The problem is your doing calculations that nasa has given the figures for. None of us beleive anything coming out of nasa. Besides.. The accuracy and predictive nature of certain remote.viewers have a better track record than you.. And they seem.to think some causes a coastal event ..possibly from a rock hitting the pacific anytime.bewteen now and june.
Your just another paid shill who jas infiltrated this forum and need to steer way clear of anything revolving around space here.. We simply dont beleive in nasa and this shit from them that you parrot back to us in every damn thread relating to asteroids or.comets..
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31754688 Other than the fact that NASA isn't providing the data from which the orbit is found you may want to also re-evaluate your opinion of NASA:
Track records on celestial doom:
NASA/scientists/rationalists - 100%
kooks/crackpots/trolls/scammers - 0%
I'd say that relying on NASA/scientist data is infinitely better than relying on Rubetube psychotic morans for information.
My cat has a better track record than the "out-of-the-box-thinkers".
PlanetX/Nibiru/Wormywood, etc.
Elenin
Tu24
any asteroid
any comet & its "debris trail"
any solar flare or CME
etc.
... all have been big fails for the woowoos.
0% accuracy for their psychotic predictions.
Who to believe?
100% correct or 0% correct?
That's a tough one.
