Sandy Hook. Vice Principal was the other adult survivor wounded so who was she ?

Her name is Natalie Hammond. Recent attendee at the State of The Union address. She was named "lead teacher" and I guess others have referred to her as the vice principal.

I checked into this. Looks like Ms. Mazzariello volunteered to return from retirement to help out, that was nice of her.

[link to newtownbee.com]

Still the mystery of the second adult victim survivor remains. Is anybody else curious? In the articles and in Wikipedia there are no names?

They did not have a vice principal before ?

mmm difficult to say...

on this article:
[link to www.newstimes.com]

"Hammond, the recently promoted lead teacher at the school, is one of two wounded survivors of the nightmare that befell Sandy Hook on Friday.
...
Lanza's burst of fire killed Hochsprung and Sherlach. Hammond was shot in the foot, leg and hand, but managed to crawl to safety behind a door. "

and this one:
[link to www.usatoday.com]

"Sandy Hook's lead teacher pressed her body against the meeting room's door, which did not have a lock, Day said. The gunman shot through the door, wounding the unidentified teacher in an arm and a leg."


so we see how it's easy to make the confusion.

nobody invited the second wounded adult surviving victim to the state of the union address?

[link to newtownbee.com]

only Natalie Hammond... i see


the other teacher is Kaitlin Roig (not wounded)

I think they muddled their lines on this part of the script, they told everyone that Dunbury Hospital received 2 children and one wounded adult, but the scanner recordings also show one wounded being taken to a private hospital.

So, after days of telling us that there was only one wounded adult survivor they changed it to two. If this were a real shooting it is unfathomable that they would get the number of wounded wrong, especially when there is only two.

But the astute media just reports that there are now two wounded without questioning why the story has changed days after the event.

So now they have to come up with a name and a story for this person, or perhaps they don't, after all, the media aren't questioning the discrepancies and nobody cares what the "conspiracy nutters" think, so it may never be explained who this person supposedly is.

It really is sickening how easy it is for them to lie and change their story without having to explain anything.