Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,232 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 975,091
Pageviews Today: 1,211,243Threads Today: 153Posts Today: 3,194
08:56 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Minnesota Nuclear Snow?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 03:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
[link to radiationnetwork.com]

[link to imageshack.us]

71 thats no good
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 03:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
[link to img32.imageshack.us]

88!

siren2
Blackhawkie

User ID: 29817921
United States
02/10/2013 03:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
999
You ever see Ranger Batman in his batman costume, very dapper. Do you like 3 siren alerts? --Hawk-02
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 03:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
its pretty steady....78, 84, 87, 88
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 03:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
82

bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33985571
United States
02/10/2013 03:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
I bet the NE has it also.. Someone needs to test it there too. All that toxic snow...
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 03:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
91

[link to imageshack.us]


siren2siren2siren2siren2
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 03:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
bump
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 04:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
nobody cares I guess..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32876549
United States
02/10/2013 04:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
Dang...
It just hit 97.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 23263980
United States
02/10/2013 04:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
I care...scary stuff. Best way to avoid danger is to stay inside?
Skepticnumberone

User ID: 34052685
United States
02/10/2013 04:35 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
Sometimes the reading shoot up like that before an earthquake. However, it could very well be the snow.
Skepticnumberone
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32876549
United States
02/10/2013 04:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
Hey, wait a minute...
Take a look at the legend, the monitoring station in northern Mn is of the "pancake" style.

"*Readings not Equalized means the Monitoring Stations are broadcasting the raw radiation count from their Geiger counters, without adjustment for different count rates existing between various Geiger counter designs. For instance, models built around a "Pancake" (see Map Legend) style of Geiger-Mueller tube typically have about a 3 times count rate over Standard tubed models, so their readings in CPM would be expected to average about 3 times higher."
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 04:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
Hey, wait a minute...
Take a look at the legend, the monitoring station in northern Mn is of the "pancake" style.

"*Readings not Equalized means the Monitoring Stations are broadcasting the raw radiation count from their Geiger counters, without adjustment for different count rates existing between various Geiger counter designs. For instance, models built around a "Pancake" (see Map Legend) style of Geiger-Mueller tube typically have about a 3 times count rate over Standard tubed models, so their readings in CPM would be expected to average about 3 times higher."
 Quoting: Tyr_Birfrost


Its more accurate, but the pancake detector doesn't detect shit that isn't there.
and its CPM so CPM is not a guess or maybe 3 times higher BS, it is what it is.





Alert Level = 100 CPM

real alert level 65+
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 04:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
its still 80+ thats no good.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 05:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
look at the other pancake style with the bold circle outline.
they aren't in the 80's.

I agree Radiation Network is pretty dodgy in there wording....maybe some radiation dick will chime in.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 05:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
93 that cant be good
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34082536
United States
02/10/2013 05:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
93 that cant be good
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33960719
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 05:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
[link to imageshack.us]

95 come on!

thats no good
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 05:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
scream
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 05:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
nuke
JUST HERE

User ID: 25610447
United States
02/10/2013 05:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
good catch OP , 5 stars and a pin suggestion
:glp sign:
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 05:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
good catch OP , 5 stars and a :pin: suggestion
 Quoting: JUST HERE


hf
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 33960719
Canada
02/10/2013 05:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
burnitsheeplebah
WISC

User ID: 1234074
United States
02/10/2013 05:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
bump2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34100484
Netherlands
02/10/2013 05:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
I had dark snot instead of dusty.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34102502
United States
02/10/2013 06:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
Just hit 99, yikes!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33825975
United States
02/10/2013 06:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
102
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 31907650
United States
02/10/2013 06:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
Its not that no one cares, but I don't know what you're talking about, what the implications are of readings like this. Not everyone is a weather wonk. I'm interested in this but need more info. Are you saying there are high radiation readings in the snow in MN? Why would that be?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33825975
United States
02/10/2013 06:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
102
[link to imageshack.us]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33825975
United States
02/10/2013 06:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Minnesota Nuclear Snow?
Its not that no one cares, but I don't know what you're talking about, what the implications are of readings like this. Not everyone is a weather wonk. I'm interested in this but need more info. Are you saying there are high radiation readings in the snow in MN? Why would that be?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31907650


The "old" alert level used to be 50 cpm. Now it's 100 cpm. There's a very high reading 102. Not just the snow but the air. Higher readings around that area off/on last year also.

News