Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,022 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 906,651
Pageviews Today: 1,174,227Threads Today: 268Posts Today: 3,472
09:38 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013

 
ExoPoliChick

User ID: 31770180
Canada
02/10/2013 05:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
It'll never happen and they know it. That's why they scheduled it for after the passing of 2012 DA14...or should I say impact?

eyebat

Last Edited by *Ozone Baby* on 02/10/2013 05:56 PM
Traveler of both time and space ~~~~


Nobody told me there'd be days like these....Strange days indeed!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"It is our innate solidarity - not some despotism of the sky - that is our source of morality and sense of decency."
~ Hitchens

"The essence of the independent mind is not in what it thinks, but how it thinks."
~ Hitchens

"A mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam."
~ Sagan

I LOVE science and I LOVE space but I am hugely skeptical and don't trust a word NASA says.
RockHall

User ID: 33955437
United States
02/10/2013 05:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
The fact that the Supreme Court is even willing to look at this case astounds me. Every case in every court has ultimately been thrown out so far. So, what purpose does they elite have to allow this particular case to move forward? It really doesn't benefit them in any way. Why not just sweep it under the rug one last and final time?

Is it possible that Barack is the false flag himself? What if irrefutable evidence of fraud surfaced at the hearing? The Nation would be in Crisis and torn in two. Liberals would be contending it doesn't matter, he was already elected by the People. Conservatives and Independents would demand he be stripped of Office and be arrested. There's no doubt in my mind that people could get very nasty over this issue.

Thoughts?
 Quoting: Squatch Hunter


The cases against Obama have never been thrown out on merit, only for lack of standing. That's why in this case, the plaintiffs are former presidential candidates. They needed standing to show injury. In any event, the only thing necessary to expose the fraud and sham Obama would be for SCOTUS to authorize a discovery phase.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33931923


Here, here!
"I think, therefore I am..."
René Descartes

"I don't think, therefore I am not..."
RockHall
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1210507
United States
02/10/2013 06:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
[link to jahtruth.net]

- A Call to Action - What You Can Do To Help

Please Click Here to find out what you can do to help JAH bring Truth; Justice and True Freedom to Planet Earth.

[link to jahtruth.net]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1210507
United States
02/10/2013 06:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
[link to jahtruth.net]

- A Call to Action - What You Can Do To Help

Please Click Here to find out what you can do to help JAH bring Truth; Justice and True Freedom to Planet Earth.

[link to jahtruth.net]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1210507


This is of the utmost importance because the world cannot continue on its present course or there will soon be, exactly as the Scriptures state, no flesh left alive on the Earth. The only Way to stop the world and turn it around is by recovering The Ark and showing people it is not a myth or a fairy story and showing the people God's Law and how fair and just it is for everyone, rather than like men's laws that favour only the rich. That is why the rich people made up their laws, in defiance of God, in the first place and now want to disarm everyone, also in defiance of God, so the sheeple will be unable to resist being driven further into slavery by Satan's NWO.

[link to jahtruth.net] cool2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 27794780
United States
02/10/2013 06:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Nothing will happen once again. Evil knows no bounds and since the '60's they only refer to their agenda. Bigger steps will have to be taken and by the world since now they will be involved.

Prepare!
katballoo

User ID: 34065818
Canada
02/10/2013 06:18 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
The fact that the Supreme Court is even willing to look at this case astounds me. Every case in every court has ultimately been thrown out so far. So, what purpose does they elite have to allow this particular case to move forward? It really doesn't benefit them in any way. Why not just sweep it under the rug one last and final time?

Is it possible that Barack is the false flag himself? What if irrefutable evidence of fraud surfaced at the hearing? The Nation would be in Crisis and torn in two. Liberals would be contending it doesn't matter, he was already elected by the People. Conservatives and Independents would demand he be stripped of Office and be arrested. There's no doubt in my mind that people could get very nasty over this issue.

Thoughts?
 Quoting: Squatch Hunter


On one hand, the supreme court could be willing to look at this case in order to appease the people. Once they have looked at the case, they can choose to throw it out for whatever reason, and silence the people, once and for all. On the other hand, this could be the way to bring on a civil war, and the fall of America.

There is also the possibility that a huge catastrophe could be on the horizon, that would overshadow this whole case. Something like a very powerful earthquake in California would probably take care of the problem.

Thoughts?
katballoo

User ID: 34065818
Canada
02/10/2013 06:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
The fact that the Supreme Court is even willing to look at this case astounds me. Every case in every court has ultimately been thrown out so far. So, what purpose does they elite have to allow this particular case to move forward? It really doesn't benefit them in any way. Why not just sweep it under the rug one last and final time?

Is it possible that Barack is the false flag himself? What if irrefutable evidence of fraud surfaced at the hearing? The Nation would be in Crisis and torn in two. Liberals would be contending it doesn't matter, he was already elected by the People. Conservatives and Independents would demand he be stripped of Office and be arrested. There's no doubt in my mind that people could get very nasty over this issue.

Thoughts?
 Quoting: Squatch Hunter


yeah i have been trying to wrap my head around what they exactly intend on accomplishing by letting this play out. i mean if orly posed a genuine threat to the elites plans, they would just have her killed in a heartbeat. the only thing I can think of is by letting this play out maybe it will lead eventually to riots or mass chaos but that is only one outcome i can think of. all i can do is speculate on the possibilities.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33288026


I would imagine that if plan A fails, they have plan B, C, D, or E to choose from. This has been orchestrated to suit them for so long now, that I am sure they have many cards up their very long sleeves.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34102026
United States
02/10/2013 06:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
I think this is the month that the house of cards starts to fall. But how will the MSM cover it?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28649819


Like they usually do.

By focusing on kitties in trees and invented fantasies of white racism.
 Quoting: Professor Xavier


don't get upset, just quite paying taxes. If he doesn't have to follow the ru ns neither do we.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34102026
United States
02/10/2013 06:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
I think this is the month that the house of cards starts to fall. But how will the MSM cover it?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28649819


Like they usually do.

By focusing on kitties in trees and invented fantasies of white racism.
 Quoting: Professor Xavier


don't get upset, just quite paying taxes. If he doesn't have to follow the ru ns neither do we.
Wisconsin

User ID: 33807501
United States
02/10/2013 06:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Please, God, just once, let a US judge uphold his oath involving an Obama case.

pray

5stars
 Quoting: Professor Xavier


but he's black.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30804735


.
... mom was "white" ...
.
Amos 5:13
timelines and Celebrations of Yeshua - [link to www.grafted-promise.net]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33558454
United States
02/10/2013 07:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Think "backlash" card.
Fire WatchModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 33753048
United States
02/10/2013 08:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
bump
When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. Thomas Jefferson
-------------------------------------
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson
snake.plissken
call me snake...

User ID: 18821294
United States
02/10/2013 09:39 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
From the US Supreme Court's web site, see the following:

(snip - snake)

Link: [link to www.supremecourt.gov]

(snip - snake)

"If you want to get rid of Obamacare, you have to get rid of Obama..."

Chief Justice Roberts decision to switch his vote on Obama's Individual Mandate, resulting in the 5-4 decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act, was widely-viewed as his [Roberts] attempt to preserve the Court's capital to take on other big issues.

There is no bigger issue than Obama's eligibility to hold the highest office in the land.

Perhaps, Roberts may have been waiting for this very case to come before him and his court, to strike down Obama, and with him, everything this criminal has done while fraudulently holding the office of POTUS.



snake
 Quoting: snake.plissken

Excellent point, Snake. Bravo!!
 Quoting: Éireann


Thanks, Éireann. While I would be very pleasantly-surprised, if the SCOTUS actually hears/rules on Obama's eligibility, it's obviously a long-shot.

Regardless, let's say for the sake of argument that all five of the conservative-leaning Supreme Court justices agree to hear this case (after it's been polished-up, spell/grammar-corrected). Two of the remaining four liberal-leaning justices, appointed by Obama - Sotomayor and Kagen - *should* recuse themselves, which, however, is not a forgone conclusion.

See the following Wisconsin Law Review analysis entitled "THE (UN)CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SUPREME COURT RECUSAL STANDARDS", by Louis J. Virelli:

[link to wisconsinlawreview.org]

If Sotomayor and Kagen were to recuse themselves, we'd likely see a 5-2 decision (perhaps even 4-3, if Roberts wanted to be viewed historically, as "impartial" and/or "maintaining the integrity of the court") or a 5-4 decision if they remained, holding that Obama did not/does not meet the requirements set forth in Article II, Section 1 to be eligible for POTUS. This would mean Barack Soebarkah/Soetoro broke several laws by representing that his name was/is Barack Hussein Obama, and that he was born in Hawaii. Not only would "Obama" be facing jail time, but also deportation to Kenya.

The SCOTUS justices would also had to have considered the United States Presidential Line of Succession, through interpreting Article II, Section 1, Section 3 of the 20th Amendment, and finally in the 25th Amendment.

Hypothetically, if this were to play out along these lines, John Boehner might be appointed acting POTUS, until the next election of 2016. The SCOTUS couldn't allow Biden to take over, as his election to VPOTUS would likely be set aside (not to mention the fact that he would simply pardon "Obama", just as Ford did for Nixon).

The result:

- "Obama" would be headed for USP Leavenworth, after sentencing
- all laws signed by "Obama" would become null and void
- justices Sotomayor and Kagen would be removed
- in 2016, candidates for POTUS would be required to certify their eligibility under Article II, Section 1 of the US Constitution, with each of the 50 states.

ochange
we can believe in


snake

Last Edited by snake.plissken on 02/10/2013 09:56 PM
NoSilence (OP)

User ID: 34042581
Mexico
02/10/2013 09:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
From the US Supreme Court's web site, see the following:

(snip - snake)

Link: [link to www.supremecourt.gov]

(snip - snake)

"If you want to get rid of Obamacare, you have to get rid of Obama..."

Chief Justice Roberts decision to switch his vote on Obama's Individual Mandate, resulting in the 5-4 decision that upheld the Affordable Care Act, was widely-viewed as his [Roberts] attempt to preserve the Court's capital to take on other big issues.

There is no bigger issue than Obama's eligibility to hold the highest office in the land.

Perhaps, Roberts may have been waiting for this very case to come before him and his court, to strike down Obama, and with him, everything this criminal has done while fraudulently holding the office of POTUS.



snake
 Quoting: snake.plissken

Excellent point, Snake. Bravo!!
 Quoting: Éireann


Thanks, Éireann. While I would be very pleasantly-surprised, if the SCOTUS actually hears/rules on Obama's eligibility, it's obviously a long-shot.

Regardless, let's say for the sake of argument that all five of the conservative-leaning Supreme Court justices agree to hear this case (after it's been polished-up, spell/grammar-corrected). Two of the remaining four liberal-leaning justices, appointed by Obama - Sotomayor and Kagen - *should* recuse themselves, which, however, is not a forgone conclusion.

See the following Wisconsin Law Review analysis entitled "THE (UN)CONSTITUTIONALITY OF SUPREME COURT RECUSAL STANDARDS", by Louis J. Virelli:

[link to wisconsinlawreview.org]

If Sotomayor and Kagen were to recuse themselves, we'd likely see a 5-2 decision (perhaps even 4-3, if Roberts wanted to be viewed historically, as "impartial" and/or "maintaining the integrity of the court") or a 5-4 decision if they remained, holding that Obama did not/does not meet the requirements set forth in Article II, Section 1 to be eligible for POTUS. This would mean Barack Soebarkah/Soetoro broke several laws by representing that his name was/is Barack Hussein Obama, and that he was born in Hawaii. Not only would "Obama" be facing jail time, but also deportation to Kenya.

The SCOTUS justices would also had to have considered the United States Presidential Line of Succession, through interpreting Article II, Section 1, Section 3 of the 20th Amendment, and finally in the 25th Amendment.

