CHALLENGE TO EVOLUTIONISTS

i think you are confused about our relationship with chimps according to evolution theory.

we would share a common ancestor, we didnt "come from" chimps.

I answered most of your questions, the questions I didn't answer were too stupid to waste time on. You move the goalposts everytime I answer your questions and then act as if I didn't answer them.

If you want to feel like you 'won' feel free.

This is quite funny:

Darwin believed that women evolved from a quite inferior mutation compared to men.

Also it was Mendelssohn that came up with many of the ideas that Darwin would take credit for.

'Survival of the fittest' was someone else's phrase too.

'Survival of the fittest' means death to the weak. This is what we have seen so far. Animals die and get extinct. No new species become from other species.

which question did you answer?

Why does the earth still spin?

durp durp

and how can it's spin rate be decaying and be 4.5 billion years old

Sun energy?

What did I tell you about moving the goalposts?



Last Edited by John Kimble on 02/18/2013 03:25 PM

Of course not. No more than a Honda CRX is related to a Honda Accord. We simply share similar traits.

I'm waiting for you to put forth an argument for evolutionary common descent. Feel free to do so at any time.

and why would, in an intelligent design scenerio, multiple species be given the same traits?

what would be the purpose in that?

Grats on the subterfuge, but I don't think anyone is buying.

YOU SAID - inertia is the reason earth spins

I SAID - explain the earths rotation over 4.5 billion years

I WIN - YOU LOSE - get over it and find a new religeon

Let's see how many pages you can tally up before actually making an argument.

let's see you prove something....it is your thread afterall.

Yes kiddo, you win, now go tell your parents what a good lemming you are.

Philosophical and teleological arguments. Start your own thread.

Feel free to advance your scientific argument for evolution at any time. I have all day.

I am still waiting for a rebuttal to my questions... your earth/inertia theory is discredited... on to the next.

Helena Petrova Blavatsky whom was a big influence on Einstein and Hitler (unfortunately) believed that apes came about from humans mating with some kind of animal (sorry can't remember which one) and that was where she said apes came from. Although I disagree with some of her ideas, she was an extremely intelligent person and I feel in her book Isis Unveiled she proved how much the ancients knew about the world and how modern science denies the ancients their due.

hhhhmmmmm sounds like most intelligent design arguements to me.....

No, you just ask a question which I answer and than you ask another question totally unrelated and act as if I didn't answer any questions.
That is called moving the goalposts, you ask for one thing and when you get an answer you don't like you shift your position to something else.

Its dishonest, childlike and retarded.

yes! and what do we have for our winner?!

a piece of the true cross!

a video of John Lennon roasting in hell!

and an all expense paid trip to the christian natural history museum, where he and his family can view the diorama featuring jesus frolicking with the dinosaurs.!

I'm not an expert in physics, but he proposed a pretty simple equation to you, and it's obvious you copped out. You could only reply with condescending remarks. If his argument is so foolish, you would be able to calmly and clearly explain why.

there was a question in there?



WOW!

The evolution site "tepapamuseum" from NZ also posted this vid to show "religion":


The guy dresses up in clothes like the churches you all have seen. He has the symbol of the sun above the moon also (as catholisism and another large religion has)

[link to www.mysticspirit.net]
"Sun Above, Moon Below’ Elemental meditation Cleansing, "

This is programming and it's been going on for a looong time.

Sure bro, I have been giving him an education about thermodynamics for the past 6 pages and now he changes the subject to the age of the earth. Its called moving the goalposts and something I do not wish to spend more time on cause if he moves the goalposts once he will do it another time.

Last Edited by John Kimble on 02/18/2013 03:36 PM

Page 9 Oyster

Can we expect anything resembling a scientific defense of Evolution by Page 20 perhaps?

i can post some really boring genetics articles if you like, though i doubt you would read them.

You didn't answer any question beyond the second law, I understand your view and you are mistaken. Any professor will tell you there is nothing KNOWN that is exempt from that law.

There is no defense, it's all garbage

I don't need to talk beyond the 2nd law if the 2nd law is the topic.