Welfare, food stamp recipients could soon be required to get microchipped with RFID tags

What's with you guys suddenly attacking the thread, lol.

The Bible IS true! It's all in there, everything we are seeing now. This chip will be required to either go in your right hand or your forehead (retinal eye scan?) according to Revelation 13:16.

One very important thing to remember...those who take the "chip"/"mark" CANNOT be saved (Revelation 14:11). This may not matter to the majority now but a day is coming when the Jesus says if your RIGHT eye or your RIGHT hand cause you to sin, it will be better to pluck out your eye or cut off your hand than to have your whole body cast into hell (Matthew 5:29-30). I believe it is talking about those who, either willingly or deceptively, take this mark.

Belief and relationship with Jesus Christ is our only protection from what is coming! If you find yourself at this "hour of temptation", keep God's Commandments (Exodus 20) and put your faith and Trust in Jesus Christ for this is the "patience of the (Tribulation) Saints" according to Revelation 14:12.

One last thing, should you wait until the Tribulation period begins to put your Faith and Trust in Jesus Christ and you refuse this chip/"mark", you will be beheaded according to Revelation 20:4 (obviously the Muslim religion of "peace" will reign during this time). As gruesome as it sounds, TAKE THE BEHEADING over the mark. Your death will be instantaneous and you will spend eternity in paradise! Take the mark/chip and an eternity of torment in hell awaits you. Your choice.

Peace.

JP Morgan shills

It doesn't surprise me at all that those dependent on the government for meeting basic needs would be targeted first. When faced with hunger I'd imagine people are quite agreeable. I know that plenty of gov't assistance recipients are just lazy (at best), but I've known good people who needed assistance at one time or another.

Personally, if I needed help with my grocery bill, I'd starve before accepting any kind of biometric ID anything. Meaning, I'd figure SOMETHING else out. And that suggests that if this tech were to be put in place, it could potentially weed out the lazy, unmotivated leechers from the rest.

If this does ever get implemented, I'd suggest to anyone on assistance who does not wish to submit to it, to suddenly "acquire a job" that pays 60k+ so you can get totally off of their radar. It's probably just me being paranoid, but if this does happen, I'd imagine you may have difficulty removing yourself from their programs otherwise.

Monthly drug testing should be the first thing implemented for food stamp/housing/cash assistance recipients. One failed test you're cut off for good. It would cut the roles down by huge numbers in some areas of this country. It would weed out those who truly need the assistance and who are abusing it.

FUCK YOU.....welfare is a sin in my book but that doesn't give me any right to take some loosers blood just to see if they are living up to my own standards....to each his own....give it or not...no strings

Drug tests are easy to beat.


It would never work.

Monthly drug testing should be the first thing implemented for food stamp/housing/cash assistance recipients. One failed test you're cut off for good. It would cut the roles down by huge numbers in some areas of this country. It would weed out those who truly need the assistance and who are abusing it.

Something missing here is the food stamp program is the first step of the cashless society.

Actually an embedded chip could be used to test on a real time basis. If the chip detects prohibited drugs, the next time the recipient goes to the store ......no benefit.

Like fish in a barrel, they are already hooked. All the "beast" has to do is reel them in!
+=

Absolutely. Do not reward the druggies.

FUCK YOU.....welfare is a sin in my book but that doesn't give me any right to take some loosers blood just to see if they are living up to my own standards....to each his own....give it or not...no strings

A bit wee defensive there. First off NO BLOOD involved. You piss in a cup.

You missed my point. Some people really are not able to take care of themselves and need help from others now and then. There will always be those who need assistance. Others abuse the system and are bleeding it dry.

A lot of people in my area on assistance use drugs. I have seen street kids spend $80 EBT on a small bag of food at the high end grocery near where I live, then see those same kids on the street smoking a joint. If you can afford to buy the drugs you consume then you surely can afford the food you consume.

There absolutely have to be strings if you if yo uare going to get something for free. NOthing is for free. I also believe that those on welfare should be required to volunteer a certain number of hours a month. Nothing is for free.

Good! about damn time. Mark those worthless f*cks

Actually an embedded chip could be used to test on a real time basis. If the chip detects prohibited drugs, the next time the recipient goes to the store ......no benefit.

Let the dependent slave class be marked as such. Chipped and drug tested: if I am spending my money on them, I want to know what I'm getting for it and who is getting it.

I'm paying for it. No way I'd let my slaves run around and not track them or know what they're buying.

What is even more appalling to me is to read fellow Americans support ANY program that requires marking of citizens simply because they fall within arbitrary guidelines of what some have deemed as "Undesirable".

Have you not the foresight to see - especially with the current Administration - that it is but a stroke of the pen and you will also fall as categorized "Undesirable"?

Disagree with the government in general?
Disagree with Obama specifically?
Disagree with DHS?
Support/ believe/ recite the Constitution?
Still clinging to your guns?
Christian?

How dense must one be to support any such policy? Are we that divided, that hate-filled, that self-promoting that we have blinded ourselves from recognizing the very shackles of the future, but have accepted and even promoted such - as long as it applies to "Undesirables" - with neither thought nor concern for WHO is determining the very definition of the word?

Good! about damn time. Mark those worthless f*cks