New Bill Requires Cops to Inspect your Home for Guns. Manufacturers Refuse to Sell Weapons to Police Depts. Feds Buy Ammo for 24-year War

Based on the recent legislation in New York, we are prohibited from selling rifles and receivers to residents of New York.

We have chosen to extend that prohibition to all governmental agencies associated with or located within New York.

As a result we have halted sales of rifles, short barreled rifles, short barreled shotguns, machine guns, and silencers to New York governmental agencies.

For “civilian” customers residing in New York: At your choice, we will:

Complete your order and ship to a dealer of your choice outside of NY.
Refund your payment in full.
Hold your items here for up to 6 months, at no charge – if you are in the process of leaving NY and taking residence in another state.

For LE/Govt customers in New York: Your orders have been cancelled.

[link to patdollard.com]

Missouri Democrats introduced an anti-gun bill which would turn law-abiding firearm owners into criminals. They will have 90 days to turn in their guns if the legislation is passed.

[link to www.thegatewaypundit.com]

FEDS BUYING ENOUGH BULLETS FOR '24-YEAR WAR'

Radio host warns: DHS preparing for prolonged riots in U.S.

Read more at [link to www.wnd.com]

DRONES TAKING TO THE SKIES IN U.S.

Feds step up efforts to license surveillance aircraft

Read more at [link to www.wnd.com]

DHS the new Nazi Storm troopers

More like, the traitors responsible shall have 90 days to repeal their own unconstitutional law...

NO.

The New Bolsheviks.

This is the first good news I've heard in ages. FINALLY, someone with real clout is standing up for We the People. They need to do the same with Chicago.

5 stars

Finally, some spine.
I have wondered how long Americans would put up with this shit, being treated like criminals in their own country

Epic move ;)

if yer think its gona be anothr tea party to take back the power im afraid itll be a whole diffrent kettle of fish
youll find your own govenment not so understanding

I'm just a lowly AC but this deserves to be pinned. It's pretty important news.

:Background Check:

COPS REQUIRED TO INSPECT GUN OWNERS' HOMES

Major effort calls for sheriff to probe dwellings

Forget police drones flying over your house. How about police coming inside, once a year, to have a look around?

[link to seattletimes.com]

Washington State Democrats have sponsored Senate Bill 5737, which has a little provision that apparently was to go unnoticed that would have said that police have a right to search a private citizen’s home once per year if they own certain types of firearms.

According to the legislation:

In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall … safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.

[link to www.blacklistednews.com]

I believe it's up to 8 manufacturers/suppliers now.

I hope it keeps growing!

Enough bullets for a 24-year war?

Right. Since when has the number of bullets for a 'war' been defined.

Doesn't make sense.

and a pin request

WHY IS MEXICO ASKING THE U.S. SENATE FOR A REGISTRY OF U.S. GUN OWNERS?

[link to www.theblaze.com]

‘ORWELLIAN’: PROPOSED GUN LAW IN WASHINGTON STATE CALLS ON POLICE TO INSPECT THE HOMES OF ‘ASSAULT WEAPON’ OWNERS

[link to www.theblaze.com]

I have a question.
Since the 2nd doesnt explain what "arms", does that mean then, that americans should have the right to have nuclear warheads in their backyards?
or where do you drawn the line, since "the right to bear arms" defines no line whatsoever?

Much thanks for pin!!

Must...sniff...undies

Well the police work for the city and therefor city property which gives the citizens the right to inspect their guns any time they want.It goes both ways BACON and we can play this game too.

EXREMELY SCARY... BUT EXTREMELY TRUE. THIS IS HAPPENING!

Straw man argument. Arms are weapons a soldier can carry as defined by what our Framers discussed. Why is it people from other countries always try to use these idiotic arguments when they don't research what the framers were talking about.