secret legal memos giving the president authority to launch preemptive cyber attacks on any country without providing evidence that the country constitutes a threat, and the Obama regime’s murder of US citizens without evidence or due process.

As if this were not enough, the Obama regime now creates new presidential powers by crafting secret laws, refusing to disclose the legal reasoning on which the asserted power rests. In other words, laws now originate in secret executive branch memos and not in acts of Congress. Congress? We don’t need no stinking Congress.

Despite laws protecting whistleblowers and the media and the US Military Code which requires soldiers to report war crimes, whistleblowers such as CIA agent John Kiriakou, media such as Julian Assange, and soldiers such as Bradley Manning are persecuted and prosecuted for revealing US government crimes. [link to www.informationclearinghouse.info] The criminals go free, and those who report the crimes are punished.

The justification for the American police state is the “war on terror,” a hoax kept alive by the FBI’s “sting operations.” Normally speaking, a sting operation is when a policewoman poses as a prostitute in order to ensnare a “John,” or a police officer poses as a drug dealer or user in order to ensnare drug users or dealers. The FBI’s “sting operation” goes beyond these victimless crimes that fill up US prisons.

The FBI’s sting operations are different. They are just as victimless as no plot ever happens, but the FBI doesn’t pose as bomb makers for terrorists who have a plot but lack the weapon. Instead, the FBI has the plot and looks for a hapless or demented person or group, or for a Muslim enraged over the latest Washington insult to him and/or his religion. When the FBI locates its victim, its agents approach the selected perpetrator pretending to be Al-Qaeda or some such and ply the selected perpetrator with money, the promise of fame, or threats until the victim signs on to the FBI’s plot and is arrested.

Trevor Aaronson in his book, The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s War on Terrorism, documents that the FBI has so far concocted 150 “terrorist plots” and that almost all of the other “terrorist cases” are cases unrelated to terrorism, such as immigration, with a terror charge tacked on. See video
The presstitute American media doesn’t ask why, if there is so much real terrorism requiring an American war against it, the FBI has to invent and solicit terrorist plots.

Neither does the media inquire how the Taliban, which resists the US invasion and attempted occupation of Afghanistan, fighting the US superpower to a standstill after 11 years, came to be designated as terrorists. Nor does the US presstitute media want to know how tribesmen in remote regions of Pakistan came to be designated as “terrorists” deserving of US drone attacks on the citizens, schools and medical clinics of a country with which the US is not at war.

Instead the media protects and perpetrates the hoax that has given America the police state. The American media has become Leni Riefenstahl, as has Hollywood with the anti-Muslim propaganda film, Zero Dark Thirty. This propaganda film is a hate crime that spreads Islamophobia. Nevertheless, the film is likely to win awards and to sink Americans into both tyranny and a hundred-year war in the name of fighting the Muslim threat.

What I learned many years ago as a professor is that movies are important molders of Americans‘ attitudes. Once, after giving a thorough explanation of the Russian Revolution that led to communist rule, a student raised his hand and said: “That’s not the way it happened in the movie.”

At first I thought he was making a witty joke, but then I realized that he thought that the truth resided in the movie, not in the professor who was well versed in the subject. Ever since I have been puzzled how the US has survived for so long, considering the ignorance of its population. Americans have lived in the power of the US economy. Now that this power is waning, sooner or later Americans will have to come to terms with reality.

It is a reality that will be unfamiliar to them.

Some Americans claim that we have had police states during other wartimes and that once the war on terror is won, the police state will be dismantled. Others claim that government will be judicious in its use of the power and that if you are doing nothing wrong you have nothing to fear.

These are reassurances from the deluded. The Bush/Obama police state is far more comprehensive than Lincoln’s, Wilson’s, or Roosevelt’s, and the war on terror is open-ended and is already three times longer than World War II. The Police State is acquiring “squatter’s rights.”

Moreover, the government needs the police state in order to protect itself from accountability for its crimes, lies, and squandering of taxpayers‘ money. New precedents for executive power have been created in conjunction with the Federalist Society which, independent of the war on terror, advocates the “unitary executive” theory, which claims the president has powers not subject to check by Congress and the Judiciary. In other words, the president is a dictator if he prefers to be.

The Obama regime is taking advantage of this Republican theory. The regime has used the Republican desire for a strong executive outside the traditional checks and balances together with the fear factor to complete the creation of the Bush/Cheney police state.

As Lawrence M. Stratton and I documented in our book, The Tyranny Of Good Intentions, prior to 9/11 law as a shield of the people was already losing ground to law as a weapon in the hands of the government. If the government wanted to get you, there were few if any barriers to a defendant being framed and convicted, least of all a brainwashed jury fearful of crime.

I cannot say whether the US justice system has ever served justice better than it has served the ambition of prosecutors. Already in the 1930s and 1940s US Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland and US Attorney General Robert Jackson were warning against prosecutors who sacrifice “fair dealing to build up statistics of success.” Certainly it is difficult to find in the ranks of federal prosecutors today Jackson’s “prosecutor who tempers zeal with human kindness, who seeks truth and not victims, who serves the law and not factional purposes, and who approaches his task with humility.”

