I will digress a bit before I enter my reply to the OP's post.

I think it was yesterday that I read Mr. Obvious's post stating her absolute abhorrent attitude towards the sheeple. (Basically, she REALLY doesn't like them.)

I kind of felt bad about that because, not only are my (real) friends all sheeple, EVERYONE I KNOW IS A SHEEPLE! So what does that mean?

The word "sheeple" clearly implies that people are like sheep. And sheep are dumb animals (meaning that they can't speak). But sheep are also dumb in that they couldn't possibly comprehend whatever is going on in the governments of wherever their pasture is. And de facto, neither can the sheeple of the USA (and elsewhere).

So, my conclusion has always been to treat my friends and family as the dumb animals that they are; and this way I can live in peace.

But I think it's quite ironic that Mr. Obvious had her "day in court" just prior to this post which is five days before the Supreme Court "hearing" (as if they even intend to listen to any of this). My conclusion is that Mr. Obvious has every right to feel as she does about utterly OBVIOUS ignorance of her fellow countrymen, who by their own choice to be utterly ignorant, have allowed an ignominious usurper to take over the United States of America without having to fire a single shot (that we know of).

But there are shots that will be fired that we will know of when his "Civilian Army" (TSA, etc) take to the streets against a completely unarmed citizenry just as Stalin, Hitler and Mao did in the previous century.

And who is or are to blame? Why it's the sheeple, of course. Without their totally mindless support, none of this would have ever happened.

Anyway, my direct reply to this post is that I read Orly Taitz's entire article. I absolutely believe EVERYTHING that she states in that article and I would like to post some of my favorite passages of her article here...

(All of the text below has been copy/pasted from Orly Taitz's article...)

ACTIONS OF THE U.S. ATTORNEYS, AGS AND JUDGES DURING OBAMA REGIME ARE AKIN TO ACTIONS OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND JUDICIARY IN NAZI GERMANY FROM 1932 TILL 1932, AND IF NOT CHANGED WILL LEAD TO THE PATTERN OF NAZI GERMANY FROM 1942-1945.

What is the most troubling is not that a criminal with forged IDs like Obama was able to get in the White House, but the magnitude of corruption, lawlessness, criminality and flagrant treason in the top positions of power in the U.S. Government and judiciary, as well as regime controlled media. This brief is not only a statement of facts, but also a warning that if members of the judiciary do not clean up their act, do not stop being criminality complicit with our Criminal in Chief, this country will descend to the levels of NAZI Germany in 1940s.

The similarity to NAZI Germany is startling. In 1932 when Hitler came to power there were thousands of highly educated judges in Germany, graduates of the world renown universities of Heidelberg and Berlin, Germany had a Constitution. However, either out of fear or due to corruption being bought and paid for, those judges simply ignored the Constitution and looked the other way when thousands were denied their Constitutional rights, when later they were deprived of their property and any economic rights and ultimately deprived of liberty and life itself.


Since Obama’s eligibility is based on forged and stolen IDs, he never qualified and can never qualify as a natural born U.S. citizen status cannot be acquired retroactively. Since Obama never qualified, his selection of the Vice Presidential candidate was not constitutional either, the whole ticket was unconstitutional.



3. Due to the fact that this is the most important case of National Security and due to the fact that justices of the Supreme Court were clueless about other cases brought before them and supposedly discussed in conference and due to the fact that on prior occasions clerks of the court and other employees of the Supreme Court have hidden cases from the justices, there have to be the actual signatures of the justices showing that they actually read the case, that it was not ruled upon by the employees of the court who have hidden the case from the justices and simply printed an order.


(Bold print highlighted by me...)