9/11 was the only televised event to have ever garnered a 100 share rating.

What else would they have been watching?

Even in Australia every channel was tuned in to New York.

all the channels here in Holland were broadcasting 9/11 too. You could not see something else.

There has never been another event to even come close to a 100 share. Don't you see that for every station and channel to either be televising the attacks or to be off air would have to be coordinated months in advance?

What else could they be watching? I suppose that HBO could have been televising movies like they are paid to do. The Home Shopping Network could have been selling stuff on air like they were supposed to. 9/11 was not the end of the world, it was not the appocalypse, it was an even that most people don't event talk about anymore.

But on that day, everyone was talking about it. Or hiding at home. Even here, the next day, the shopping centers were all but deserted. People didn't feel safe outside.

You seem to have forgotten the reality of those days.

heck we were even watching it in my homeroom geography class in middleschool. but it was clearly a conspiracy; thermite anyone? yep. thermite.

The entire point is that everyone was talking about it BECAUSE it was on every news channel and every new channel was in 100% full-on fearmonger mode.

It's been proven that the planes were digital inserts and that no real 747 could have flown at those speeds and low altitudes without disintegrating, so the idea that it was a manufactured media event is far from new.

Thermite could not have dustified the towers. They were brought down with demolition nukes that were placed there before the towers were even built.

Thanks

And the viewing population of the world greeted satan.

Revelation 9.11

And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.

Thermite could not have dustified the towers. They were brought down with demolition nukes that were placed there before the towers were even built.


That's 28 years. Nukes don't last nearly that long without regular maintenance. There are components that degrade after just a few years and have to be replaced to keep it functional.

1.) Depends on the type of nuke

2.) There's no reason why the nukes had to have been there the entire time. It could have simply been that a shaft was drilled ahead of time with the plan that the bomb would be armed with nuclear material when the time came to demolish the towers.

Watch the entire video and you'll see that thermite cannot have been the cause of collapse.

For one thing, the towers were dustified by a shockwave which left a lot of the flexible paper undamaged by the rigid steel and concrete pulverized. Only a shock from an underground demolition nuke could have done that.

Conventional explosives would have burned up the paper.

And a nuclear weapon wouldn't have?