Just consider the wrongful conviction of Alabama’s Democratic governor, Don Siegelman by what apparently was a Karl Rove plot to rid the South of Democratic governors. The “Democratic” Obama regime has not investigated this false prosecution or given clemency to its innocent own. Remember how quickly Bush removed the prison sentence of Cheney’s operative who revealed the name of a CIA undercover agent? The Democrats are a cowed and cowardly political party, fearful of justice, and as much a part of the corrupt police state as the Republicans.

Today the purpose of a prosecution is to serve the prosecutor’s career and that of the party that appoints him or her. A prosecutor’s career is served by high conviction rates, which require plea bargains in which the evidence against a defendant is never tested in court or before a jury, and by high profile cases, which can launch a prosecutor into a political career, as Rudy Giuliana achieved with his frame-up of Michael Milken.

Glenn Greenwald explained how Internet freedom advocate Aaron Swartz was driven to his death by the ambition of two federal prosecutors, US Attorney Carmen Ortiz and Assistant US Attorney Stephen Heymann, who had no aversion to destroying an innocent person with ridiculous and trumped-up charges in order to advance their careers.

It is rare for a prosecutor to suffer any consequence for bringing false charges, for consciously using and even paying for false evidence, and for lying to judge and jury.

As prosecutors are rarely held accountable, they employ illegal and unethical methods and routinely abuse their power. As judges are mainly concerned with clearing their court dockets, justice is rarely served in America, which explains why the US has not only a larger percentage of its citizens in prison than any other country on earth, but also the largest absolute number of prisoners. The US actually has more of its citizens in prison than “authoritarian” China which has a population four times larger than the US. The US, possibly the greatest human rights abuser in history, is constantly bringing human rights charges against China. Where are the human rights charges against Washington?

In America the collapse of law has gone beyond corrupt prosecutors and their concocted false prosecutions. Unless it needs or desires a show trial, a police state does not need prosecutors and courts. By producing legal memos that the president can both throw people into prison without a trial and execute them without a trial simply by stating that some official in the executive branch thinks the person has a possible or potential connection to terrorism, tyranny’s friends in the Justice (sic) Department have dispensed with the need for courts, prosecutors and trials.The Bush/Obama regime has made the executive branch judge, juror, and executioner. All that is needed is an unproven assertion by some executive branch official. Here we have the epitome of evil.

Evidence is no longer required for the president of the US to imprison people for life or to deprive them of their life. A secret Justice Department memo has been leaked to NBC News that reveals the tyrannical reasoning that authorizes the executive branch to execute American citizens on the basis of belief alone without the requirement of evidence that they are terrorists or associated with terrorists. See NBCreport
In “freedom and democracy” America, innocent until proven guilty is no longer the operative legal principle. If the government says you are guilty, you are. Period. No evidence required for your termination. Even Stalin pretended to have evidence.

The United States government is working its way step by step toward the determination that any and every critic of the government is guilty of providing “aid and comfort” to Washington’s “terrorist enemies,” which includes the elected Hamas government in Gaza. The only critics exempted from this rule-in-the-making are the neoconservatives who criticize the US government for being too slow to throttle both its critics and “anti-semites,” such as former US President Jimmy Carter, who criticize the Israeli government’s illegal appropriation of Palestinian lands. Most of Palestine has been stolen by Israel with Washington acquiesce and aid. Therefore, nothing is left for a “two-state solution.”

There is no doubt whatsoever that the Israeli government’s theft of Palestine is illegal; yet, Washington, on which Israel is totally dependent, does nothing about law. Law, we don’t need no stinking law.” Washington has might. Might is right. Get used to it.

Not only for Palestinians has law ceased to exist, but also for Americans, and for Washington’s NATO puppets in the UK and Europe, pitiful remnants of once great nations now complicit in Washington’s crimes against humanity. The Open Society Justice Initiative, a NGO based in New York, has issued a report that documents that 54 governments are involved in Washington’s rendition and torture program. Twenty-five of the governments that help Washington to kidnap, disappear, and torture people are European.

The opening decade of the 21st century has seen the destruction of all the law that was devised to protect the innocent and the vulnerable since the rise of the now defunct moral conscience of the West. The West’s moral conscience never applied outside of itself. What happened to people in Europe’s colonies and to native inhabitants of the US and Australia is a very different story.

Nevertheless, despite its lack of coverage to the powerless, the principle of the rule of law was a promising principle. Now America under Bush and Obama, two peas of the same pod, has abandoned the principle itself.
The Obama police state will be worse than the Bush/Cheney police state. Unlike conservatives who in times past were suspicious of government power, Obamabots believe that government power is a force for good if it is in the right hands. As Obama’s supporters see him as a member of an oppressed minority, they are confident that Obama will not misuse his power. This belief is akin to the belief that, as Jews suffered so much at the hands of Hitler, Israel would be fair to the Palestinians.

Glenn Greenwald writes that “the most extremist power any political leader can assert is the power to target his own citizens for execution without any charges or due process, far from any battlefield. The Obama administration has not only asserted exactly that power in theory, but has exercised it in practice.”

This is the power of a dictator. That Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi were said to have this power was part of their demonization as “brutal dictators,” a justification for overthrowing their governments and murdering the dictators and their supporters.

Ironic, isn’t it, that the president of the United States now murders his political opponents just as Saddam Hussein murdered his. How long before critics move from the no-fly list to the extermination list?

[link to www.theinnoplex.com]

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob