Fukushima current status report | |
| EMPerror User ID: 15172261 02/06/2013 05:44 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is something like resonance neutron absorption. Once neutrons are slowed down or fall into resonance energy, there is a chance of criticality. [link to nuclearpowertraining.tpub.com] If material is diluted enough by dissolved impurities, it wont cause chain reaction (and no problem). Otherwise there is danger. It didn't explode throughout all this time? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16766028 02/06/2013 05:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16766028 It's all a load of old crap. There is no melting core. Start using some clear thoughts and think about fissioning. You are told that fissioning happens when fuel rods are placed side by side full of fuel pellets in a coated zirconium tube. The neutrons jump from on rod to another smashing into atoms and control rods are lowered between them to stop the fissioning. I've gave you the very basic of what we are told to believe, so now have a think about a meltdown. Once something like that melted down, the fissioning process would cease to exist, if it were real in the first place, which it isn't. Even TEPCO admits the reality that at least two cores have experienced full meltdown. You must be remarkably ignorant of the topic. And now you're here claiming that the entire nuclear industry is a free energy front? You are a fucking retard, you are derailing an otherwise informative thread, and nobody gives a shit about your half-baked evidence-free ignorant pseudoscience. If you want to examine such a ridiculously far-flung idea, make your own fucking thread, and show up with some fucking proof and evidence next time ya twat. Nobody wants to hear your fanciful unsupported bullshit. 1.) I only base my opinions on facts. You present no evidence or facts. Therefore I would be a fool to believe you, and you are a fool expecting educated people to take you seriously without it. 2.) I'm not worrying myself to death, thank you very much. I'm pursuing an interest. I also intend to be the first to know when there is an immediate cause for worry. That is the whole point of discussing conspiracies and alt news. If that doesn't appeal to you, then why the fuck are you here? 3.) The burden of proof regarding your own crackpot theories is entirely on your shoulders, not mine. Got evidence? Well put up or shut up. The real conspiracy is that nuclear power doesn't exist as we are told and explosions are not nuclear of any kind, just hydrogen explosions or something like that. You are only studying what they want you to study and all your study is based entirely on the theory of it all working. You will never see fissioning in progress but you might see something light up and glow like a fishing rod luminous effect tip light in larger form. That's about it. Believing that chunks of extremely dense, yet somehow harder than titanium can somehow fission and heat water for years on end, is physics fantasy book stuff. It's fiction and if you got a certificate for remembering that fiction, then good on you, but all your certificate means, is, you have a good memory for recalling what you were "told" ..."tutored." |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33314783 02/06/2013 05:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It has been suggested the curium exited the number 3 unit in 3 seconds. It's decent into the Earth is at a rate of .358 of a mile per day. This would equate to a depth of 250 miles in 99 weeks. Quoting: burpinflyz This is fact based on current knowledge of Corium, you can't shrill this. My humble request in posting, is for clarity in decifering all the intel into a probability of occurrence. Nothing more nothing less. If you have the answers please share with me so I can rest. They not going tell you this as it was kept secret after a being on tv broadcast the 1986 Chernobyl disaster (Ukrainian}burnt down as well and it now is only a 100 miles from earths core what happens then heats up core volcanos go off EQ start you get the picture now |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33760964 02/06/2013 05:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The conspiracy is within the conspiracy, it's just got many people thinking along the lines of the wrong one and believing nuclear power exists and it's so dangerous. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16766028 The real conspiracy is that nuclear power doesn't exist as we are told and explosions are not nuclear of any kind, just hydrogen explosions or something like that. You are only studying what they want you to study and all your study is based entirely on the theory of it all working. You will never see fissioning in progress but you might see something light up and glow like a fishing rod luminous effect tip light in larger form. That's about it. Believing that chunks of extremely dense, yet somehow harder than titanium can somehow fission and heat water for years on end, is physics fantasy book stuff. It's fiction and if you got a certificate for remembering that fiction, then good on you, but all your certificate means, is, you have a good memory for recalling what you were "told" ..."tutored." You fucking idiot. What happened at Chernobyl? What did they detonate over Hiroshima and Nagasaki? What did they blow up Bikini Atoll with? Why is radiation, and its negative effects on health, apparent in every industry that uses it? How do you explain chemo? HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?! How come you can't explain your own fucking theory? "Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? You are utterly uneducated. You can spit ion receiving education from others all you like, but that's much better than pulling unfounded ideas straight from my ass, like you have done. Your galloping assumptions lead nowhere and are based on nothing. Less than worthless. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16766028 02/06/2013 05:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It has been suggested the curium exited the number 3 unit in 3 seconds. It's decent into the Earth is at a rate of .358 of a mile per day. This would equate to a depth of 250 miles in 99 weeks. Quoting: burpinflyz This is fact based on current knowledge of Corium, you can't shrill this. My humble request in posting, is for clarity in decifering all the intel into a probability of occurrence. Nothing more nothing less. If you have the answers please share with me so I can rest. They not going tell you this as it was kept secret after a being on tv broadcast the 1986 Chernobyl disaster (Ukrainian}burnt down as well and it now is only a 100 miles from earths core what happens then heats up core volcanos go off EQ start you get the picture now Let's say it's all real, (which it isn't) and it did melt. By the time that started melting into the Earth's crust and going down, it would be thinned to nothing, so no critical mass anymore, yet tell me how molten metal can still fission? It's all a load of old baloney man. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33794479 02/06/2013 06:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The conspiracy is within the conspiracy, it's just got many people thinking along the lines of the wrong one and believing nuclear power exists and it's so dangerous. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16766028 The real conspiracy is that nuclear power doesn't exist as we are told and explosions are not nuclear of any kind, just hydrogen explosions or something like that. You are only studying what they want you to study and all your study is based entirely on the theory of it all working. You will never see fissioning in progress but you might see something light up and glow like a fishing rod luminous effect tip light in larger form. That's about it. Believing that chunks of extremely dense, yet somehow harder than titanium can somehow fission and heat water for years on end, is physics fantasy book stuff. It's fiction and if you got a certificate for remembering that fiction, then good on you, but all your certificate means, is, you have a good memory for recalling what you were "told" ..."tutored." You fucking idiot. What happened at Chernobyl? What did they detonate over Hiroshima and Nagasaki? What did they blow up Bikini Atoll with? Why is radiation, and its negative effects on health, apparent in every industry that uses it? How do you explain chemo? HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?! How come you can't explain your own fucking theory? "Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? You are utterly uneducated. You can spit ion receiving education from others all you like, but that's much better than pulling unfounded ideas straight from my ass, like you have done. Your galloping assumptions lead nowhere and are based on nothing. Less than worthless. Just ignore him, I often muse that people like him are planted within conspiracy communities purely to discredit them. It's a shame that such an uneducated fantasist has that flag on his profile. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33794479 02/06/2013 06:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It has been suggested the curium exited the number 3 unit in 3 seconds. It's decent into the Earth is at a rate of .358 of a mile per day. This would equate to a depth of 250 miles in 99 weeks. Quoting: burpinflyz This is fact based on current knowledge of Corium, you can't shrill this. My humble request in posting, is for clarity in decifering all the intel into a probability of occurrence. Nothing more nothing less. If you have the answers please share with me so I can rest. They not going tell you this as it was kept secret after a being on tv broadcast the 1986 Chernobyl disaster (Ukrainian}burnt down as well and it now is only a 100 miles from earths core what happens then heats up core volcanos go off EQ start you get the picture now Let's say it's all real, (which it isn't) and it did melt. By the time that started melting into the Earth's crust and going down, it would be thinned to nothing, so no critical mass anymore, yet tell me how molten metal can still fission? It's all a load of old baloney man. You're just embarrassing yourself and the UK spouting this. ...........By the time that started melting into the Earth's crust and going down, it would be thinned to nothing,..... Thinned down? With what? ...........yet tell me how molten metal can still fission?...... So you believe that nuclear fission is an action and process only attributable to solidified metal? |
