WA state bill to ban automatic weapons sales. Sheriffs to inspect homes yearly.

The state is schizophrenic -- east side is consevative and west side is ultra liberal. What is there to understand?

Seattle has a large statue of Trotsky on the street in the Fremont district and the U of W calls its large quadrangle Red Square. Of course things like this bill will be born there. The other side of the state is more like Idaho. So there you have it! :-)

The state is schizophrenic -- east side is consevative and west side is ultra liberal. What is there to understand?

Seattle has a large statue of Trotsky on the street in the Fremont district and the U of W calls its large quadrangle Red Square. Of course things like this bill will be born there. The other side of the state is more like Idaho. So there you have it! :-)

monkey see, monkey do.

if this trend continues it could fracture the nation,not like it need much help but just a little nudge and .......

Born and bred in Wa state,no way that Bill passes,it is most likely DOA,close but not enough Lefty Freaks from Cali yet here.

Plenty of lefty freaks here. Seattle? Olympia? They are everywhere. It has a chance to pass.

And IF you get them, you consent to having the sheriff's office drop by to ensure that you still have them and that they're stored away "safely".

Peace.

It will start with Sherrifs and end with the Foreign troops.. Sorry pal, but you're not match for that.

That suck ass Ed Murray needs to realize the 2nd amendment is not something you can discard like yesterdays trash.I live in Washington and if that puke Murray wants to ban guns in Seattle then go ahead,but most of Washington is rural and we dont need this shit shoved down our throats! If it`s passed I fucking promise not only wont i comply but i`ll start stockpiling.

Not enough sheriffs... and certainly, not enough stupid ones.

all I thought of was this..

Title says it all. Of particular interest is the provision to ENFORCE INSPECTIONS:

"In order to continue to possess a so-called assault weapon that was owned before the assumed passing of the legislation, the person must "safely and securely" store the assault weapon and allow the sheriff of the county to, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to "ensure compliance," despite some apparent civil liberties implications related to the Fourth Amendment."

[link to www.examiner.com]

Peace.

maybe Katrina was a dry run for the future..

there you go

during the time when people needed them most they were taken away from everyone

I LIVE IN WASHINGTON,and i never heard shit about this!This is BULLSHIT! That slime governor was voted in by less than 300 votes state wide and he`s gonna slam this shit down our throats?

isnt it all hippies in Washington state?

Our Rights,given by God and Guaranteed by the Constitution are not Negotiable,period.
Any attempt to abrogate those Rights is a Felony and possibly Treason,a Capital offence.
The case law supporting this,is substantial.

Where rights are secured by the Constitution are involved, there CAN BE NO LEFISLATION WHICH WOULD ABOLISH THEM.
Miranda vs Arizona.
The Court is to protect against any encroachment of Constitutionally secured rights. Boyd vs U.S.

An unconstitutional act is not a law,it confers no rights; it imposes no duties;affords no protection;it creates no office;it is in legal contemplation as though it had never been passed, Norton vs Shelby county.
These rulings apply to every right set forth in the Constitution, not some of them,all of them.
Do not negotiate with terrorists.

And of what consequence would that be?

Have you not learned over the last couple of days that a large majority of not only GLP but of the populous as a whole believe that you only need accusations and a cleverly crafted media barrage - then all of a sudden you have no more protection under the US Constitution?

This country has become so divided, and it becomes more and more evident each day that the people you THINK are in your camp will uproot and leave just as soon as things get a bit uncomfortable.

Just as shocking are those that scream "my rights!!!", but have little idea what is actually entailed between the 1st and 10th Amendments, nor their applications and provisions within, and the position(s) taken that someone with whom you may disagree no longer "deserves" the aforementioned applications, provisions, or protections.

Do only a few see that "they" are pushing ALL of this garbage now simply because "they" know of the division among the people fostered in hate and lack of knowledge, and are using this hatred-driven division to "their" advantage?