If God didn't assemble atoms Mr Darwin, who did.... the Atomic Faries Chuck? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33871419 Germany 02/07/2013 12:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | God is a more advanced alien race. They are programmers like we are... Thread: Computer Code Discovered Concealed In Superstring Equations |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 9924188 United States 02/07/2013 12:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How about scientists, like these guys maybe? [link to arstechnica.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 23524705 United States 02/07/2013 12:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey there, I'm a real live nuclear physicist, and I can tell you that atoms are not real, and god certainly didn't assemble them. As far as I can tell neither got nor atom 'exist' in the 'reality as we know it'. Both god and atoms are merely models that describe the behavior of a system we don't understand. The god model is very nice because it requires very little thinking or participation from the user (believer). E.G. Q: how does chemistry work to produce a poison or a medicine? A: God will heal you, and works 'in mysterious ways' or conversely A: There are many different atoms and molecules that we can differentiate between, and lucky for you we know that some are more or less toxic then others and some might even help you in X, Y and Z ways. The atom model is more difficult, it requires much more thought, critical thinking, logic and working memory. The chemistry model is also very powerful, results occour in 'real' reality and are repeatable. The god models is easy, because you only have to remember the one answer that works for all cases. The god model is also very weak, there is no effect of merely believing in an outcome, regardless of what you measure. Of course no one is going to force you to learn chemistry, physics or math, and that's fine, if your model of the universe does not include science, calculus, logic etc, then you'll just have to get by with out it. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28948108 United States 02/07/2013 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22089462 Netherlands 02/07/2013 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I think it was Vishnu and not the Biblical God. Oh wait that answer didn't fit in your retarded thought process. Creating false dichotomies is all you can do. Go and find actual evidence that your deluded worldview is true, even if the big bang theory is utterly wrong then it in no way would provide a single shred of validity to your delusions. |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/07/2013 01:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey there, I'm a real live nuclear physicist, and I can tell you that atoms are not real, and god certainly didn't assemble them. As far as I can tell neither got nor atom 'exist' in the 'reality as we know it'. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23524705 Both god and atoms are merely models that describe the behavior of a system we don't understand. The god model is very nice because it requires very little thinking or participation from the user (believer). E.G. Q: how does chemistry work to produce a poison or a medicine? A: God will heal you, and works 'in mysterious ways' or conversely A: There are many different atoms and molecules that we can differentiate between, and lucky for you we know that some are more or less toxic then others and some might even help you in X, Y and Z ways. The atom model is more difficult, it requires much more thought, critical thinking, logic and working memory. The chemistry model is also very powerful, results occour in 'real' reality and are repeatable. The god models is easy, because you only have to remember the one answer that works for all cases. The god model is also very weak, there is no effect of merely believing in an outcome, regardless of what you measure. Of course no one is going to force you to learn chemistry, physics or math, and that's fine, if your model of the universe does not include science, calculus, logic etc, then you'll just have to get by with out it. QUOTE; "if your model of the universe does not include science, calculus, logic etc, then you'll just have to get by with out it" The consequence of Adam's stealing from God's tree was the forfeiture of divine education as you well cited, the results continue to prove man cannot achieve global Garden of Eden without them. Good reply. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33877377 United Kingdom 02/07/2013 01:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28948108 United States 02/07/2013 02:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/07/2013 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30057079 Canada 02/07/2013 06:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/07/2013 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33897541 Australia 02/07/2013 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33887752 United Kingdom 02/07/2013 09:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32961307 United States 02/07/2013 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hey there, I'm a real live nuclear physicist, and I can tell you that atoms are not real, and god certainly didn't assemble them. As far as I can tell neither got nor atom 'exist' in the 'reality as we know it'. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 23524705 It makes me Very happy that you said this! I now KNOW it's true, but only through digging and then knowing i couldnt really be reading it right (i was) and even then it took me awhile to assimilate. One day I decided to look into whether we know as much as we claim to, and by fuggin george we DO NOT. And it's admitted right in the math. i'm terrible at math and was sorta scared to even look. But they just stated that they didnt know and were making up a value to stand in for it. Making it up! blew me little mind. I've started mentioning this to people and they think it's incorrect. Everything is "real". Well of course, that's what they and I were taught! I wanted to see a picture of an atom,,,, what???? there's NO such picture??? Ha! recently some dick headline about photo of atom, i looked and no better than photos of "ectoplasm"! I'm wondering about particle tracks now. and how the colliders present these( tho I could only find a few) as proof of different particles. Any thoughts on that? All that $$$$$ for those??? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 589518 Australia 02/07/2013 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 2379303 United States 02/07/2013 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/07/2013 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 32961307 United States 02/07/2013 11:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wanted to let you know I'm glad of your relentless persistence in posting these Darwin attacking threads. There's always something interesting going on inside them. i'm not a christian, but interested in it for my own reasons. I just read Aquinas' 5 proofs of god, and really dug it. I read a lot of books, writings by various scientists and they are often claiming to be figuring out the mechanisms and chemicals and how any day we will be as god. I had the thought- there's nothing new under the sun... that even if we DO figure it all out, we still won't be doing it with anything that wasn't already here long before us, for reasons we have no clue about. We merely replicating, or reorganizing the same stuff that God? gave us in the first place. Nobody can make anything with anything that God didn't already make first. |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/08/2013 12:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I wanted to let you know I'm glad of your relentless persistence in posting these Darwin attacking threads. There's always something interesting going on inside them. i'm not a christian, but interested in it for my own reasons. I just read Aquinas' 5 proofs of god, and really dug it. I read a lot of books, writings by various scientists and they are often claiming to be figuring out the mechanisms and chemicals and how any day we will be as god. I had the thought- there's nothing new under the sun... that even if we DO figure it all out, we still won't be doing it with anything that wasn't already here long before us, for reasons we have no clue about. We merely replicating, or reorganizing the same stuff that God? gave us in the first place. Nobody can make anything with anything that God didn't already make first. Yeah... imagine asking all the scientists in the world to make one of these... outta dirt? Last Edited by DGN on 02/08/2013 12:14 AM |
CelestialMaiden User ID: 30718771 United States 02/08/2013 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @DGN I'd love to explain things to you but looking at your threads I just have to shake my head and remember the quote Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2379303 You can't cure stupid. I would love to explain things to Darwin...but as I look at his theory...I just have to shake my head and remember the quote: |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/08/2013 12:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | @DGN I'd love to explain things to you but looking at your threads I just have to shake my head and remember the quote Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2379303 You can't cure stupid. I would love to explain things to Darwin...but as I look at his theory...I just have to shake my head and remember the quote: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33447673 United States 02/08/2013 12:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
LSDreamer User ID: 14896274 Australia 02/08/2013 12:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Charles Darwin never studied physics. He was a naturalist and his theory was that species evolved from common ancestors. Evolution explains the diversity of species, not how life began and certainly not before that. Human decency is not derived from religion. It precedes it. ~ Christopher Hitchens. |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/08/2013 12:46 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well jallaluyah! Dgn iz bak in da houz... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33447673 Spew on brutha ignant... How am I doing? Just a few highlights from my ecno vacation... couldn't resist the sweet mud.. Last Edited by DGN on 02/08/2013 12:49 AM |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/09/2013 01:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Charles Darwin never studied physics. He was a naturalist and his theory was that species evolved from common ancestors. Evolution explains the diversity of species, not how life began and certainly not before that. Quoting: LSDreamer QUOTE; "Evolution explains the diversity of species" I always miss that part. How does it work, perfection thru mutation, like cancer right? That's the only evidence of evolution ever found. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 31416609 United Kingdom 02/09/2013 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 12064276 United States 02/09/2013 05:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 904314 Canada 02/09/2013 05:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
DGN (OP) User ID: 30782865 United States 02/09/2013 06:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is most amusing, as Darwin has nothing to do with atoms, and atoms don't actually exist, at least not in a way that would involve "assembling". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 904314 So if atoms aren't deliberately assembled, how do explain the numerical pattern of this? Last Edited by DGN on 02/09/2013 06:12 PM |
CelestialMaiden User ID: 30718771 United States 02/09/2013 10:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is most amusing, as Darwin has nothing to do with atoms, and atoms don't actually exist, at least not in a way that would involve "assembling". Quoting: Anonymous Coward 904314 So if atoms aren't deliberately assembled, how do explain the numerical pattern of this? lets just face it, it all happened like THIS |