Guy Debuks evolution with science!

Shameless bump

One star bandino

img before I get off

Do you speak English?

I have a feeling that most GLPers are just like this guy.

That long with that creepy guy in front of a Sanyo TV trying to speak Italian with his hands, trying to form the Bible into a Science Book?? Ermm No!

Great video OP, I enjoyed it!

Anytime something makes you use your mind and think is always a good thing!

5 Star!





~The Doctor

Bump

shameless

His voice and manner of speaking is very difficult to observe.

Take a Geology course in college and you'll know that evolution has its basis in many many many facts.

There's nothing to debunk about "evolution" guy.. What did you think we were doing when we breed animals and plants together to get desired traits? That is making use of "evolution" directly, and we've been doing it for thousands and thousand of years.

You dumb shit. Evolution has been proven and observed in the lab with yeast.

Breed a horse with wings. I desire it. I would also like take a horse with a pair of antlers. Just for the fun of seeing evolution in action.

with comments like this you show no true desire to learn.

Lost me with the God/Devil bullshit.

Awesome video!

Thanks OP!

Regards,
Sun


For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse.

For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

Rom 1:20-21

Theological BS like the Devil and Gods have no place in scientific explanations of things. Because trying to explain complexity with more complexity is not an explanation at all.

Just watched part of the video. Bedtime now though. Will finish watching tomorrow. Great video.

I'll watch it later for giggles. However, evolution hasn't been debunked. As AC 33337660 said, it's been shown in a lab. One such example can be found here: [link to www.newscientist.com]

To sum up this article:

"Lenski's experiment is also yet another poke in the eye for anti-evolutionists, notes Jerry Coyne, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Chicago. 'The thing I like most is it says you can get these complex traits evolving by a combination of unlikely events,' he says. 'That's just what creationists say can't happen.'"

lol. Lenski's E.coli shuffled a citrate transporter gene closer to an aerobic promoter. There was no new functional information created. Doesn't show or explain any kind of increasingly complex structures. Just a rearrangement of wildtype function. If that's supposed to be a good example of what neo-darwinian processes can accomplish, it is very weak.

That evos keep bringing this e.coli thing up as the star of evolution, gives me great hope that this silly evolution myth is finally losing ground. Common Descent via Evolution is a quasi-religious philosophy that predates Christianity. It survives on philosophical arguments alone.

Well said. As also with the famous fruit fly experiment, they had to give up because all they could produce was fruit flies. Mutated ones, but still clearly fruit flies and nothing else, not even close to becoming something else. And were it not for a zealous religious need to prove their theory, the experiment would have been stopped long before this, if it had been started at all.

I'll never understand how the word 'select' can mean 'produce something that never existed before'. To select is to take out a subset of what already exists, which is actually working against standard evo theory. The gene pool will, at best, reach eventual equilibrium (no net gain or loss) as time goes on, such that the more millions of years pass, the closer to equilibrium it comes. This is standard statistical analysis. Blind natural processes know nothing of "progress" or "fittest".