Hypothetically, if this were to play out along these lines, John Boehner might be appointed acting POTUS, until the next election of 2016. The SCOTUS couldn't allow Biden to take over, as his election to VPOTUS might be set aside, by default (not to mention the fact that he would simply pardon "Obama", just as Ford did for Nixon). The result:

- "Obama" would be headed for USP Leavenworth, after sentencing
- all laws signed by "Obama" would become null and void
- justices Sotomayor and Kagen would be removed
- in 2016, candidates for POTUS would be required to certify their eligibility under Article II, Section 1 of the US Constitution, with each of the 50 states.

ochange
iamwith


snake
 Quoting: snake.plissken

Good catch Snake...hf
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
Mark Twain
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/10/2013 10:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Orly thinks Roberts may be being blackmailed by Obama over his adopted children.

Chicago politics.

[link to www.orlytaitzesq.com]

They are irish and not Latin American.

She thinks he was blackmailed over Obamacare too.

They are hearing the case behind closed doors and he has the casting vote.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/10/2013 10:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Think "backlash" card.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33558454


Yeah. He gets to destroy the country either way.

It's a win win situation for him.

The only thing that may temper is that a lot of people already know about him.

I tell the hardcore bots they should defend him to the death.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/10/2013 10:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
It'll never happen and they know it. That's why they scheduled it for after the passing of 2012 DA14...or should I say impact?

eyebat
 Quoting: ExoPoliChick


Just in case ... Obama has dirt on Roberts.

That's how he probably made his way up the ladder.

His first election he won by spreading dirt.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/10/2013 10:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Year of the Snake.

Up the greasy ladder ... down the slippery snake.
IRME™

User ID: 13526574
United States
02/10/2013 11:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
OR..........The Feb 16 date is a trick, it will be called fri the 15th & they will close the case as a NO SHOW!!
"If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance."

Orville Wright
NoSilence (OP)

User ID: 34042581
Mexico
02/10/2013 11:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
OR..........The Feb 16 date is a trick, it will be called fri the 15th & they will close the case as a NO SHOW!!
 Quoting: IRME™


No. 12A606
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.

-------------------------------------------------------

Feb.16, could be a typo..From Orly Taitz website..
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
Mark Twain
Brightwinger

User ID: 833683
United States
02/10/2013 11:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Why is the hearing closed? Are these sorts of things usually closed?

Also, the court usually takes its time to issue a decision. Let's see if they all remain healthy until this is finally resolved.

Breitbart's face suddenly turned red before he died. Apparently that sort of death the person turns blue. (Or is it the other way around? In any case, Breitbart's symptoms weren't what are seen during a sudden heart atttack.)
Author, inventor, disorganizer. Let's disorganize the American Cancer Society.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 24186242
United States
02/11/2013 12:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
The source of the Connecticut-based Social Security number has never been answered.

It first appears in verified records when the Obama's bought property in Chicago in 1986. The number was issued in March of 1977 in between the 16th and 21st.

"042-68-4424 -- March 21, 1977 -- Thomas Louis Wood -- Newington, Connecticut
042-68-4425 -- March ??, 1977 -- Barack Hussein Obama -- Honolulu, Hawaii
042-68-4429 -- March 16, 1977 -- Paul Michael Graziano -- Yorktown, Connecticut "


[link to www.t-room.us]


The Social Security number appears on an apparently forged Selective Service document that was supposed to be filled out in Hawaii in 1980. But that document has been shown to be a fraud in many ways - the most obvious is that the stamp on it bears only an 80 and not the full year of 1980 as every other selective record of the time has. Also the form was supposed to be filled in Hawaii in 1980. Obama spent 1980 in California. There is no record of him going to Hawaii and being there in August of 1980.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34000636


“If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”- James Madison.

Obama’s Home Town:
CHICAGO POLICE CAN'T HANDLE CHICAGO CRIME 5-10-2010;
[link to www.youtube.com]
Google this: Semion Mogilevich

After spending some time in New York allegedly working under the name “Obama”, It appears Barry used the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" for the first time to file his federal taxes in Connecticut at a Post Office Box for the purpose of evading paying taxes in New York and /or to establish a new identity. (This is a felony with no statute of limitation.)
When the IRS received Barry Soetoro’s federal tax filing, the IRS could not attach the name Barrack Hussein Obama to the SSI number provided or the address provided. So the IRS assigned the fictitious name "Barrack Hussein Obama" a tax ID number for a person from Connecticut (Where Barry unlawfully filed a federal tax form using a false name). Barry Soetoro began using the tax ID number as his SSI number when using the fictitious name Barrack Obama. This is why Barry Soetoro has a Connecticut SSI number. When I worked for the IRS, I saw this occur more than once and yes, it is a felony to knowingly file a fraudulent federal tax forms. Most of the politicians that cheat on their taxes claim it was an accident. That is how they get away with their tax cheat crimes. Using a fake name is no accident.

[link to www.citizens4freedom.com]

Crime:
"An action or omission that constitutes an offense that may be prosecuted by the state and is punishable by law."

Meaning, by their omission of the "terms" of the contract, the "people" ignorantly commit perjury by "signing contracts with them", claiming to be state or federal employees, instead of one of the "people", instead of taking oaths as Trust Administrators.

Do the Administrators of the Public Trust, have the Trust of the People is the question.

I would say no. And that is a understatement of certainty

Christian Martyrs: Be prepared to CRY! :
[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/11/2013 12:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
OR..........The Feb 16 date is a trick, it will be called fri the 15th & they will close the case as a NO SHOW!!
 Quoting: IRME™


No. 12A606
Title:
Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants
v.
Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California
Case Nos.: (S207078)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012 Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Court.

-------------------------------------------------------

Feb.16, could be a typo..From Orly Taitz website..
 Quoting: NoSilence




I tweeted her about it but she hasn't sent anything out.

She makes a lot of typos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/11/2013 12:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
She is back to the 15th again now.

It must be the 15th.

[link to www.orlytaitzesq.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/11/2013 12:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Double doom date.

It's a GLP first.
thinkingoutsidetherho​mbus

User ID: 32161741
United States
02/11/2013 01:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
The fact that the Supreme Court is even willing to look at this case astounds me. Every case in every court has ultimately been thrown out so far. So, what purpose does they elite have to allow this particular case to move forward? It really doesn't benefit them in any way. Why not just sweep it under the rug one last and final time?

Is it possible that Barack is the false flag himself? What if irrefutable evidence of fraud surfaced at the hearing? The Nation would be in Crisis and torn in two. Liberals would be contending it doesn't matter, he was already elected by the People. Conservatives and Independents would demand he be stripped of Office and be arrested. There's no doubt in my mind that people could get very nasty over this issue.

Thoughts?
 Quoting: Squatch Hunter


During his first campaign, Oprah declared that he was "the one." Maybe the one who renders us a shadow of our once great nation.
I don't know where you get your delusions, laser brain.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/11/2013 01:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
I'm glad they have to nail their colours to the mast.

They will have to make a decision.

That's assuming we get past the asteroid and or whatever false flag he has up his sleeve.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20756371
United Kingdom
02/11/2013 01:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
I do think it's been set purposely for this date.

They know whatever happens the asteroid will be the news.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33927266
Hong Kong
02/11/2013 01:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
Orly Taitz:
Wow! over 27,000 signatures on my petition to the U.S. Congress to immediately investigate Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen SSN!!! Please, sign the petition!

[link to www.orlytaitzesq.com]
 Quoting: NoSilence


Queeen of the birthtards.

Master of the hysterical outrage machine.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33927266
Hong Kong
02/11/2013 01:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: OBAMA: Supplemental brief for the Supreme Court of the United States.. scheduled to be heard on February 15, 2013
I do think it's been set purposely for this date.

They know whatever happens the asteroid will be the news.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20756371


Its not that, its that people honestly do not give a shit outside of the birthtard community of losers.

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!