RUSSIAN METEOR DESTROYED BY UFO - Hits It DEAD-ON, then SPEEDS PAST IT!!

I was thinking it was swamp gas.

Here are some examples of skeet shooting, with close-ups on the clay pigeon. There are some good comparisons to be made with these and the UFO video, I believe. The difference will be that the UFO was probably going a trillion times faster than the skeet shot!

This one has lots of excellent examples of trajectory (is that dark thing flinging to the side on every shot the casing? I know nothing about skeet shots):

“Clay pigeon breaking in slow motion”




"Clay Target Breaking in Slow Motion"





This makes me want to shoot skeet, except I don’t think the birdies or the animals would like the noise!

“Trap Shooting Silver Seitz Skeet Sporting Clay Pigeons”

Total bullshit. Try again.

It's looks similar, but I don't understand why it cuts on and cuts off when it does. I just can't see it too clearly, I guess because it's so darn quick! Maybe they'll get a longer video, and I hope you'll post it here. Thank you!

I knew it...the Freemasons are behind this!!

:dubya:

We totally need a swamp gas icon. This will have to do, I guess!

Why should I bother when you are unable to explain why this is b.s.? If anyone should try again, it is you, for you failed to offer anything to refute this explanation except silly expletives.

Some things to keep in mind about Russia:

Russia is a large, paranoid, militaristic country speckled with heavy industry closed cities that house tens of thousands of people to work in a single uranium enrichment facility.

They have the largest amount of airspace to defend in the world, and also probably the world's largest ballistic defense program.

They have radar structures the size of office buildings.

They have the best watched airspace in the world.

A 50-foot wide space rock is MUCH easier to track than, say, a radar-cutting stealth aircraft. It has a massive heat signature, massive profile, easily identifiable shape to computers... they probably knew it was coming down days ago.

The meteor was going to land on a VERY BAD piece of land, which happens to be one of the most irradiated places on earth, and still holds a host of nuclear facilities. As in, if that meteor came down full force, it could have ended life on the planet. The whole atmosphere would be full of decades of dumped Soviet radioactive particles.

If Russia had ANY idea of the trajectory, it would be their absolute mandate to destroy the rock by any means possible, even at the risk of revealing the capabilities of their best anti-air systems.

Do you guys know what the odds are of a meteor hitting THAT particularly radioactive part of huge-ass Russia? Astronomically small. I've seen it suggested another power may have even "steered" the space rock for this very reason, to find out for sure if Russia has kinetic anti-air systems in place.

And those of you doubting the Kinetic Railgun theory: The US is mounting them on battleships, publicly. That means it's decades old technology if it's being shown off.

If you can fire a large metal beam at supersonic speeds using the nuclear reactor on a floating ship, imagine what you could do with the energy from an actual power plant facility at your disposal. Russia is lousy with 'em.

Great info. I'm trying to get over to rt.com to see what else I can find out, but am having a heckuva time getting there! Betcha they're just a little busy...

Good question OP, great thread BTW, I really don't know but I think it's interesting that is exists.

It could be that "they" are about to play the disclosure card in one form or another and that we could be aided in more ways than one by our extraterrestrial friends.

One thing for sure, I think our supposed "reality" is in for a very large shock.

Damn, I missed this thread. I`ll contribute. I searched for the original video, found it and downloaded it. It looked to me that the close up videos were faked. My powerproducer video editing software wasn`t working so I used VLC. So now I believe and it looks like it came from the side. So I was wondering... if that impact never happened, would some of the meteor actually have hit earth because of the size of it?
Thread: Russian Meteor Hit by Ufo or missile is faked?

I always say, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, then its a duck! We all know ufo's exist, so why not. I'm going with the ufo observation.. Looks like this ufo is a good guy.Your welcome

Last Edited by stars on 02/18/2013 05:03 AM

thats the genuine article.

real ufo folks. take a look.1

nice frame by frame.

it broke it up thats all. didnt destroy it.

