Obama Care- Aren't you glad you voted for Obama? | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33934896 United States 02/11/2013 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I had a talk with a 65 year old man who did vote for him. (I'm 60) He so proudly said "I read o-care, it's great" My answer, think its so great? Have you read the part about the level 2 devices.... Have you read the part of the death panel who is no more than the IRS/acorn staff You just condemned yourself ...you have only 5 years left to live. That's O- care, that's what you voted for |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30968062 United States 02/11/2013 11:25 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Desert Fox User ID: 8786935 United States 02/11/2013 11:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
*HEISENBERG* User ID: 14560333 United States 02/11/2013 11:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1259549 United States 02/11/2013 11:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Desert Fox User ID: 8786935 United States 02/11/2013 11:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19980561 United States 02/11/2013 11:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I got this email this morning. This sucks for old people. It will more than likely end up being a nightmare for everyone at some point or another. Quoting: Etta Anybody who voted for Obama deserves the treatment, unfortunately us too who didn't vote for him. Get ready, and hide your money because Obama will have access to it. I........ Your hospital Medicare admittance has just changed under Obama Care. You must be admitted by your primary Physician in order for Medicare to pay for it! If you are admitted by an emergency room doctor it is treated as outpatient care where hospital costs are not covered. This is only the tip of the iceberg for Obama Care. Just wait to see what happen in 2013 & 2014! Age 76 Today, I went to the Dr. for my monthly B12 shot that I have been getting for a number of years. The nurse came and got me, got out the needle filled and ready to go then looked at the computer and got very quiet and asked if I was prepared to pay for it. I said no that my insurance takes care of it. She said, that Medicare had turned it down and went to talk to my Dr. about it. 15 minutes later she came back and said, she was sorry but they had tried every-thing they could but Medicare is beginning to turn many things away for seniors because of the projected Obama Care coming in. She was brushing at tears and said, "Some day they too will get old", I am so very sorry!! . YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS... At age 76 when you most need it, you arenot eligible for cancer treatment see page 272 What Nancy Pelosi didn't want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed. Remember she said, "We have to pass the Bill so that we can see what's in it." Well, here it is. Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number THE CARE BILL HB 3200 JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL. Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, TX - highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200 Please read this....... especially the reference to pages 58 & 59 JUDGE KITHIL wrote: Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally. Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts. Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN). Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?) Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees. Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age. Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception. Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years. (Death counseling..) Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order. HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on to identify: "Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. All of the above should give you the ammo you need to oppose Obamacare. Please send this information on to all of your email contacts. :Sigh...: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30968062 United States 02/11/2013 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Desert Fox User ID: 8786935 United States 02/11/2013 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
skepticnumberone User ID: 34052685 United States 02/11/2013 12:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19980561 United States 02/11/2013 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Skepticnumberone User ID: 34052685 United States 02/11/2013 12:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30968062 United States 02/11/2013 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34125775 Thailand 02/11/2013 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | While Obamacare isn't socialist medical care, as I've been explaining, it's designed to destroy the private medical insurance market and pave the way to a socialist system. See my explanation here: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] and a follow-up post here: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Everything mentioned in the OP should be recognizable as being mentioned in the two posts linked above; especially the first one. Most of it falls under the heading of destroying the private insurance system by collapsing it under the weight of government mandates and millions of new, unprofitable "customers". Also note that, with all socialist medical plans including those presently operating in Europe, the only people who can guarantee they will get quick, competent care no matter their age or fitness to work are the rich. You know, the same rich people Obama pretends to hate before attending their fundraisers? They can afford to pay for what the socialist system won't. Of course, not just any rich person need apply. You have to be one of the rich folks hand-picked by the elites, or else you will not be allowed to keep your money. Hence Obamacare's ability to raid your bank accounts, and the coming nationalization/confiscation of the private retirement care system, which I mention in the second linked post above. This is why so many rich folks, who should be the natural enemies of socialists, are lining up to kiss Obama's ass. They are jockeying to be among the ones selected by the elites not to be dispossessed of their money. Some of them want power sure, but for most, the same love of money that made them rich in the first place would drive them to prostitute themselves to the socialist elites in order to keep their money. So again, the rulers, the elites, their hand-selected toadies, and the young productive drones, will be allowed to live. The rest will be killed by incompetent practitioners, or sentenced by death panels to be given "end-of-life counseling", to distract them from the fact that they are being discarded, past their use-by date, of no utility to the state. Thanks Democrats! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 22327067 United States 02/11/2013 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
*HEISENBERG* User ID: 14560333 United States 02/11/2013 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Desert Fox User ID: 8786935 United States 02/11/2013 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
