Does anybody else think Obama's SOU speech is full shit?

The comments regarding the personnel attacks on the POTUS, or defense of him, serve to point out that you fuckers can't relate to the seriousness of the State Of the Union address or its implications. That was the OP question, FOS or brilliant statesmanship.

Yes we are increasing taxes,on somebody , but not the working class. The wealthy will pay more of there fair share. We will continue to give away the tax money you do pay, to millions who are on the federal "payroll" and vote for me, but it will make you stronger. We are going to spend billions and billions more the same way we did that got us in this economic mess to start with,it will help us to have a healthy economy. And most of you have no clue where this is going to lead us because you can't think. Your education system has failed to provide you with a clear sense of history and economics. Maybe you all had better start to learn to love Cokskn so you won't fucking starve to death when the economy crashes out for real.

hot air rises, cold air falls

his ceiling is endless...

Auslander Raus!

In the government's bizzaro reasoning, fast food jobs were placed under the manufacturing category.

You proceed from a false assumption:

That the President of the United States has real power to change any of the things you have listed.

comparing democrats and republicans is like comparing a blue mustang to a red mustang. its pretty much the same thing, on the outside they look different but under the hood(behind closed doors) they are exactly the same. all they care about is money and control. thats it nothing more, nothing less. enough of blaming one side or the other. the same scumbags stay in power and no one does anything about it. we have seen this same back n forth arguing for decades.

full of shit factor extreme boots alert

He wants to reduce our nuke capabilities to less than the Russians. He wants to confiscate civilian guns, which Russia and China want also.
He told Medvedev that he (Obama) would have more flexibility after the election, and they could get it done then - paraphrased as close as I recall it.

Troops are training with cops and military hardware over major poplation centers.
They want to steal the retirement plans, telling us it's better for us.
The DHS and IRS are now heavily armed and running rogue.
The potential new CIA director has been running a shadow war for Obama in Africa, bypassing Congress and the Pentagon.
All who live within 100 miles of a coastline or border no longer live in places where their Constitutional rights are protected. It's called Constitution Free zones. In my opinion, if that is their thinking, those who are no longer protected by the Constitution and our government are no longer required to pay taxes to support it, or abide by any of it's unConstitutional mandates.

I see a pattern here. I hope eveyone else does too.

What time is your paid shift over?

FOS!!!!

who cares about the nukes, we have about 5000 of them. more than enough to destroy the world multiple times. nuke thing is a waste of time but everything else you said is on the money

nothing, there is no "conspiracy" here, go back to sleep slave!

The economy is better you say well please back up your words if you peruse the daily job cuts website you will gain a better picture of our dismal economy. The obamacare fiasco has pumped billions of dollars from everyone who has been forced to pay social security from Medicaid into obamacare which if you cannot afford to pay into this ponsi scheme means you are hosed.

If you go beyond the metered obamacare then your retirement accounts along with savings, checking and any precious metals can and will be confiscated. Just do some research into medical facilities that used to care for the poor, indigent, and note they re going out of business thanks to that damn communist obama.

Daily Job Cuts
[link to www.dailyjobcuts.com]

Yes you are right. Congress is responsible for most of our problems, both Dems and repubs. The SOTU is suppose to be just that. Instead it is a podium for rhetoric setting the stage for all those who are standing and applauding to vote their party line. And who is the Party head. And again the message is that the answer to the problems we created is to use the same stratagy, tax and spend. Or should be Tax, borrow and write a bad check. And I have to have a Neder point that out. How much foreign aid have they received since 1945?

As always, his speech was full of empty promises.

Obamabots from 'other countries'

i could of sworn i was watching a replay of the last SOU.

empty promises, proposals, statistics full of shit, lies and a little sprinkle of sugar on top.

Trying to lay the carpet for the new Carbon Tax, and impending Cap and Trade doom he fully expects to implement (likely by executive order).

So, by now, I think anyone with even 1/4 of a brain should be able to see the damage this man has done and plans to do (on steroids) over the next four years. We also all plainly see through his lies as evidenced by the bing responses. So, tell me, if even his Democrat base reflected an apparently quite negative rating throughout the entire speech (on what was likely a biased poll), why in the fuck are we still watching him? How precisely did he get elected?