We have very good friends up there, thankfully.

You obviously aren't up there in rank w/ the boys club. There are more weapons today then ever in history.

Six interception technologies I know of.

Laser, kinetic, explosive, nuclear, energetic, gravitic, dynamic.

Do they do 30,000 miles a hr, then disapear.?
pretty cool if they do.

I think maybe that it's just breaking up...

No, too many of them would be stolen. If everyone has one it wouldn't be a problem. Everyone in Russia has one.

Can a kinetic projectile be guided?


Has the area been checked for radiation to see if that was a nuclear blast? It was a hell of an explosion. Antimatter?

hahahaha its a fucking black dot. great find! hahahah retard

That's pretty wild.

everybody in russia has dashcams because insurance fraud is so common, people will either jump in front of ur car or back into you in order to claim insurance or file a lawsuit. im considering getting a cheap cam just in case, less than 100 bucks they have good ones. its better than insurance going up or a lawsuit being filed that results in thousands of dollars.

Last Edited by mrmuffins69 on 02/18/2013 11:53 AM

Yes, there's something very hinky about this, and I'm sure our "alien overlords" could be pulling a stunt. They could have exploded this harmlessly in space, rather than letting it almost hit us, and allowing people to be hurt in the process. That may seem to be looking a gift "terminator" in the mouth, but I prefer to deal with facts, not wishful thinking, and I'm sure most GLP-ers do, too.

Love the "Truman" photo - perfect!

Thank you!

There are, in my opinion, valid opinions on both sides. Just some random thoughts, in no particular order:

The "terminator," as I'm going to call it, appears out of nowhere, and then disappears when the job is over. This may be little more than an interesting fact - doesn't really prove its reality.

When you look at the long-range view of the meteor coming into view, you can, or at least I can, really see the point at which the terminator hit it. I'm not sure the whole thing isn't a satellite-generated hologram, but I do think I can see the point in time when the terminator hit.

That is actually one reason I originally thought the whole meteor thing was a hoax, before knowing about the terminator. It started out looking like a meteor, but then it didn't do the damage that a meteor of that size would do, just a few broken windows, a few cuts and boo-boos, according to the news at the time. I don't know what they're claiming for damage now.

Also, not knowing about the terminator, the trajectory of the meteor didn't make any sense. But the bright light that shone over the city seemed real, and related to a celestial body of great brightness, so that was confusing. Not normal meteor behavior, but some aspects that were "meteoric," I guess you could say.

Where are all the pieces? Shouldn't they be just about everywhere, considering how this thing broke up? ARE they everywhere, but we just don't know yet? I've been trying to get bills paid this morning, and haven't seen the latest news, so maybe EVERYTHING has changed, lol.

If it was a hologram or a hoax, it's VERY well created! The physics look right, for the speed and the size and the behavior of this terminator, as far as one could guess, never having seen one before. There are, as I mentioned earlier, other threads from past years that said a UFO destroyed a meteor. I've tried to find them since I did the search before creating the thread, but I haven't had any luck.

There are more, and I'll post them as they come to mind. Thanks for your post!

Yes, in the face of this looking, walking, and quacking like a duck, this person called it a fainting chair. Not that there's anything wrong with fainting chairs - who doesn't love them? But adult conversation must be based on logic, and that comment was not.

A couple of questions: If this is a dashcam, why does it all of a sudden swoop up and focus on the meteor? If the driver did this, wouldn't you hear him (on the version without the music) exclaim or something?

Also, I'm kind of a focus-y person, and I haven't really noticed those two dark objects in the video. What are those - are they artifacts? I think someone else might have mentioned them - if that was on this thread, please accept my apologies for not getting into that, because it's very important!

I downloaded the original video, something does come forward into the tail, hitting the meteor. And it does explode afterwards too. Look up the original video uploaded on youtube from RT.