*HEISENBERG* User ID: 14560333 United States 02/11/2013 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 904314 Canada 02/11/2013 01:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As a recipient of a so called socialist medical system, that is to say, Canada's system, I can say that I would have been bankrupt many times over by all the times I've been to the doctors for whatever reason. None of that cost me a cent up front. Are there problems with this sort of system? Sure, it's not perfect. But it beats relying on a system where making money is the goal, instead of healing patients! One shouldn't be afraid of things just because someone labels them "socialist" or "communist" or whatever other "ist" you can think of. One should take the best of ALL systems to form the future system. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24521164 United States 02/11/2013 01:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14175635 United States 02/11/2013 01:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34125775 Thailand 02/11/2013 02:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As a recipient of a so called socialist medical system, that is to say, Canada's system, I can say that I would have been bankrupt many times over by all the times I've been to the doctors for whatever reason. None of that cost me a cent up front. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 904314 Can't comment on your specific case, but capitalist systems can be tweaked to cope with patients who require large amounts of care. Also, due to competition, capitalist systems drive down costs. At the end of the day, your government could have decided at any time that you weren't worth the money to fix. Under out system, the government would have been on your side if you had cover and an insurance company made the same decision. Are there problems with this sort of system? Sure, it's not perfect. But it beats relying on a system where making money is the goal, instead of healing patients! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 904314 In the capitalist system, costs are irrelevant because the hospital makes a profit on the cost. In the socialist model, costs are more important than outcomes because the system loses money every minute they have to deal with a patient. Also, in a capitalist system, increased demand doesn't result in care rationing because a capitalist system can expand to meet the demand, whereas socialist systems cannot. Thus, expanding the number of patients puts the socialist system at risk, while it makes the capitalist system flourish. Further, and this is very important, under a capitalist system, the patient is protected from the insurance company and the care giver by contract and other laws, and the government is on the consumer's side in a dispute. Under the socialist system the government is the insurance company and the caregiver, it is your adversary, and you can't sue the government. Thus, making a profit is not incompatible with healing patients. In fact, in many ways, the severe limitations of the socialist medical model make it far less compatible with curing patients than the capitalist model. One shouldn't be afraid of things just because someone labels them "socialist" or "communist" or whatever other "ist" you can think of. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 904314 Yes, some folks will be helped before the inevitable failure. No medical system could fail to help everyone. However, millions of people are put at risk when a socialist Ponzi scheme collapses. Not only do they not have the insurance they paid for, they have no money to buy medical care, because the government confiscated it to pay for the collapsed plan. A system that rewards patience, performance, efficiency, innovation, maximum access, and positive patient outcomes is a good place to start. Unfortunately, socialist systems do best when the OPPOSITE of these things occur, in order to postpone the inevitable bankruptcy. Thus, any discussion of "the best of ALL systems" necessarily LEAVES OUT most features of socialist medical systems. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30968062 United States 02/11/2013 02:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | While Obamacare isn't socialist medical care, as I've been explaining, it's designed to destroy the private medical insurance market and pave the way to a socialist system. See my explanation here: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] and a follow-up post here: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34125775 Everything mentioned in the OP should be recognizable as being mentioned in the two posts linked above; especially the first one. Most of it falls under the heading of destroying the private insurance system by collapsing it under the weight of government mandates and millions of new, unprofitable "customers". Also note that, with all socialist medical plans including those presently operating in Europe, the only people who can guarantee they will get quick, competent care no matter their age or fitness to work are the rich. You know, the same rich people Obama pretends to hate before attending their fundraisers? They can afford to pay for what the socialist system won't. Of course, not just any rich person need apply. You have to be one of the rich folks hand-picked by the elites, or else you will not be allowed to keep your money. Hence Obamacare's ability to raid your bank accounts, and the coming nationalization/confiscation of the private retirement care system, which I mention in the second linked post above. This is why so many rich folks, who should be the natural enemies of socialists, are lining up to kiss Obama's ass. They are jockeying to be among the ones selected by the elites not to be dispossessed of their money. Some of them want power sure, but for most, the same love of money that made them rich in the first place would drive them to prostitute themselves to the socialist elites in order to keep their money. So again, the rulers, the elites, their hand-selected toadies, and the young productive drones, will be allowed to live. The rest will be killed by incompetent practitioners, or sentenced by death panels to be given "end-of-life counseling", to distract them from the fact that they are being discarded, past their use-by date, of no utility to the state. Thanks Democrats! Very well said. Etta |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30968062 United States 02/11/2013 02:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 38936265 United States 04/26/2013 08:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I got this email this morning. This sucks for old people. It will more than likely end up being a nightmare for everyone at some point or another. Quoting: Etta Anybody who voted for Obama deserves the treatment, unfortunately us too who didn't vote for him. Get ready, and hide your money because Obama will have access to it. I........ Your hospital Medicare admittance has just changed under Obama Care. You must be admitted by your primary Physician in order for Medicare to pay for it! If you are admitted by an emergency room doctor it is treated as outpatient care where hospital costs are not covered. This is only the tip of the iceberg for Obama Care. Just wait to see what happen in 2013 & 2014! Age 76 Today, I went to the Dr. for my monthly B12 shot that I have been getting for a number of years. The nurse came and got me, got out the needle filled and ready to go then looked at the computer and got very quiet and asked if I was prepared to pay for it. I said no that my insurance takes care of it. She said, that Medicare had turned it down and went to talk to my Dr. about it. 15 minutes later she came back and said, she was sorry but they had tried every-thing they could but Medicare is beginning to turn many things away for seniors because of the projected Obama Care coming in. She was brushing at tears and said, "Some day they too will get old", I am so very sorry!! . YOU ARE NOT GOING TO LIKE THIS... At age 76 when you most need it, you arenot eligible for cancer treatment see page 272 What Nancy Pelosi didn't want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed. Remember she said, "We have to pass the Bill so that we can see what's in it." Well, here it is. Obama Care Highlighted by Page Number THE CARE BILL HB 3200 JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL. Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, TX - highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200 Please read this....... especially the reference to pages 58 & 59 JUDGE KITHIL wrote: Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally. Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts. Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN). Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?) Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees. Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age. Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception. Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years. (Death counseling..) Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order. HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on to identify: "Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. All of the above should give you the ammo you need to oppose Obamacare. Please send this information on to all of your email contacts. HB-3200 is not the Affordable Healthcare Act that was signed into law by the President after it was passed by the Senate and the House of Representatives. HR-3590 is the official document and all references in this are invalid. |