Better yet, WHY in the hell hasn't this Congress begun impeachment proceedings in light of his (and his cohort's) clearly negligent (and possibly criminal) actions with regard to so many national security issues, I can't begin to list them all here?...

I'm tired of this shit...

Last Edited by SaveUSa on 02/12/2013 11:59 PM

now is not the time to stop spending money..............



what a fracking moron.

Definition of Chief Executive Officer - CEO

The highest ranking executive in a company whose main responsibilities include developing and implementing high-level strategies, making major corporate decisions, managing the overall operations and resources of a company, and acting as the main point of communication between the board of directors and the corporate operations. The CEO will often have a position on the board, and in some cases is even the chair...

Congress won't do shit, any attempt to remove black jesus and there would be race riots!!!

The republicans have shown their cards and they are just another name that means the same thing as Democrat.

They are attacking the Tea Party and libertarians who GAVE them the majority in the house, what a bunch of morons! Time for a third party, or just kill off the republicans because they are absolutely spineless cowards who think Mitt Romney is a good choice for presidential nominee!

You're kidding,right???

They would be very short lived, and most true Americans wouldn't participate regardless of color; however, we would all likely do whatever was necessary to "minimize the impact," which is also why they would be short lived.

Congress members that clearly see what's happening, and I know that all do by now, truly need to stand with us and make their voices heard (regardless of how successful they might be, or for fear of possibly losing their jobs). Those that do, millions will stand behind them. Those that don't, however, will be held equally accountable in the end (regardless of party), and when or if that happens...only God can know the outcome.

Last Edited by SaveUSa on 02/13/2013 12:23 AM

I don't. I think a lot of his proposals will help the economy. If it was Romney in office and he gave the same speech, would you all think he was full of shit? I don't care who gave the speech. Lets see if anything gets done.

It was nonsense for idiots...

was a great speech...
thank you Obama:)

now lets see some action:)


thank you God,

Thank YOU

"The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

But I do ask every publisher, every editor, and every newsman in the nation to reexamine his own standards, and to recognize the nature of our country's peril. In time of war, the government and the press have customarily joined in an effort based largely on self-discipline, to prevent unauthorized disclosures to the enemy. In time of "clear and present danger," the courts have held that even the privileged rights of the First Amendment must yield to the public's need for national security.

...

For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match.

...

The newspapers which printed these stories were loyal, patriotic, responsible and well-meaning. Had we been engaged in open warfare, they undoubtedly would not have published such items. But in the absence of open warfare, they recognized only the tests of journalism and not the tests of national security. And my question tonight is whether additional tests should not now be adopted.

The question is for you alone to answer. No public official should answer it for you. No governmental plan should impose its restraints against your will. But I would be failing in my duty to the nation, in considering all of the responsibilities that we now bear and all of the means at hand to meet those responsibilities, if I did not commend this problem to your attention, and urge its thoughtful consideration.

...

No President should fear public scrutiny of his program. For from that scrutiny comes understanding; and from that understanding comes support or opposition. And both are necessary. I am not asking your newspapers to support the Administration, but I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. For I have complete confidence in the response and dedication of our citizens whenever they are fully informed.

I not only could not stifle controversy among your readers--I welcome it. This Administration intends to be candid about its errors; for as a wise man once said: "An error does not become a mistake until you refuse to correct it." We intend to accept full responsibility for our errors; and we expect you to point them out when we miss them.

Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed--and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy. And that is why our press was protected by the First Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution- -not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and the sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold, educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

This means greater coverage and analysis of international news--for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security--and we intend to do it.

...

And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of man's deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news--that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent."

-John Fitzgerald Kennedy

This website certainly qualifies as news delivery, you should take care in your words in any attempt to stifle decent and give threats of national matters that don't concern you.

Respectfully..

Look you until now to find out that the SOU speech is BS? Remember the one Bush gave? LOL hahahahah