Evolution was not proven true...until THIS.......I am SUCH the believer now- and you??

Sorry, but the "god of the gaps" argument doesn't apply here. We basically know how these systems work. But complex systems have never been observed to magically form without intelligence and design. The burden of proof is on the evolutionists to explain step by step how these systems came about unintelligently. Otherwise it's not science, but science fiction. Science is supposed to be based on hard evidence, not faith in the impossible.

Last Edited by Gimme Some Truth on 02/17/2013 02:53 AM

We don't know how it happened therefore god! And proof.

:ohserious :

I think it's more like this-
If it can't be explained?
""We "know" there is no God, so quick!! Let's start spewing insults at believers and then we can feel smart again!""

I never saw with my own eyes how the Mona Lisa was produced. I'm going to guess it was done over many years by monkeys randomly throwing paint at a canvas. Some people claim it was painted by an intelligent designer, but that's not scientific is it? That would be like saying God did it.

I have never said there is no god......ever.....so fuck off dickhead.


There is no proof there is no god either.....but unlike you i'm open to concepts without just believing blindly because someone told me or it was written in a book.

You didn't see "with your own eyes" yourself being born but you were weren't you?
It's clear that you and your ilk, armed only with your simian brains cannot (or more likely will not) comprehend the vast time scales involved in evolution and the almost infinite combinations involved in producing what and where we are.

Until you can grasp this very basic tenet I'm afraid you will evolve no more.

See, that's really presumptuous on your part. You don't know anything about me, really. Anyone's much more likely to have had someone tell them all about "evolution" and to have read about that in a book, than to have been taught about or to have read that other book you refer to.
you're "courageously" fighting an army of straw men.

I'll try to make this simple for you since you didn't understand my analogy.

How much time would it take for the ocean waves to produce a sand castle? I'll give you a billion years, but we all know there would be no sand castle.

If the odds are zero, a billion times zero is still zero.

Large amounts of time don't make the impossible possible.

Last Edited by Gimme Some Truth on 02/17/2013 03:24 AM

Pictured below: God

so anyone who believes in gad and evolution, could not possibly be worshipping the "right" god.

and catholics, because they don't worship along your guidelines, they of course could not be praying to the "real" god.

oh and new agers and spiritualistss and free thinkers- all with a different concept of what god can be. all different from who YOU say he is are of course idol worshipers.

i think god might be surprised to discover the limitations you have placed upon him , in how he can act, what he should do, and who he might bless.

Science is the pursuit of fact and truth. In the eyes of science, nothing is concrete until proven as such. Evolution is a theory. There is plenty of evidence for evolution, one need only look to the flu virus to see survival of the fittest and genetic evolution to ensure the continuation of the species.

Religion postulates that there's no reason to look for fact and truth because said fact and truth is already known to those who believe. Evidence is unnecessary because a collection of books, written hundreds of years apart in many cases, were assembled together by the vote of man and there is certainly no way that that could be fallable.

And with that post you have proved that evolution is beyond your comprehension.

Atheists like to use the 'god of the gaps' argument against creationists. But then they argue that huge amounts of time can make anything possible.

Huge amounts of time is their "god of the gaps". They can't explain how it happened, but throw enough time at it and voila it happened!

You're not good with metaphors are you?

and this is supposed to convince me that evolution is impossible?

Look, creationists have to try to simplify evolution to even begin to understand it. It becomes clear even after one or two sentences though that they never will be able to though. It's beyond their capabilities. Just accept it.

However, going back to your ridiculously over-simplified and frankly pointless analogy...

For there to be water there needs to be a base for the water to reside upon.
Waves indicate movement of water.
Movement of water against a base creates friction.
Friction causes erosion.

What creates sand?
Erosion of water on rocks.
What facilitates water erosion of rock?
Waves.

Even though there's still some way to producing a version of a sand castle the basic building blocks are there.
Do you still follow?

