Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,579 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,030,415
Pageviews Today: 1,336,086Threads Today: 195Posts Today: 4,625
10:29 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016

 
snake.plissken
Offer Upgrade
call me snake...

User ID: 18821294
United States
02/14/2013 03:50 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
Hillary WILL run in 2016, claims wealthy Greek donor (who says Bill told him)

13 February 2013

A wealthy Democratic donor is fanning the flames of speculation that Hillary Clinton is indeed running for president.
Sacramento developer Angelo Tsakopoulos says Bill Clinton has confirmed the presumed plan that the former Secretary of State will make a bid for the White House again.
The millionaire told the Greek Reporter that Clinton's husband revealed his wife's political ambition, as the power couple gear up for a 2016 race.

Read more here: [link to www.dailymail.co.uk]


FFS... The Mother of all Nightmares.


snake
snake.plissken (OP)
call me snake...

User ID: 18821294
United States
02/14/2013 03:52 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
during her 2007 run, this piece:

Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has unveiled her economic vision. Should she be given the power to implement it, we can say goodbye to the prosperity and opportunity we have enjoyed since the Reagan years.

In a speech at Manchester School of Technology in New Hampshire, Clinton said it's time to replace President Bush's "ownership society," which she called an "on your own" society, with one based on shared responsibility and prosperity.

Clinton said she prefers a "we're all in it together" society: "I believe our government can once again work for all Americans. It can promote the great American tradition of opportunity for all and special privileges for none."

Doesn't such a society already exist elsewhere? It's called socialism, where government has sought to make all things economically equal and the only equality is that all are equally poor. Wasn't defeating such a society precisely why we fought and won the Cold War? Why does Senator Clinton wish to embrace the principles of the losing side?

Clinton has merely updated the old and discredited (except among socialist dictators) Karl Marx saying: "From each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

Clinton's remarks came before students at a school whose purpose is to train high school kids for careers in the construction, automotive, graphic arts and other industries. She told them, "We have sent a message to our young people that if you don't go to college . . . that you're thought less of in America. We have to stop this."

Her assertion is bunk, but it is the typical class warfare bunk that comes from rich white liberals who want to take money from one group of people and give to others who didn't earn it in hopes they will become loyal Democratic voters.

This is not the philosophy that made America what it is. This is not a land of equal outcome, but of equal opportunity commensurate with one's talents, interests and drive.

In his "The Wealth of Nations," Adam Smith wrote: "It is the highest impertinence and presumption, therefore, in kings and ministers, to pretend to watch over the economy of private people, and to restrain their expense. . . . (Kings and ministers) are themselves always, and without any exception, the greatest spendthrifts in the society. Let them look well after their own expense, and they may safely trust private people with theirs. If their own extravagance does not ruin the state, that of their subjects never will."

I am not robbed by people who have more money than me. I am robbed by a government that wants to penalize my industry and give increasing portions of what I earn to people who do not emulate my principles, morals and ethics.

What have we come to? We once taught our young people the virtues of hard work, saving, personal responsibility and accountability for one's actions, chastity before and fidelity and commitment in marriage, honesty, integrity and virtue - not to mention the Ten Commandments (especially the one about not coveting that which belongs to your neighbor). We now teach them entitlement, victimhood, class envy and rights to other people's money. When one robs a bank, it's a crime. When government takes our money, it's called a tax. Same result.

read the rest, here: [link to townhall.com]
calx
Bartle doo?

User ID: 27504938
United States
02/14/2013 03:54 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
hitlery clinton is a stupid hee ho.
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

Watch "The Money Masters" and read "The Creature From Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin to unveil the true enemy.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19980561
United States
02/14/2013 03:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
I Don't think we'll see a Dem in 16. By then the economy will be toast & everyone will be pissed at them. The Pendulum will swing back to the Repubs.

Chris Christie....Watch.

:way...:
snake.plissken (OP)
call me snake...

User ID: 18821294
United States
02/14/2013 04:11 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
if this comes to pass, NWO implementation will be complete.

Hillary will make Obama look like a neocon and her Amerika will be One most of us won't want any part of...



snake
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34378238
Canada
02/14/2013 04:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
Hillary Clinton is all done now. She's politically dead as Dillinger. You won't see her again.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2599010
United States
02/14/2013 04:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
you'd be surprised at how many leftists can't wait for her to run:

Poll: Hillary Clinton the most popular political figure in the country

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is the most popular national political figure in the country, according to a new Quinnipiac University poll released Friday.

Clinton’s approval rating outpaces President Obama — who defeated the former first lady in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary — and other potential rivals for the presidency, should she run again in 2016.

According to Quinnipiac’s poll, 61 percent of American voters view Clinton favorably while just 34 percent had an unfavorable view of the former senator. Obama, fresh off his reelection, has a 51 percent favorable to 46 percent unfavorable rating.

[link to dailycaller.com]

--- --- ---

Chappaqua Is Ready For President Hillary Clinton

The small Hudson Valley town that learned to love living with the former first family doesn't want Hillary going anywhere but the White House. “The town is on board,” says Greenberg.


[link to www.buzzfeed.com]

--- --- ---

Sickening.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34378238
Canada
02/14/2013 04:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
Hillary has 2 things going against her:

#1 - Once you lose the party nomination once in any kind of a close race, you never get it at a later time. If you get blown out of the fucking water early you have a chance 4 years later, not how Hillary lost it. That's why candidates drop out early, as soon as it's apparent they can't win. that's why Hillary took the Sec. Of State job. Once you're SOS, that's the last stop in your political career. After losing to Obama in that tight one she knew it was all over. That was the highest job she was ever going to get so she took it.

#2 - No Secretary of State who leaves office before the president ever comes back in any official capacity. They may retire to the backrooms and become king makers and tree shakers, but they never serve in any office again.

Hillary is fucking gone, forget about her.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 33550149
02/14/2013 04:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
hiding
snake.plissken (OP)
call me snake...

User ID: 18821294
United States
02/14/2013 04:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Socialists Villages Raising our Children? if Hillary gets to be Obama's successor in 2016
Hillary has 2 things going against her:

#1 - Once you lose the party nomination once in any kind of a close race, you never get it at a later time. If you get blown out of the fucking water early you have a chance 4 years later, not how Hillary lost it. That's why candidates drop out early, as soon as it's apparent they can't win. that's why Hillary took the Sec. Of State job. Once you're SOS, that's the last stop in your political career. After losing to Obama in that tight one she knew it was all over. That was the highest job she was ever going to get so she took it.

#2 - No Secretary of State who leaves office before the president ever comes back in any official capacity. They may retire to the backrooms and become king makers and tree shakers, but they never serve in any office again.

Hillary is fucking gone, forget about her.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34378238


man i hope you're right...

alas, something tells me you're not.


snake

News