Gun Owners Can Be Sued For Using Them?

There have been many successful lawsuits by criminals who were shot in the act of breaking & entering, burglarizing, attempted rape, home invasion, etc.

It's absolutely insane, and any judge who allows such a case to even be heard should be taken out back and executed immediately.

The only thing you can do is, if someone breaks into your home and you have to shoot them, do not stop shooting until they're dead. Otherwise, they'll take you to court and probably win your house, your car, and your retirement.

All they are doing is making it too expensive for your average gun owner to own a firearm. If you do not have proof of insurance for your car guess what? You lose your tag in the spot and your vehicle can not be moved until you have proper documents showing proof of insurance. If you are caught carrying a firearm without insurance you will probably have your firearm taken until your buy the proper insurance. They know they can not violate the Constituion so they will just by pass it by other means.

They're trying to push a liability insurance requirement in order to effectively enact a backdoor ban by making gun ownership too expensive for the average person. It wouldn't surprise me if it passes in the libtard cesspool states. Granted, it would seem unconstitutional, but after the idiot logic that led to the insurance requirement in Obamacare being upheld, I wouldn't expect the Supreme Court to reject this insurance requirement, either.

Yeah I have actually been told by police officers that a dead man can tell no tales and there is only one side of the story. If you shoot, shoot to kill.

Seriously? I hope you enjoying losing your guns people!

Dead men file no suits.

So it seems the alternative is to finish them off in the house.

Center mass people. Center mass

We were told in our CCW class a bullet will cost you $50,000. They said if you shoot someone in your own home and they live, plan on spending at least $50,000 on lawyer fees defending yourself. Disgusting.