| Citizenperth User ID: 33499077 02/06/2013 06:07 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Came across 8 gig worth of Fukushima intel...have a peek at this. If anyone can debunk, soften, or explain to me what a probable outcome might be when the nuclear core reaches 205 meters, please post. Also, for those who are trained in the science, what might happen when this nuclear blob hits the core of the Earth? Quoting: burpinflyz [link to www.4shared.com] There is more info posted here, at 4 shared, if you dare open as this glimpse equates to choosing the blue or red pill. Something's are better not known, but as free men/women the choice should be left to each and every individual. I hope and pray I have connected the dots wrong, and would rest easier if someone tells me just that. But as I cannot dicier all science behind this, I feel it necessary to share the link, and will suffer my fate...GLPers God Speed. It's all a load of old crap. There is no melting core. Start using some clear thoughts and think about fissioning. You are told that fissioning happens when fuel rods are placed side by side full of fuel pellets in a coated zirconium tube. The neutrons jump from on rod to another smashing into atoms and control rods are lowered between them to stop the fissioning. I've gave you the very basic of what we are told to believe, so now have a think about a meltdown. Once something like that melted down, the fissioning process would cease to exist, if it were real in the first place, which it isn't. Even TEPCO admits the reality that at least two cores have experienced full meltdown. You must be remarkably ignorant of the topic. And now you're here claiming that the entire nuclear industry is a free energy front? You are a fucking retard, you are derailing an otherwise informative thread, and nobody gives a shit about your half-baked evidence-free ignorant pseudoscience. If you want to examine such a ridiculously far-flung idea, make your own fucking thread, and show up with some fucking proof and evidence next time ya twat. Nobody wants to hear your fanciful unsupported bullshit. I really don't think it matters us, just like the 50's atomic testing and atmospheric explosions, which i also think colludes against your argument... it is the children's children of tomorrow... It's life as we know it, but only just. My Blog: [link to fukushimaemergencywhatcanwedo.blogspot.com] I have my own personal Japanese Shill(s) TEPCO for posting the truth about Fukushima, do you? If you are abused by ACs on my threads particularly anything that may end in an 'atom', DO NOT RESPOND to them. Their posts will be deleted and they will be banned. Atom-Tepco-Please-Don't! *** not anti-islam *** just anti-idiots... any religion... sic ut vos es vos should exsisto , denego alius vicis facio vos change , exsisto youself , proprie today's pic is of my puppies debating doom cause they talk;) twitter: @citizenperth |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16766028 02/06/2013 06:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The conspiracy is within the conspiracy, it's just got many people thinking along the lines of the wrong one and believing nuclear power exists and it's so dangerous. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16766028 The real conspiracy is that nuclear power doesn't exist as we are told and explosions are not nuclear of any kind, just hydrogen explosions or something like that. You are only studying what they want you to study and all your study is based entirely on the theory of it all working. You will never see fissioning in progress but you might see something light up and glow like a fishing rod luminous effect tip light in larger form. That's about it. Believing that chunks of extremely dense, yet somehow harder than titanium can somehow fission and heat water for years on end, is physics fantasy book stuff. It's fiction and if you got a certificate for remembering that fiction, then good on you, but all your certificate means, is, you have a good memory for recalling what you were "told" ..."tutored." You fucking idiot. What happened at Chernobyl?..Hydrogen explosion or similar. It didn't stop them working at the other supposed reactors did it. What did they detonate over Hiroshima and Nagasaki?Fuel/air bomb (nepalm or similar) What did they blow up Bikini Atoll with?Large conventional explosives. Why is radiation, and its negative effects on health, apparent in every industry that uses it? ..Because radiation is real but nuclear radiation isn't. How do you explain chemo?...It's a form of radiation that's all. People think of radiation as all harmful, yet the sun radiates heat and so does your fire, radiator, oven and even yourself. It's all radiation, it just happens that people think of radiation as Nuclear and it scares them, yet most is harmless and some are harmful, such as chemo and radiology...and so on. HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?!Not by Nuclear radiation emitting Uranium. How come you can't explain your own fucking theory?How can I explain something that does not exist? "Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? It means what it says. Those plants are run on Hydrogen or methane or something like that and maybe lots more to it as well, except fissioning Uranium. You are utterly uneducated. You can spit ion receiving education from others all you like, but that's much better than pulling unfounded ideas straight from my ass, like you have done.What you think of me is irrelevant. Your galloping assumptions lead nowhere and are based on nothing. Less than worthless.Your gallant assumptions are based on being spoon fed a complete load of lies and you eagerly gobbled them up and refuse to even think that it has a sour taste to it. There you go , I think I've answered your questions above. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33314783 02/06/2013 06:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It has been suggested the curium exited the number 3 unit in 3 seconds. It's decent into the Earth is at a rate of .358 of a mile per day. This would equate to a depth of 250 miles in 99 weeks. Quoting: burpinflyz This is fact based on current knowledge of Corium, you can't shrill this. My humble request in posting, is for clarity in decifering all the intel into a probability of occurrence. Nothing more nothing less. If you have the answers please share with me so I can rest. They not going tell you this as it was kept secret after a being on tv broadcast the 1986 Chernobyl disaster (Ukrainian}burnt down as well and it now is only a 100 miles from earths core what happens then heats up core volcanos go off EQ start you get the picture now Let's say it's all real, (which it isn't) and it did melt. By the time that started melting into the Earth's crust and going down, it would be thinned to nothing, so no critical mass anymore, yet tell me how molten metal can still fission? It's all a load of old baloney man. Now you are talking a lot of crap,first the 1986 burn down will keep burning mass burning for around 1 thousand years inside core is nuke hot outside look of glass at time of the 1986 uk world help wanted to dig under core and put a concret base to hold core it did not happen nothing could hold that core its as hot as a sun. Baloney man,ITS NOT they thought 25/30 years before it hits earths core 27 years have pasted. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 21385761 02/06/2013 06:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33473565 02/06/2013 06:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, i looked into Pattie Brassard and his Files and remember him from the first Days after o3/11, as far as i can see it it is (still) only Bs.! We don:t know everything but we know what is not happening and i don:t believe in a huge Conspiracy with countless of People who lie since nearly 2 Years! There is a full Melt-Down in Nr. 1 with the molten Fuel on the Mat and Nr.2 and Nr. 3 partial. Some People here claimed that Tepco left this Plant alone and done nothing in the days after but this is not the Fact. please compare and Research the Timeline! Also there was a bit of Cooling, Valves, there was Water and there was a lot of luck (or help by God, Gods, Aliens, Handkerchiefs) be thankful for that! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33473565 02/06/2013 06:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16766028 02/06/2013 06:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It has been suggested the curium exited the number 3 unit in 3 seconds. It's decent into the Earth is at a rate of .358 of a mile per day. This would equate to a depth of 250 miles in 99 weeks. Quoting: burpinflyz This is fact based on current knowledge of Corium, you can't shrill this. My humble request in posting, is for clarity in decifering all the intel into a probability of occurrence. Nothing more nothing less. If you have the answers please share with me so I can rest. They not going tell you this as it was kept secret after a being on tv broadcast the 1986 Chernobyl disaster (Ukrainian}burnt down as well and it now is only a 100 miles from earths core what happens then heats up core volcanos go off EQ start you get the picture now Let's say it's all real, (which it isn't) and it did melt. By the time that started melting into the Earth's crust and going down, it would be thinned to nothing, so no critical mass anymore, yet tell me how molten metal can still fission? It's all a load of old baloney man. Now you are talking a lot of crap,first the 1986 burn down will keep burning mass burning for around 1 thousand years inside core is nuke hot outside look of glass at time of the 1986 uk world help wanted to dig under core and put a concret base to hold core it did not happen nothing could hold that core its as hot as a sun. Baloney man,ITS NOT they thought 25/30 years before it hits earths core 27 years have pasted. I'm happy enough if people want to believe all that tripe. I can't change anyones mind, it's up to them to change their own or stick with what they get told. To get any understanding of what I'm saying, you need to clear your mind and forget the books for now, plus forget the supposed whistle blowers who tell you how dangerous this stuff is, like Helen Caldicott and Leuren Moret. These people might really believe they are whistle blowers, yet I doubt it but they do an excellent job of making the public aware of how dangerous Nuclear fall out is. There are probably 6 or so stand out so called experts peddling the dangers and the two females are up there. To understand it all, you have to really think right outside the box on this matter, as it's a clever brain scrambling tactic to have everyone not knowing if they're batting or bowling or fielding. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33473565 02/06/2013 06:27 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And here is the only valid and the actual "Status-Report"; [link to www.tepco.co.jp] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33794479 02/06/2013 06:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The conspiracy is within the conspiracy, it's just got many people thinking along the lines of the wrong one and believing nuclear power exists and it's so dangerous. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16766028 The real conspiracy is that nuclear power doesn't exist as we are told and explosions are not nuclear of any kind, just hydrogen explosions or something like that. You are only studying what they want you to study and all your study is based entirely on the theory of it all working. You will never see fissioning in progress but you might see something light up and glow like a fishing rod luminous effect tip light in larger form. That's about it. Believing that chunks of extremely dense, yet somehow harder than titanium can somehow fission and heat water for years on end, is physics fantasy book stuff. It's fiction and if you got a certificate for remembering that fiction, then good on you, but all your certificate means, is, you have a good memory for recalling what you were "told" ..."tutored." You fucking idiot. What happened at Chernobyl?..Hydrogen explosion or similar. It didn't stop them working at the other supposed reactors did it. What did they detonate over Hiroshima and Nagasaki?Fuel/air bomb (nepalm or similar) What did they blow up Bikini Atoll with?Large conventional explosives. Why is radiation, and its negative effects on health, apparent in every industry that uses it? ..Because radiation is real but nuclear radiation isn't. How do you explain chemo?...It's a form of radiation that's all. People think of radiation as all harmful, yet the sun radiates heat and so does your fire, radiator, oven and even yourself. It's all radiation, it just happens that people think of radiation as Nuclear and it scares them, yet most is harmless and some are harmful, such as chemo and radiology...and so on. HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?!Not by Nuclear radiation emitting Uranium. How come you can't explain your own fucking theory?How can I explain something that does not exist? "Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? It means what it says. Those plants are run on Hydrogen or methane or something like that and maybe lots more to it as well, except fissioning Uranium. You are utterly uneducated. You can spit ion receiving education from others all you like, but that's much better than pulling unfounded ideas straight from my ass, like you have done.What you think of me is irrelevant. Your galloping assumptions lead nowhere and are based on nothing. Less than worthless.Your gallant assumptions are based on being spoon fed a complete load of lies and you eagerly gobbled them up and refuse to even think that it has a sour taste to it. There you go , I think I've answered your questions above. ................."HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?!Not by Nuclear radiation emitting Uranium."............. It DOES work by radioactive emission, but not using Uranium. Uranium is a mineral, not energy on the electromagnetic spectrum or a particle. ......................."Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? It means what it says. Those plants are run on Hydrogen or methane or something like that and maybe lots more to it as well, except fissioning Uranium.".......... Wrong, completely. ................."How do you explain chemo?...It's a form of radiation that's all. People think of radiation as all harmful, yet the sun radiates heat and so does your fire, radiator, oven and even yourself. It's all radiation, it just happens that people think of radiation as Nuclear and it scares them, yet most is harmless and some are harmful, such as chemo and radiology...and so on."................ Radiation is a means to describe emissions, ie ; Radiation = To Radiate. When one speaks of emissions on the electromagnetic scale, they are assuming you comprehend the basis electromagnetic wavelength and scaling, ie : γ Gamma Radiation. When one is talking about physical radiation, they are assuming you comprehend the concept that particles are emitted, ie α Alpha & β Beta Particles. There are no pure Gamma emissions, Gamma emissions are accompanied by Alpha and Beta emissions. ..........."There you go , I think I've answered your questions above......... You answered nothing apart from highlighting your own ignorance and stupidity. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16766028 02/06/2013 06:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The conspiracy is within the conspiracy, it's just got many people thinking along the lines of the wrong one and believing nuclear power exists and it's so dangerous. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16766028 The real conspiracy is that nuclear power doesn't exist as we are told and explosions are not nuclear of any kind, just hydrogen explosions or something like that. You are only studying what they want you to study and all your study is based entirely on the theory of it all working. You will never see fissioning in progress but you might see something light up and glow like a fishing rod luminous effect tip light in larger form. That's about it. Believing that chunks of extremely dense, yet somehow harder than titanium can somehow fission and heat water for years on end, is physics fantasy book stuff. It's fiction and if you got a certificate for remembering that fiction, then good on you, but all your certificate means, is, you have a good memory for recalling what you were "told" ..."tutored." You fucking idiot. What happened at Chernobyl?..Hydrogen explosion or similar. It didn't stop them working at the other supposed reactors did it. What did they detonate over Hiroshima and Nagasaki?Fuel/air bomb (nepalm or similar) What did they blow up Bikini Atoll with?Large conventional explosives. Why is radiation, and its negative effects on health, apparent in every industry that uses it? ..Because radiation is real but nuclear radiation isn't. How do you explain chemo?...It's a form of radiation that's all. People think of radiation as all harmful, yet the sun radiates heat and so does your fire, radiator, oven and even yourself. It's all radiation, it just happens that people think of radiation as Nuclear and it scares them, yet most is harmless and some are harmful, such as chemo and radiology...and so on. HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?!Not by Nuclear radiation emitting Uranium. How come you can't explain your own fucking theory?How can I explain something that does not exist? "Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? It means what it says. Those plants are run on Hydrogen or methane or something like that and maybe lots more to it as well, except fissioning Uranium. You are utterly uneducated. You can spit ion receiving education from others all you like, but that's much better than pulling unfounded ideas straight from my ass, like you have done.What you think of me is irrelevant. Your galloping assumptions lead nowhere and are based on nothing. Less than worthless.Your gallant assumptions are based on being spoon fed a complete load of lies and you eagerly gobbled them up and refuse to even think that it has a sour taste to it. There you go , I think I've answered your questions above. ................."HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?!Not by Nuclear radiation emitting Uranium."............. It DOES work by radioactive emission, but not using Uranium. Uranium is a mineral, not energy on the electromagnetic spectrum or a particle. ......................."Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? It means what it says. Those plants are run on Hydrogen or methane or something like that and maybe lots more to it as well, except fissioning Uranium.".......... Wrong, completely. ................."How do you explain chemo?...It's a form of radiation that's all. People think of radiation as all harmful, yet the sun radiates heat and so does your fire, radiator, oven and even yourself. It's all radiation, it just happens that people think of radiation as Nuclear and it scares them, yet most is harmless and some are harmful, such as chemo and radiology...and so on."................ Radiation is a means to describe emissions, ie ; Radiation = To Radiate. When one speaks of emissions on the electromagnetic scale, they are assuming you comprehend the basis electromagnetic wavelength and scaling, ie : γ Gamma Radiation. When one is talking about physical radiation, they are assuming you comprehend the concept that particles are emitted, ie α Alpha & β Beta Particles. There are no pure Gamma emissions, Gamma emissions are accompanied by Alpha and Beta emissions. ..........."There you go , I think I've answered your questions above......... You answered nothing apart from highlighting your own ignorance and stupidity. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33794479 02/06/2013 06:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33760964 You fucking idiot. What happened at Chernobyl?..Hydrogen explosion or similar. It didn't stop them working at the other supposed reactors did it. What did they detonate over Hiroshima and Nagasaki?Fuel/air bomb (nepalm or similar) What did they blow up Bikini Atoll with?Large conventional explosives. Why is radiation, and its negative effects on health, apparent in every industry that uses it? ..Because radiation is real but nuclear radiation isn't. How do you explain chemo?...It's a form of radiation that's all. People think of radiation as all harmful, yet the sun radiates heat and so does your fire, radiator, oven and even yourself. It's all radiation, it just happens that people think of radiation as Nuclear and it scares them, yet most is harmless and some are harmful, such as chemo and radiology...and so on. HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?!Not by Nuclear radiation emitting Uranium. How come you can't explain your own fucking theory?How can I explain something that does not exist? "Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? It means what it says. Those plants are run on Hydrogen or methane or something like that and maybe lots more to it as well, except fissioning Uranium. You are utterly uneducated. You can spit ion receiving education from others all you like, but that's much better than pulling unfounded ideas straight from my ass, like you have done.What you think of me is irrelevant. Your galloping assumptions lead nowhere and are based on nothing. Less than worthless.Your gallant assumptions are based on being spoon fed a complete load of lies and you eagerly gobbled them up and refuse to even think that it has a sour taste to it. There you go , I think I've answered your questions above. ................."HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?!Not by Nuclear radiation emitting Uranium."............. It DOES work by radioactive emission, but not using Uranium. Uranium is a mineral, not energy on the electromagnetic spectrum or a particle. ......................."Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? It means what it says. Those plants are run on Hydrogen or methane or something like that and maybe lots more to it as well, except fissioning Uranium.".......... Wrong, completely. ................."How do you explain chemo?...It's a form of radiation that's all. People think of radiation as all harmful, yet the sun radiates heat and so does your fire, radiator, oven and even yourself. It's all radiation, it just happens that people think of radiation as Nuclear and it scares them, yet most is harmless and some are harmful, such as chemo and radiology...and so on."................ Radiation is a means to describe emissions, ie ; Radiation = To Radiate. When one speaks of emissions on the electromagnetic scale, they are assuming you comprehend the basis electromagnetic wavelength and scaling, ie : γ Gamma Radiation. When one is talking about physical radiation, they are assuming you comprehend the concept that particles are emitted, ie α Alpha & β Beta Particles. There are no pure Gamma emissions, Gamma emissions are accompanied by Alpha and Beta emissions. ..........."There you go , I think I've answered your questions above......... You answered nothing apart from highlighting your own ignorance and stupidity. You are truly delusional, and a very efficient thread killing shill, which is all that you are doing here on this thread by spouting your fantastical and unprovable theories on energy generation in an effort to disprove scientific fact. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 16766028 02/06/2013 06:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ................."HOW DOES YOUR FUCKING SMOKE DETECTOR WORK?!Not by Nuclear radiation emitting Uranium."............. It DOES work by radioactive emission, but not using Uranium. Uranium is a mineral, not energy on the electromagnetic spectrum or a particle. ......................."Hydrogen explosions or something like that"? What kind of vague silly bullshit is that? It means what it says. Those plants are run on Hydrogen or methane or something like that and maybe lots more to it as well, except fissioning Uranium.".......... Wrong, completely. ................."How do you explain chemo?...It's a form of radiation that's all. People think of radiation as all harmful, yet the sun radiates heat and so does your fire, radiator, oven and even yourself. It's all radiation, it just happens that people think of radiation as Nuclear and it scares them, yet most is harmless and some are harmful, such as chemo and radiology...and so on."................ Radiation is a means to describe emissions, ie ; Radiation = To Radiate. When one speaks of emissions on the electromagnetic scale, they are assuming you comprehend the basis electromagnetic wavelength and scaling, ie : γ Gamma Radiation. When one is talking about physical radiation, they are assuming you comprehend the concept that particles are emitted, ie α Alpha & β Beta Particles. There are no pure Gamma emissions, Gamma emissions are accompanied by Alpha and Beta emissions. ..........."There you go , I think I've answered your questions above......... You answered nothing apart from highlighting your own ignorance and stupidity. You are truly delusional, and a very efficient thread killing shill, which is all that you are doing here on this thread by spouting your fantastical and unprovable theories on energy generation in an effort to disprove scientific fact. I'm not here to kill this thread. It's a conspiracy site isn't it. My theory for the conspiracy is, it's a conspiracy hidden inside a conspiracy and it's very clever. To accept this, you must put all of what you have been spoon fed into the little filing cabinet at the back of your mind and lock it, then tuck the key into your wallet, on the table beside the cabinet at the back of your mind, then go out of the door and shut it behind you, then sit in the front of your mind and begin to question the possibility of a conspiracy within a conspiracy, as in, does Nuclear power do what we are told it does and is it as dangerous as we are told, or is it not Nuclear fissioning at all and is another means of fuel used that is just about free energy, yet to hide that fact, Nuclear power is born with it's horrendous dangers that will stop prying eyes. It's a lot to think about but to do so, you have to take the tentative steps to that filing cabinet or you will always gobble up whatever they spoon feed you with gusto. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1450139 02/06/2013 10:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33760964 Even TEPCO admits the reality that at least two cores have experienced full meltdown. You must be remarkably ignorant of the topic. And now you're here claiming that the entire nuclear industry is a free energy front? You are a fucking retard, you are derailing an otherwise informative thread, and nobody gives a shit about your half-baked evidence-free ignorant pseudoscience. If you want to examine such a ridiculously far-flung idea, make your own fucking thread, and show up with some fucking proof and evidence next time ya twat. Nobody wants to hear your fanciful unsupported bullshit. 1.) I only base my opinions on facts. You present no evidence or facts. Therefore I would be a fool to believe you, and you are a fool expecting educated people to take you seriously without it. 2.) I'm not worrying myself to death, thank you very much. I'm pursuing an interest. I also intend to be the first to know when there is an immediate cause for worry. That is the whole point of discussing conspiracies and alt news. If that doesn't appeal to you, then why the fuck are you here? 3.) The burden of proof regarding your own crackpot theories is entirely on your shoulders, not mine. Got evidence? Well put up or shut up. The real conspiracy is that nuclear power doesn't exist as we are told and explosions are not nuclear of any kind, just hydrogen explosions or something like that. You are only studying what they want you to study and all your study is based entirely on the theory of it all working. You will never see fissioning in progress but you might see something light up and glow like a fishing rod luminous effect tip light in larger form. That's about it. Believing that chunks of extremely dense, yet somehow harder than titanium can somehow fission and heat water for years on end, is physics fantasy book stuff. It's fiction and if you got a certificate for remembering that fiction, then good on you, but all your certificate means, is, you have a good memory for recalling what you were "told" ..."tutored." Like he said, present your evidence or ![]() |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 373170 02/06/2013 10:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Waterbug User ID: 1295673 02/06/2013 11:17 AM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Louis Slotin would probably have something to say in response to our UK friend's fantasy. As would the downwinders, the people of Japan, Ukraine and the former residents of Bikini.. For the more pragmatic... here is a link to a comprehensive study of the geology of Fukushima.. [link to fukushima.over-blog.fr] more on corium... [link to docs.google.com (secure)] [link to www.simplyinfo.org] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1544469 02/06/2013 11:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1544469 02/06/2013 11:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 16413864 02/06/2013 01:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33389306 02/08/2013 05:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I will look for the Files later but just let me debunk Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33473565 the Myth of a "China Syndrome": A Corium would not melt his Way through the Ground and unlimeted because he get dirty on his Way, we had seen this in Chernobyl for example (Elephants Foot) 4Gb sounxs like a good Read, Domo! I only ask as I had lunch with a Nuclear Mathematician who suggested in passing, the laws of diminishing returns had a bastard twin, on that followed the say principles, but in the opposite direction. As we were in a public forum, I felt it was not the time to ask if this issue was able to reach the Earths core. As I am not sleeping well, I posted here before making a call in the morning. I think the one issue that disregards a China Syndrome, is the mixture of Nuclear Materials Fukushima had on hand at the time of mishap. Well I am not a "nuclear mathematician" but I am an applied mathematician. I suppose he was talking about negative-feedback (stable) processes, and positive-feedback (unstable, diverging) processes. Almost everything in life is negative-feedback. There are some things that are locally positive-feedback, and everyone's real scared of those. The climate fearmongers suggest global temperature is positive-feedback: earth warms, ice melts, earth darkens and absorbs more energy, earth warms faster, and so on. But as we see this year (I am currently looking out my window at a blizzard) that isn't happening. :) In my opinion, not so humble in this company, there's every reason to expect that if Chernobyl got "elephant's foot" there's every reason to expect the same to happen with Fukushima. Maybe several times deeper, heck even if it's 100 or 1000 times deeper (which it hardly could be unless Fukushima's waste can generate that many times more energy, which is not posited) -- so what. It would still be in the top skin of the earth. |
| 1 | 4-24-2011 status report from TEPCO on Fukushima Plant | 04/25/11 |
| Related Topics: Fukushima (Disasters) - Nuclear (Disasters) - View ALL Disasters (Disasters) | ||