| Users Online Now: 1,990 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 888,983 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,212,281 | Threads Today: 339 | Posts Today: 5,460 |
| 10:15 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,990 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 888,983 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,212,281 | Threads Today: 339 | Posts Today: 5,460 |
| 10:15 AM | ||
30 Second Update - Russian Meteor Shot Down:CONFIRMED? | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26795689  United States02/16/2013 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That question would be irrelevant if this talk of it not being a meteor at all keeps coming up. [link to www.youtube.com] Quoting: TryToGetTheTruth It's difficult to accept his allegation at face value when he also claims this: "When something falls - it's man made. People are warmongerers and provocateurs." Is he really implying that there can be no space-based objects that fall in our atmosphere and impact the Earth's surface???  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 26050784 United States02/16/2013 08:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Everyone's analysis is banal and wrong headed. What you have to realize is that "time" itself is fragmenting. When you realize this, it will all make sense. That "missile" that struck the meteor wasn't a missile, it actually was a part of the meteor breaking off, but in reverse time. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 08:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33171143 United States02/16/2013 08:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Railguns are not heat seeking. They calculate the speed and the trajectory and lead the target to hit it. They can bring missiles out of the sky with a Rail Gun. The same principle here, the meteor was coming in at a known angle and speed. The question is how do you calculate the precice trajectory of an object that is burning up as it enters the atmosphere and thus changing shape, size, composition as it descends? If the descending object does not maintain a consistent form, how can it's trajectory & velocity be precisely measured to the extent that it could be obliterated from a ground-based weapons system firing a projectile from a remote location? That question would be irrelevant if this talk of it not being a meteor at all keeps coming up. [link to www.youtube.com] hence why it was only shot down in the last moments. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 09:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Its harder to see in this video but if you look to the right of the meteor you can see the railgun projectile after it hits the object. Then it disintegrates. [link to www.youtube.com] |
MHz  User ID: 34243878  Canada02/16/2013 09:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| my2centsworth User ID: 5382682 Canada02/16/2013 09:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 09:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is another view where you can see the meteor being shot by the Kinetic Railgun Projectile. its hit 11 seconds in [link to www.youtube.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 32547856 United States02/16/2013 09:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 28625274  Thailand02/16/2013 09:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34471935  Germany02/16/2013 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here is another view where you can see the meteor being shot by the Kinetic Railgun Projectile. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 15740069 its hit 11 seconds in [link to www.youtube.com] Awesome, you can even see it getting slower in the later slowdown. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22444487 United States02/16/2013 09:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Different angles at 3 seconds is the explosion at 34 seconds is the double trail and you can see how it fades out yet another angle lower your speakers on this one.. unless your showing it to someone another explosion compilation at 45 seconds the camera stopped working So after watching that... yes something hit it and hit it hard...     |
| Meaty Youre User ID: 34464973 United States02/16/2013 09:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 20756371  United Kingdom02/16/2013 09:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks like that "missile" came from behind. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32004531 I had no idea we have missiles that can travel at 20,000 miles and hour inside of our atmosphere....  They have shit that would make most movies look stupid. Not only that they need to be 'battle tested'. They make them they have to test them. You have a President with a photshopped birth certificate. Who would have thought that could happen? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, we can conclude a few things: Quoting: Meaty Youre 34464973 1) It was shot down/disintegrated with something going even faster than it was. 2) If it had hit the city intact thousands would have died. 3) The aliens are friendly and shot it down to help us out. They didnt have to shoot it with something going faster them the meteor. They needed sophisticated acquisition and targeting systems. They dont shoot at where the meteor or missile is, they shoot where it is going to be. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 22444487 United States02/16/2013 09:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 4466048 United States02/16/2013 09:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Looks like that "missile" came from behind. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32004531 I had no idea we have missiles that can travel at 20,000 miles and hour inside of our atmosphere.... The hypersonic glider traveled at 13,000 mph, and that's non-classified tech. Of course there are other projects. [link to www.nbcnews.com]  |
| CalmShock User ID: 5056346 Canada02/16/2013 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 09:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 09:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 30024377 United States02/16/2013 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Rush In User ID: 34464973 United States02/16/2013 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, we can conclude a few things: Quoting: Meaty Youre 34464973 1) It was shot down/disintegrated with something going even faster than it was. 2) If it had hit the city intact thousands would have died. 3) The aliens are friendly and shot it down to help us out. They didnt have to shoot it with something going faster them the meteor. They needed sophisticated acquisition and targeting systems. They dont shoot at where the meteor or missile is, they shoot where it is going to be. Thats not what we're talking about in this thread. There is evidence as outlined in the OP that something hit it coming up from behind, ie. going faster than the object itself. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33913670  Russia02/16/2013 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fragments don't fly/drop faster than the large mass they leave... More like the opposite... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 6603467 Missiles don't suddenly appear, then fly through such a hard target, without exploding, without changing projectary and then suddenly disappear again... Either this is fake as h3ll or else some type of very stealthy hard/protected projectile/craft did the job... ^this |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, we can conclude a few things: Quoting: Meaty Youre 34464973 1) It was shot down/disintegrated with something going even faster than it was. 2) If it had hit the city intact thousands would have died. 3) The aliens are friendly and shot it down to help us out. They didnt have to shoot it with something going faster them the meteor. They needed sophisticated acquisition and targeting systems. They dont shoot at where the meteor or missile is, they shoot where it is going to be. Thats not what we're talking about in this thread. There is evidence as outlined in the OP that something hit it coming up from behind, ie. going faster than the object itself. No there is not. If you look at the other video's that are taken from multiple angles its clear that it was hit in the SIDE not from behind. You have to look at all the angles not one video. |
| MuzzleBreak User ID: 34399654 United States02/16/2013 09:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The large meteor had associated smaller meteors. A trailing, denser, smaller meteor, partially protected in the slip-stream, continued at a faster velocity than the larger meteor, which was slowed and heated dramatically by friction with the Earth's atmosphere. Quoting: MuzzleBreak A smaller meteor broke up, fell back, and then gained on the meteor fast enough to blow it apart on impact? Impossible. Think of a large water melon falling straight down, with a shot-put ball falling directly behind it by a couple of feet. Now imagine that they encounter a surface of 40 foot thick down-feathers. What will happen? Last Edited by MuzzleBreak on 02/16/2013 09:34 PM In his book, "Between Two Ages," Brzezinski wrote: "The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values." MuzzleBreak |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34471935 Germany02/16/2013 09:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So, we can conclude a few things: Quoting: Meaty Youre 34464973 1) It was shot down/disintegrated with something going even faster than it was. 2) If it had hit the city intact thousands would have died. 3) The aliens are friendly and shot it down to help us out. They didnt have to shoot it with something going faster them the meteor. They needed sophisticated acquisition and targeting systems. They dont shoot at where the meteor or missile is, they shoot where it is going to be. Thats not what we're talking about in this thread. There is evidence as outlined in the OP that something hit it coming up from behind, ie. going faster than the object itself. The projectile could also have intercepted the meteor from the side and it would look the same. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 09:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | In the video's we have the projectile comes in from the left and hits the object and continues to the right. But the meteor is also moving from left to right. So it looks like its coming from behind. But its not. Its coming at it from the Side not from behind. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34399218 Canada02/16/2013 09:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 15740069 United States02/16/2013 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Col. Angus User ID: 33715339 United States02/16/2013 09:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
