Sandy Hook Man of God - speaks about girl covered from head to toe in blood

Where is the photographic evidence? Was he or the parents privy to the crime photos? Why does the media hide the evidence? Is there a FCC rule that we can't see evidence?

The reporter starts the segment by saying it is an unbelievable story.......I concur.

Many of these stories we will soon realize are just that STORIES

More green screen in the first part of the video, again...

The whole thing is so fake! The entire media is nothing but a bunch of liars and tools.

look his eyes... for me he is reading...

Seriously??? Wow, that is F*d up.

First one out covered in blood from head to toe and the first thing she says is " mommy I am all right but all my friends are dead"...yeah.....let me think about that for a moment.....ahh no not buying it.

By the way when did all the parents find out from the Governor about their kids that were killed?.....Need to match that with tramatic Footage from parents ...I think I found the smoking gun

I want to know how Ms.Sotos family knew she was dead around 4pm and the other families waited all night. I read an interview with her sister in a paper in NY and it said at 11am her mother called and said their had been a shooting and Victoria didn't come out yet. She was in Vermont and made a mad dash back to conn. At around 3 30 or 4pm her sister called her and said we are leaving the firehouse. Then when she got to her home near 5 her parents told her Victoria was dead. Were they just going off assumptions or did they know for sure? I still don't understand.

Based on this video

[link to vimeo.com]

At the 3:43 mark the Soto's and the chick with the purse ( another parent that is later in this video devastated by hearing the news) seem to be finding out. That's why I want to know when they were notified. All the " casualty" families seem to be in this video acting out their grief in the same area ( I think there is camera trickery too).

How can we find out when this video was actually uploaded? This video will help with time of day.

Party pooper.

"In the 1980s, alumni of Mamou Alliance Academy in Guinea West Africa began to write letters to C&MA headquarters informing leadership of systemic child abuse that occurred at the school. Phone calls and letter writing of this nature to the C&MA continued for ten years."

( [link to en.m.wikipedia.org]

More on this here:
[link to wolfblitzzer0.blogspot.se]

"We were having A Drill”: Sandy Hook 3rd Grader Spills The Beans – From The Mouths Of Babes Comes The Truth

"We were having A Drill”: Sandy Hook 3rd Grader Spills The Beans – From The Mouths Of Babes Comes The Truth
Saturday, February 9, 2013 20:42

(Before It's News)
Is this Sandy Hook 3rd graders statement to Dr. Oz in the video below PROOF that the Sandy Hook elementary school 'shooting' was actually the BIGGEST false flag operation in the history of our country? It sure sounds to me like this little guy has spilled the beans. In my humble opinion, this is just one more piece of evidence that should lead all Americans who still have the ability to think for themselves to come to the same conclusion, we have been 'had'. Do THEY really think that they are going to be able to eliminate the 2nd Amendment after this video goes viral? Americans aren't THAT stupid! From the videographer on YouTube.:
Dr. Oz Interview of Sandy Hook Elementary student. The host discloses that the kids told him beforehand what they wanted him to ask, in order to avoid traumatic questioning and - I would surmise - would permit the kids to be thoroughly prepared and confident of their answer. Sounds as if he tells him they were having a DRILL. You be the judge.

More at [link to www.scribd.com] and [link to www.scribd.com]

One very recent comment from the video on YouTube:
Wow. If you watch carefully, you will see that after the kid says "When we were having a drill, we were hiding under, like...," his mother (the woman sitting next to him in the black sweater) nudges him with her arm, his body moves slightly in response, and his eyes quickly dart towards her, then back again. Then, Dr. Oz immediately taps him on the shoulder and quickly changes the subject, so the kid doesn't say anything more about it being a drill. From the mouths of babes comes the truth.
Published on Feb 4, 2013

this

I don't see this as green screen

At 4:40 it looks like that Soto brother peaking around the corner of the building looking directly at the camera

Exactly!!!!

So how do we find out when it was uploaded?

a pastor or preacher is a liar by definition

a pastor lies for jews, a pastor is a proxy rabbi

Covered from head to toe in blood and the media passed on that picture?

THAT is unbelievable.

You both are seeing what you WANT to see. I can clearly see that he is NOT reading off a card or monitor--but since YOU think he is--it is supposed to be true right? LOL. BTW--oops no green screen either...

That is a perception some of you may have--OR another perception is--the kid was nervous--remember he is 6-7 yrs old! And was searching for the words. Dr Oz was smart--when he so the kid struggling--breathing heavy--mind probably racing--Oz--changed gears---something CHILD ADVOCATES do!!
wow--the spin some of you put on things is hilarious at times.

Yes, the lighting is off for what is supposedly being presented.

There is definitely something strange about the lighting.

You have NO idea what bldg they were in--if it was a city bldg--could have had high ceilings--you dont know what type of camera they were using --plus remember when tv crews do close up interviews--moast things in the background will have a different light---Lost out on this 1--find something with some concrete proof.

Ya got nothing here--why is he a joker when you know NOTHING about him--and your judgements are based upon your PERECEPTIONS of him--wow...talk about discrimination...

i dont say about green screen...

i just say, look at 0:25 (pause the video)
and ask you why he is looking to the right of the blonde girl?

it's not a proof, it's just suspicious.

specially if when the cops say later they found the girl in the classroom, and she never runned out herself alone.

[link to www.nytimes.com]

Does the shill union pay you extra when spewing out more than one dis-information lie in one post?

.

Officer Penna, who was the first officer to enter the second room, found a girl standing alone amid the bodies. She appeared to be in shock, and was covered in blood, but had not been injured. He, not knowing the gunman had been found, told her to stay put.

He ran into the next classroom and saw the dead gunman, with Officers Chapman and Smith standing nearby. State troopers and other officers were now flooding in. Officer Penna returned to the second classroom, his rifle slung around his chest, grabbed the uninjured girl by the arm and ran with her out to a triage area set up in the parking lot.

[link to www.nytimes.com]

Hard to reconcile the two stories. I didn't ever see any sign of any triage area in the parking lot from any of the helicopter footage.

Good call NAM.

There was a triage set up by the fire truck but I don't think they had it set during the live shooting. Yes many stories that don't pan out. That's fine because stories get embellished but since the New town Bee had a reporter on scene you would think she got this photo....or at least of the triage area during evacuation....

yes..there is one, the red and yellow place near firetruck
at 0:33 on [link to www.youtube.com]

but i think a bloody little girl in shock was drive to hospital... difficult to run in mother arms

[link to www.newhope-cc.com]

Whatever you do, be sure, in your in-depth investigation and consideration, be extra sure not to ask him...