Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,305 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 934,039
Pageviews Today: 1,194,705Threads Today: 302Posts Today: 5,214
10:11 AM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Message Subject Sovereign citizens: Is this an accurate portrayal?
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
I believe that Obamacare only applies to US citizens and that's specifically written in the law. That means that non-resident aliens (including Sovereigns) are exempt from Obamacare.

Does anyone know the answer?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33610307

Thread: Pay No Taxes legally -End the FED -synopsis page 8-Why are waiting for someone to do it for us like Ron paul

I know the answer, but I am not going to give it to you, figure it out for yourself, that is part of the problem, you are not willing to put in your own work and even read the thread I have posted with the answers.

Sovereign means "self-ruling" asking someone else for answers you can find yourself (I have shown you where to look) is the mindset and heart of one who needs to be governed, not a self ruling man or woman.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 31297288

I wasn't asking you specifically.

As a matter of fact, I was hoping that this issue would help lead to clarification for others.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33610307

The thread I linked with lead to clarification, why are you still asking when you have not read that thread?

I will put it simply for you, if you are NOT demanding lawful money as provided for in law (yes, even in Canada) you ARE subject to the commercial US or Canadian bankruptcy and all of its entrapment's of "commerce".

That is why ALL the Sovereign Citizen (including teamlaw) falls flat on its face in a commercial court, their money, their commercial courts.

There is your answer, if you do not want to know more, do not read this thread:

Thread: Pay No Taxes legally -End the FED -synopsis page 8-Why are waiting for someone to do it for us like Ron paul
Please verify you're human:

Reason for copyright violation: