Is gravity faster than light? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32536602 Canada 02/05/2013 10:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Dark Stranger User ID: 3003754 United States 02/05/2013 10:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 9.8 M/S is the speed of gravity, on this celestial body light is like... way faster. I"vE got a question for ya, If all the cows stopped farting would we solve global warming? or, lemme put it like this: what if all the water on earth froze, would the fish learn how to ice-skate? |
chowan User ID: 33777772 United States 02/05/2013 10:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | 9.8 M/S is the speed of gravity, on this celestial body Quoting: Dark Stranger 3003754 light is like... way faster. I"vE got a question for ya, If all the cows stopped farting would we solve global warming? or, lemme put it like this: what if all the water on earth froze, would the fish learn how to ice-skate? 9.8 m/s is not the speed of gravity dummy 9.8 m/s/s is the acceleration due to gravity OP asks or poses a very interesting question sheell be right mate |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 904314 Canada 02/05/2013 10:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I read a novel recently, called Metaplanetary by Tony Daniel, which turned out to be a pretty excellent and somewhat astounding sci fi. In this novel, it is postulated that the reason he have not found the "particle" responsible for the force of gravity is because it travels in the 4th dimension.. that is to say, time, and that the 'gravity' effect is due to matter being slightly pulled while that happens. This actually makes a certain amount of sense, and I wouldn't be surprised if we one day learned that gravity indeed did emanate from something traveling in ways we are not equipped to perceive, either in time, or even one of those other possible dimensions theorized to exist. (* note: dimension does not mean "some other place", just a direction, other than up/down, left/right, back/forth, and forward-in-time/backward-in-time ) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 904314 Canada 02/05/2013 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Err forgot to add that this means that although it is not "faster than light", since it would be traveling through some other directional dimension, it might appear to travel faster than light to our 4 dimension based senses! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33455081 United States 02/05/2013 10:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Have the scientists figured it out yet or?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31910747 If the sun just disappeared right now, it would take 8 minutes or so for the light to stop coming... But IMO planets would STOP ``moving around the Sun`` immediately... What do you think? Now that you mention the planets movement, it's not just light and temperature that would change when the sun goes, wouldn't we be dealing with massive tsunamis and earthquakes from the sudden stop of movement? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32604708 Mexico 02/05/2013 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If gravity only worked at lightspeed, the Earth would fly out of its orbit since we are 8 light minutes away from the Sun. The action at a distance part is what proves the "scientists" don't have a clue as to what gravity really is. Their THEORIES merely explain what gravity DOES, not how or why it does it. Observations do not agree with their theories, hence the continual invention of fantasies like black holes and magic fairy dust called dark matter. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 904314 Canada 02/05/2013 10:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If the sun were to suddenly vanish, perhaps the effects would be immediately noticeable in that spacetime would cease to be bent in that location and would "spring" back into place, maybe causing all sorts of ripply behaviors.. After all, the entire universe apparently sprang into being at speeds immeasurably faster than light-speed! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 904314 Canada 02/05/2013 10:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The action at a distance part is what proves the "scientists" don't have a clue as to what gravity really is. Their THEORIES merely explain what gravity DOES, not how or why it does it. Observations do not agree with their theories, hence the continual invention of fantasies like black holes and magic fairy dust called dark matter. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32604708 Blackholes are not theoretical, we observe them in action pretty often these days! Dark matter is not theoretical, they have even mapped out the local structure of dark matter. Dark energy IS theoretical, on the other hand, postulated as an explanation as to why the universe hasn't collapsed under it's own gravity by now heh And.. gravity is known to be unknown, no surprise there. It's the one 'natural' force we haven't figured out yet. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1750328 United States 02/05/2013 10:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
vivaldi User ID: 5140030 United Kingdom 02/05/2013 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hard to say, as there is no consensus on which quantum gravity model is the correct one. I believe Gravity is an emergent effect, caused by the discrete packets of our spatial fabric expanding at different rates. This would involve dense parts expanding slower than others. (giving the impression that space on the whole is expanding, but with less dense regions being pushed towards the denser regions) This is similar to how atmospheric wind is an emergent effect caused by air pressure differentials, which in turn is just the average velocity of individual air molecules. An Isobar on a weather map shows a region of equal air pressure, but it is meaningless in the context of an individual air molecule. Similarly, I believe that an equipotential in a gravitational field is meaningless in the context of an individual expanding packet of space. If this model is correct, then the 'speed' of gravity would be determined by the rate at which individual packets of space can expand against their neighbors. This would of course be the speed of light. My 2 cents anyway. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 904314 Canada 02/05/2013 11:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why are we looking for answers in thing's way far away when we have more major problems right here in front of us? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1750328 By examining the universe at large, they can make theories and predictions that can aide them in inventing new and useful technologies for us ground pounders. A direct example of this: the Transistors in most of our electronics. How did they come up with quantum mechanics? Ultimately, by observing the universe! |
IO User ID: 31937798 United States 02/05/2013 11:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 25716930 United States 02/05/2013 11:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | speed of light = 186,000 miles per second. Now that's pretty fast. But, they theorize that not even light can escape the gravitational pull of a black hole so... So if light cannot escape a massive force of gravity, then gravity wins??? Regardless, the speed of thought trumps both. While traveling in your astral body, just the thought of a location, no matter how far away and BAM!! you're there, instantly. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29311787 Canada 02/05/2013 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Have the scientists figured it out yet or?? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31910747 If the sun just disappeared right now, it would take 8 minutes or so for the light to stop coming... But IMO planets would STOP ``moving around the Sun`` immediately... What do you think? I don't know. But great thread and question OP, and good food for thought in the responses too. I read a novel recently, called Metaplanetary by Tony Daniel, which turned out to be a pretty excellent and somewhat astounding sci fi. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 904314 In this novel, it is postulated that the reason he have not found the "particle" responsible for the force of gravity is because it travels in the 4th dimension.. that is to say, time, and that the 'gravity' effect is due to matter being slightly pulled while that happens. This actually makes a certain amount of sense, and I wouldn't be surprised if we one day learned that gravity indeed did emanate from something traveling in ways we are not equipped to perceive, either in time, or even one of those other possible dimensions theorized to exist. (* note: dimension does not mean "some other place", just a direction, other than up/down, left/right, back/forth, and forward-in-time/backward-in-time ) Thanks for the reference! This has me very curious.. "Does gravity act instantly or at c?" [link to www.sciforums.com] |
IO User ID: 31937798 United States 02/05/2013 11:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The standards and measurements earth scientists use are GEOCENTRIC, based on earths orbital relation to sol. Try defining speed of light, gravity or anything without using seconds, minutes, etc. What is a second on Mars. True science is based on more elemental standards of time. Understanding interstellar technology requires this evolution |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 29311787 Canada 02/05/2013 11:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | "The most amazing thing I was taught as a graduate student of celestial mechanics at Yale in the 1960s was that all gravitational interactions between bodies in all dynamical systems had to be taken as instantaneous. This seemed unacceptable on two counts. In the first place, it seemed to be a form of “action at a distance”. Perhaps no one has so elegantly expressed the objection to such a concept better than Sir Isaac Newton: “That one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of any thing else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to the other, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it.” (See Hoffman, 1983.) But mediation requires propagation, and finite bodies should be incapable of propagation at infinite speeds since that would require infinite energy. So instantaneous gravity seemed to have an element of magic to it..." [link to www.metaresearch.org] ..a very good question indeed.. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24904482 Canada 02/05/2013 11:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
vivaldi User ID: 5140030 United Kingdom 02/08/2013 07:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hard to say, as there is no consensus on which quantum gravity model is the correct one. Quoting: vivaldi 5140030 I believe Gravity is an emergent effect, caused by the discrete packets of our spatial fabric expanding at different rates. This would involve dense parts expanding slower than others. (giving the impression that space on the whole is expanding, but with less dense regions being pushed towards the denser regions) This is similar to how atmospheric wind is an emergent effect caused by air pressure differentials, which in turn is just the average velocity of individual air molecules. An Isobar on a weather map shows a region of equal air pressure, but it is meaningless in the context of an individual air molecule. Similarly, I believe that an equipotential in a gravitational field is meaningless in the context of an individual expanding packet of space. If this model is correct, then the 'speed' of gravity would be determined by the rate at which individual packets of space can expand against their neighbors. This would of course be the speed of light. My 2 cents anyway. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5140030 United Kingdom 02/08/2013 07:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Jump off a building with a laser in your hand and see what hits the ground first. Quoting: Open Your Eyes He isn't talking acceleration due to gravity. He means the time it takes for gravitational forces from one object to start affecting another. Eg, Would planets stop orbiting a star instantaneously if the star were to suddenly vanish? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24410859 United States 02/08/2013 07:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | speed of light = 186,000 miles per second. Now that's pretty fast. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25716930 But, they theorize that not even light can escape the gravitational pull of a black hole so... So if light cannot escape a massive force of gravity, then gravity wins??? Regardless, the speed of thought trumps both. While traveling in your astral body, just the thought of a location, no matter how far away and BAM!! you're there, instantly. I've often wondered that very thing! I used to wonder if maybe black holes were one of the brightest objects we could see, plausibly, but can not due to light not being able to escape gravity...which made me wonder if gravity can somehow trap the light, wouldn't it be able to outrun it, somehow? I don't know enough hard science to do any calculations, and I probably ignored some major enormous law, but, oh well. Great thread! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1366745 United Kingdom 02/08/2013 07:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good question. Which way does gravity travel? it might be saying, its pushing the light or sucking it into a wormhole like you are led to believe but even then you may have to account for a force that isnt even directly travelling in the light or involved how you may think. This might make you laugh and its for jokes but what if our mouth and ass has a different purpose. Its all there because we need it to be living here but have you ever thought, can pure light travel through your throat and out your ass like an event horizon lol. What if the light, we do truly hold inside and the saying do you think the sun shines out your ass has its origin. We are wormholes meeting and co existing. This could mean does gravity or the universe hold your inner being too. Its simple. I dont think we have our individual universes but I guess if we ever do meet again we should all be less selfish from the beginning. Spread the love. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23531624 Netherlands 02/08/2013 07:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1298522 United States 02/08/2013 07:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1298522 United States 02/08/2013 07:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33508203 United Kingdom 02/08/2013 08:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33973985 Canada 02/08/2013 08:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
WISE GUY User ID: 29741506 United States 02/08/2013 08:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | speed of light = 186,000 miles per second. Now that's pretty fast. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 25716930 But, they theorize that not even light can escape the gravitational pull of a black hole so... So if light cannot escape a massive force of gravity, then gravity wins??? Regardless, the speed of thought trumps both. While traveling in your astral body, just the thought of a location, no matter how far away and BAM!! you're there, instantly. I've often wondered that very thing! I used to wonder if maybe black holes were one of the brightest objects we could see, plausibly, but can not due to light not being able to escape gravity...which made me wonder if gravity can somehow trap the light, wouldn't it be able to outrun it, somehow? I don't know enough hard science to do any calculations, and I probably ignored some major enormous law, but, oh well. Great thread! You are correct, gravitational pull must be faster. If light can not escape it. JAA |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 16727637 United Kingdom 02/08/2013 08:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1395091 Australia 02/08/2013 08:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |