REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
Message Subject
|
CHALLENGE TO EVOLUTIONISTS
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
Post Content
|
...
OK. Let me explain how this works. I'm not providing you scientific evidence of anything, and here's why.
The standard of proof you used in your argument doesn't call for scientific argumentation. You claimed that God talked to you and told you the truth. Ergo, I am not going to provide you scientific evidence to refute your wholly unscientific claim.
All I can say to you is that God spoke to me and told me that people who deny evolution have only imagined such things. Otherwise, I do not owe you the dignity of providing scientific evidence when you have provided none yourself. Understand?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34709676 No, because I didnt specify 'God' in that post. I mentioned mutations, which you want to cleverly sidestep. If you dont know, dont bother. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2183540 Well well thanks for calling me clever - that's probably the best compliment I'm going to get from you so I'll take it. Actually, I was responding to your original post (as you can see by reading my first response), which stated: "It was through studying evolution, that God revealed to me that this 'theory' was the imagination of foolish men, and delivered me to the Lord Jesus Christ. I pray for the same for others reading. Seek the Absolute Truth!" It didn't occur to me that a scientific-minded person would have made that statement, so you'll have to, ahem, forgive me for not refuting you using PROPER scientific documentation, doctor (which I'm assuming is your title, naturally). And if I am mistaken, and you are indeed the next Albert Einstein of microbiology, ready to stun us all with your powerful and compelling evisceration of doctrinal evolutionary theory, even you should know, with that powerful scientific mind of yours, that disproving evolutionary theory does not amount to proving the existence of God or intelligent design. It would merely serve to disprove evolution. You still haven't provided one shred of evidence proving the existence of God, so your case remains unproven, and unfalsifiable (besides the voices in your head, of course). Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34709676 That wasnt me, quote better next time. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 2183540 LOL ok that was the other idiot. In which case, I don't owe you a scientific explanation either because I wasn't really even talking to you, nor am I even going to begin tossing my hat into this ring. If you want that information, look it up yourself - it's everywhere on the internet and I'm not about to start doing your research for you. I was talking about OPs ridiculous assertion of him being a prophet of God or whatever he thinks he is. I'm not taking time out of my busy day to start marshaling scientific evidence here on account of your dumb ass who thinks he has a serious point to prove that all the other serious, real scientists somehow missed. The theory of evolution has holes in it, and everyone pretty much knows that. But so does the theory of general relativity. Functionally, though, it describes the physical world much better than Newtonian mechanics. That's why we use it, even if general relativity will give way one day to a better theory (which itself might be proven to be inaccurate). Let's be frank. This whole "mutation doesn't lead to greater complexity" argument is not analogous to general relativity replacing and improving upon Newtonian mechanics. No. It is a step backwards. It's a bunch of bullshit that hick BIble-thumpers tell their kids to brainwash them into thinking that Adam and Even are real, historical people. And after that, they'll take them to the Creationist museum so that their kids can see people riding dinosaurs on saddles. Yeah, you know what I'm talking about. So you cast some doubt one specific aspect of evolutionary theory? Wow. Give yourself a pat on the back. Even normal scientists who don't believe your ID bullshit are capable of doing that. But you haven't used any of your own scientific evidence either, and I'm not going to provide you any because I pointed out something entirely different about OPs post, not whatever bullshit you decided to interrupt me with. If YOU want to provide scientific evidence about whatever shit you believe, by all means, feel free. I'm not sure though why I should have to pull information on the internet that is freely available for all to see just because you can't do it yourself...
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|