CHALLENGE TO EVOLUTIONISTS

SO evolutionists

please explain how sexual reproduction came to be?

if that first cell started off reproducing asexually, which would be the most efficient manner, then why would your "nature force" decide to all of a sudden evolve to sexual reproduction? doesnt this just increase competition? when your theory of natural selection rule this out because it is extremely less efficient than asexual reproduction? just how did that first cell decide that it was going to need another cell later on down the road so the information was in that cell to make a female, but for now, just reproduce asexually...


MAKES NO SENSE!!! nobody could pay me to believe the shit that is pushed in the pseudo-science circles that are infiltrating our schools.

Why dont you start with one part of the Bible that is so inaccurate? You have the world's recorded history to make a case, dont tell us you're done now.

either your stupid or just ignorant...why dont you choose one and stick to it. There is proof of evolution, have you heard of the galapagos islands...the tortoises, the finches, genetics, gene mutation, natural selection, SCIENCE. you know, Evolutionists have been sensative to creationists and your damn feelings. If you have so much faith in God, then why are you so hell-bent on proving him and proving science wrong. you must not understand the meaning to the word "Faith".

All they got is Mainstream Media brainwashing them everyday and in their heart, they can't accept a Creator who has rules. So they genuinely accept the brainwashing of MSM that is making them look very stupid.

That's what you get watching a lot of TV and not reading the Word of God - Bible.

Maybe because we know youre believing lies and trying to get you to see that. The galapagos proves adaptation and variation, but that is it. To extend it to the farce that is macroevolution is just wrong and has no basis in proof or evidence, just pigeonholing data to fit your crap theory.

Thousands and thousands of years ago in the ancient civilizations humans existed as they do now. Humans came from God. Some say they came from the stars.

In the ancient cities, before egypt, humans were living with two kinds of warring dinoid and reptilian beings, ape-men, along with other beings. There was an alien war on earth, and humans were caught in the middle of it.

The aliens that arrived on earth began doing genetic experiments. They wanted to make slaves and a body design that was able to function in the native environment. The aliens took the human design, and altered it. They used and mixed in animal DNA and created several different designs. Some of these designs wore down and vanished over time.

Most humans are separate from the beings created during the ancient times, and most certainly separate from apes and monkeys.

It takes great intelligence to design a being with physical hardware and spiritual software.

If you want to know where humankind came from, then you will have to look somewhere off of this planet.

proving science wrong? No Creationist is proving science wrong. Because Creation is Science. Has nothing to do with Evolution False Science.

All you got is bought and paid for Scientists to spread the evolution religion to unleash many Hitlers on earth.

Evolution Scientists knows they've got no funding at all if the turn to the Creation Facts. After all, some of them are paid by the TPTB using fiat money. They're like hitting two birds in one stone. More money and More mind conditioning for themselves so that they can live lustfully and an adulterous lives. Without God, they can do what ever they want, which is a satanic doctrine.

Unleashing legions of Aleister Crowleys in the earth.. The Satan Worshipers.

I don't think that I "came" from an ape. I do think that at a period of time in the very distant past apes and human being's genes were carried by a common ancestor.

If you want to discuss where virtually all life on Earth (with the exception of viruses which don't really satisfy all the criteria of being alive) "came from" then you should look to the little mothers, the bacteria.

LOL.. This is why you are so confused. You've been trained to believe the slightest movement in life is part of a never-ending darwinian trajectory to novel forms of life. Newsflash: It's called BIOLOGY. Organisms adapt and revert back to fluctuating environments.

The variation in finches is due to a process of phenotypic plasticity, where changes in the organism is directly induced by the environment.

It has nothing to do with a random mutation becoming fixated in the populations. That is a retarded and antiquated idea.

Look at the P.Sicula lizards of Pod Mcaru islands. Switching from insect to plant diets will drastically alter several parts of their morphology in a matter of weeks, LIKE CLOCKWORK. NOTHING TO DO WITH NEO-DARWINIAN PROCESSES. There is no blind cobbling together of filtered genetic accidents. It is a BUILT IN RESPONSE SYSTEM TO STRESS.

Here is the study if you're interested. Phenotypic Plasticity is a well documented phenomena.

Anatomical and Physiological Changes Associated with a Recent
Dietary Shift in the Lizard Podarcis sicula

[link to webhost.ua.ac.be]

anyone who supports evolution willing to go after this one? im really curious.

This has got to be the Top 1 dumbest argument I have ever heard.

Dude educate yourself please.

see theyve been indoctrinated to automatically associate adaptation and variation to the theory of evolution. it is really ignorant to stretch it like that.

Yeah.. I have to apologize to this dude.

Sorry for so much of my rants,

I just thought you knew the other side of the story (Creation) which is very logical and accurate compared to evolution which is a very outdated idea with complete of flip flopping scientific explanations.

Please this dude I beg you to repent and read the Creation Story.

I wasnt calling you ignorant man. I was saying that because they take the facts of adaptation and variation and pigeonhole it to their crap theory, that is where the ignorance lies. See my post about reproduction ^^
It makes no sense according to their own theories that sexual reproduction would have evolved from asexually reproducing single celled organisms.

LOL ok that was the other idiot. In which case, I don't owe you a scientific explanation either because I wasn't really even talking to you, nor am I even going to begin tossing my hat into this ring. If you want that information, look it up yourself - it's everywhere on the internet and I'm not about to start doing your research for you.

I was talking about OPs ridiculous assertion of him being a prophet of God or whatever he thinks he is. I'm not taking time out of my busy day to start marshaling scientific evidence here on account of your dumb ass who thinks he has a serious point to prove that all the other serious, real scientists somehow missed. The theory of evolution has holes in it, and everyone pretty much knows that.

But so does the theory of general relativity. Functionally, though, it describes the physical world much better than Newtonian mechanics. That's why we use it, even if general relativity will give way one day to a better theory (which itself might be proven to be inaccurate).

Let's be frank. This whole "mutation doesn't lead to greater complexity" argument is not analogous to general relativity replacing and improving upon Newtonian mechanics. No. It is a step backwards. It's a bunch of bullshit that hick BIble-thumpers tell their kids to brainwash them into thinking that Adam and Even are real, historical people. And after that, they'll take them to the Creationist museum so that their kids can see people riding dinosaurs on saddles. Yeah, you know what I'm talking about.

So you cast some doubt one specific aspect of evolutionary theory? Wow. Give yourself a pat on the back. Even normal scientists who don't believe your ID bullshit are capable of doing that. But you haven't used any of your own scientific evidence either, and I'm not going to provide you any because I pointed out something entirely different about OPs post, not whatever bullshit you decided to interrupt me with. If YOU want to provide scientific evidence about whatever shit you believe, by all means, feel free. I'm not sure though why I should have to pull information on the internet that is freely available for all to see just because you can't do it yourself...

Yeah, but you know what, we just can't blame them entirely for believing lies. With TPTB using fiat money to indoctrinate the masses using every means possible, we just can't blame them entirely.

A few of them may re think their views by reasoning with them like you did.

Here we go again, comparing the dumbest not even a scientific theory - evolution, compared to the theory of general relativity.. Argument.

This is 2nd dumbest argument, comparing science and false science.

See, this fraudster will be going like, why do you have computers? as if there is a connection in between - dude there never was.

Funny, you seem to have plenty of time to fill up this thread with your rambling pointlessness.

Tell me one aspect of Evolution (Common Descent via Darwinian processes) that isn't based on non-falsifiable assumptions and untestable hypotheses.

I agree, the atheistic indoctrination is very widely available on the net too..

So here..

Youre right. There is mass indoctrination going on, but the bible also tells us that men are without excuse, and generally they WANT to believe in evolution so that they arent accountable to an Almighty Holy God. God basically cramps their style, theyve heard both sides, and they resent God.... This was prophesied.

Yep, you can tell you're dealing with an untestable religiously motivated non-theory when evolutionists have to invoke the power of real theories to give it some illusion of authenticity.

My favorite is when they compare Evolution to Gravity. lol

^^^ Yeah, but at least a few of them might wake up and rethink because I was once an avid evolutionist too..

Hahaha that one has got to be higher than top 1 most ignorant argument of all.

of course! thats the goal, thats why we are here now, glad you came to see the TRUTH for what it is :)

I just accepted Evolution as a scientific truth until I became skeptical one day and studied it. I dedicated over a year to scouring the evidence for it, and found out the entire thing was based on assumptions and circular reasoning, and not a shred of real evidence or a testable hypothesis. The Darwinian mechanisms they have proposed for the last 60 years or so are simply laughable in light of what we now know about biology.

This non-theory has nothing going for it except for a massive media and publishing monopoly and it's appealing religious and philosophical qualities for atheists, and people who want to worship themselves.

Hopefully anyone on the fence will give it up and turn to GOD, their true Creator.

Exactly. It seems believable at first because they use truths (adaptation, variation) so that people buy into it at a young age. But they use these truths and force them into their theory, their theories are just castles made of sand. When you really look in depth at the meat of their theories there is no meat, just speculation being paraded around as fact. And of course the general population sees the scientific community as always right generally, and it doesnt help that the theory of evolution makes it seem like people at one time were "primitive beings, their belief in God is just their ignorance"
Its sad how deep the indoctrination goes, and just how it is being funded to keep it perpetrated.

the nervous system evolved twice now.

convergent evolution to the rescue!

non-falsifiable theory.



2013 The Nerve of Those Jellyfish!

Evolutionists believe that the central nervous system developed by chance. Fortunate mutations just happened to cause sensors (for vision, hearing, touch, and smell) to somehow get connected to an accidental brain that just happened to be programmed to process that sensory data and send signals to muscles (or other cells) to respond accordingly to the perceived data. It was such an incredibly good stroke of luck that it could be called “miraculous,” if one weren’t afraid of the word. It is hard to believe that it happened once; it is even harder to believe it happened twice! But, in order to reconcile DNA data with reality, evolutionists now have to believe that stars aligned perfectly twice!

""Biologists have long assumed that the neuron—with its axon, synapses, long processes called dendrites, and a suite of nerve-specific proteins—is the epitome of a specialized cell and thus likely to have evolved only once in the history of life. But a newly sequenced genome of a comb jelly, an ocean-going predator sometimes confused with traditional jellyfish, threatens to upend this view.

The DNA data put these invertebrates, also known as ctenophores, on a different, older branch of the tree of life from that of other organisms with complex nervous systems. This new placement will be controversial, but it suggests to some researchers that nervous systems arose twice. Indeed, the ctenophore's nervous system does appear to be different from those of other animals because its genome lacks genes for proteins that are considered essential to nervous system development and function. "All the things that are fundamental to [a nervous system] are missing in ctenophores," says Casey Dunn, an evolutionary biologist at Brown University. 4""

[link to scienceagainstevolution.info]

to all of the above plus 1 or 2 other factors too?:

2 Corinthians 4:4 among whom the god of this system of things has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that the illumination of the glorious good news about the Christ, who is the image+ of God, might not shine through.

And- 1 John 5:20 But we know that the Son of God has come,and he has given us intellectual capacity that we may gain the knowledge of the true one."

A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution

[link to www.uncommondescent.com]



Let me tell you what goes on in the back rooms of science – with National Academy members, with Nobel Prize winners. I have sat with them, and when I get them alone, not in public – because it’s a scary thing, if you say what I just said – I say, “Do you understand all of this, where all of this came from, and how this happens?” Every time that I have sat with people who are synthetic chemists, who understand this, they go “Uh-uh. Nope.” These people are just so far off, on how to believe this stuff came together. I’ve sat with National Academy members, with Nobel Prize winners. Sometimes I will say, “Do you understand this?”And if they’re afraid to say “Yes,” they say nothing. They just stare at me, because they can’t sincerely do it.


[link to www.youtube.com]