Now obviously there isn't a NEED for there to be a sandcastle so the likelihood of one being made is slim but if there was a need then the likelihood of a sand castle would increase exponentially.


Feel free to throw apple against pear comparisons at me though.
Whatever your atretic mind feels comfortable with.

Did not bothered to read all the comments.

Evolution, until missing link is found (wasn't found in 200+ years of archeology, biology studies, ettc), is nothing but a theory or a hoax.

Considering that EVERY "democratic", fascist and communist regime in the last 150 years (like all the countries , maybe except Iran) did EVERYTHING possible to either destroy or minimize the religions , or even laugh at the believers, without any solid proof, I think that THEY are afraid of religious people.

Religious people (excluding habotnics) are THINKERS.They do not want people to think.


As a believer (not habotnic, last time I was in a church was at my brother wedding last year, and before that like 10 years earlier I went once) and a man that doesn't accept the NUMBER of the evidences, I HAVE TO look deep in everything that is considered 100% true.


After 40 years of life, and experiences that will fill 1,000+ pages of non-boredom (from my life in communism, the many tries to go over the border, the years working in foreign coutries, military, etc), I had not found a SOLID evidence that there is an evolution whatsoever.

NOBODY had been able to create LIFE, and EVERY SINGLE lab experiment wansn't even able to make a cell multiply itself.

As for now, there is no proof that frogs evolved into lizards.The "scientists", based on the fake Darwin theories, only ASSUMED that some species evolved from the others.There are even "proofs" of that evolution.


But when comes to HUMANS, the "scientists" are unable to prove HOW the man evolved from a a primate.THERE IS NO LINK BETWEEN THE TWWO SPECIES !!!!

idiot.You will soon learn fool.

alright dgn, you strike me as a reasonable fellow, let us suppose that creationism were taught right there in school, right there next to evolution as a plausible alternative.

how long do you guess it would be before the creationists began demanding that origin of species be banned from the library? that teachers with lesson plans including darwinism be charged as criminals?

how long before bonfires with science books in the public square?

a man as intelligent as you must admit that this has already happened in our nations history.

is it any wonder so many look suspiciously at creationists?

Agnostics = coward athiests
Athiests = lying tongue if not the dumbest

Both = going to Eternal Damnation of Hell unless they repent and bow down to the King of Kings The One and Only God Jesus Christ.

like you came from rocks who supposedly rained billions of fairy tale lala land ago.

You really need to revisit your marketing strategies for this god thing.
Threats tend not to do it for people you know.

And the "You dumb creationist and we smart evolutionists" argument goes on and on, actually it's the other way around.

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.. - Romans 1:22

your assertion that some are afraid of religious people is right on. not in the sense that scientific theories will be disproved. theories arise, some fall some stand. most scientists accept that that is the way of it

it's just that the smell of burning books from the library of alexandria is still fresh in their noses.

Who's threatening? Me, oh no no.. It was not a threat when God rained fire and brimstone in sodom, it was reality.

Try to check your brain dude.

here,dgn , my friend, allow me to offer the above, by the learned ac as exhibit A

come now.....he sound perfectly sane and rational to me....perfectly balanced (the sarcasm is free):-)

It was as real as Never-Never Land in Peter Pan.

My brain's fine thanks, yours needs a lot of work on it.

There is a very thin lining of tissue that surrounds the ribs, kind of like a very thin clear sheaf covering a knife blade. If the rib is removed from that sheath, without damaging the sheath, the body will grow a new rib inside the sheath. No other bone in the human body can do this.

Read more: [link to creationrevolution.com]

Wow, just think, 4500 hundred years ago, this was written, who knew this to be true back then but the Creator God?

Rejection of God is rejection of knowledge, so... just keep making things up along the way to death. Oh wait, no one really dies, they just ascend, it has been proven by some scientist that used his imagination to picture his world without a Creator God. The line is drawn. Who will you believe, mere anti-god men, or a Creator God that has shown us these things in all of His Creation.

christians make me want to cry from their amazing amount of stupidity.