Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,217 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,721,283
Pageviews Today: 2,207,033Threads Today: 523Posts Today: 8,448
03:15 PM

Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
Message Subject Sovereign citizens: Is this an accurate portrayal?
Poster Handle J
Post Content
If the owner of the Lawful money (the US Treasury) does not GIVE me lawful money via my demand, they are obligated to pay any fees or perform any duties associated with my now FORCED use of said property.

First, FRNs are lawful money. Nixing your entire argument.

Second, who says that the Federal Reserve is 'obligated to pay any fees or perform any duties associated with my now FORCED use of said property.'

Smiling.....you citing yourselfr again?

Do you really believe that your pseudo-legal gibberish obligates the Federal Reserve (or anyone else) to do *anything*?

Sigh...you poor, silly bastards. You really don't get it, do you? You, citing you, isn't the law. Nor does it create any obligation, establish any loophole, create any limit, define any term, establish any jurisdiction.

That you believe it does is adorable. And has kept me smiling for days.
 Quoting: J 34311994

Are you saying I didn't cite Milan v. The US? That I didn't cite US v. Rickman? Remember, just because you *ignore* a citation doesn't mean it didn't happen.

I've cited both cases *at least* 3 times each in this thread alone. Yet you ignored *every* citation. And then, as you sovereign citizen types are wont to do, you insisted that because you ignore something, it doesn't exist.

Sigh...if only reality worked that way. Try again, this time reading for comprehension.
Please verify you're human:

Reason for reporting: