NO PROOF THE BIBLE IS REAL! | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 750749 Sweden 02/18/2013 06:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34671332 United States 02/18/2013 06:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 15101119 Philippines 02/18/2013 06:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6853586 United States 02/18/2013 06:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 34619727 United States 02/18/2013 06:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 34619727 United States 02/18/2013 06:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost all schrolars agree that Jesus and the Bible were both fake. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34619727 lol, You were made from a rock 4.6 billion years ago, your great aunt is a tomato I'm a non-Evolutionist Atheist. Meaning I do not believe in a God and I do not believe in Evolution. |
Sword of mercy User ID: 739547 United Kingdom 02/18/2013 06:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Kalles Kaviar User ID: 3264930 Sweden 02/18/2013 06:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 750749 Sweden 02/18/2013 06:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 24238594 United States 02/18/2013 06:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost all schrolars agree that Jesus and the Bible were both fake. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34619727 Clearly they were not getting what they wanted from life so have to form an opinion to get them attention... which you clearly did not see as BS. When the time comes, and it is now upon us or at least the beginning of it is, you will know who was right and who was wrong. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 788508 Spain 02/18/2013 06:48 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | no, your very wrong on "most scholars" agree that Christ wasn't a real person.. most scholars, if not all, agree that he probably was a real person. What they don't agree on is the "what, when and where"( when he was born, where he went, what he did, ect) As far as the bibles concerned, they agree on its most likely historical nature regarding places, names of people ect..but know that its politically driven interests, in the writing of the book, makes it obscure and doubtful as in the truth of the stories behind the names and places |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 6853586 United States 02/18/2013 06:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost all schrolars agree that Jesus and the Bible were both fake. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34619727 lol, You were made from a rock 4.6 billion years ago, your great aunt is a tomato I'm a non-Evolutionist Atheist. Meaning I do not believe in a God and I do not believe in Evolution. So, you believe what then? You weren't put here by design, nor are you randomly sprout out of a rock... Why are you here? You are a lukewarm individual it sounds. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17994984 United Kingdom 02/18/2013 06:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost all schrolars agree that Jesus and the Bible were both fake. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34619727 lol, You were made from a rock 4.6 billion years ago, your great aunt is a tomato I'm a non-Evolutionist Atheist. Meaning I do not believe in a God and I do not believe in Evolution. Say what you will about beliefs in Gods, but the fact that you ever "believed" in evolution shows much about your intellectual fortitude |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34668589 Australia 02/18/2013 06:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
OneFootUnder User ID: 34444713 Belgium 02/18/2013 06:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | no, your very wrong on "most scholars" agree that Christ wasn't a real person.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 788508 most scholars, if not all, agree that he probably was a real person. What they don't agree on is the "what, when and where"( when he was born, where he went, what he did, ect) As far as the bibles concerned, they agree on its most likely historical nature regarding places, names of people ect..but know that its politically driven interests, in the writing of the book, makes it obscure and doubtful as in the truth of the stories behind the names and places Isn't that just because if you deny the existence of Jesus you're frowned upon? Or perhaps even considered a nut. So people don't dare to deny His existence. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34670369 United States 02/18/2013 06:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 13422246 Philippines 02/18/2013 07:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
recollector User ID: 26964049 United Kingdom 02/18/2013 07:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Aman User ID: 33575868 United States 02/18/2013 07:24 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Doublediamond User ID: 34674031 United States 02/18/2013 07:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ninnie User ID: 34674477 South Africa 02/18/2013 07:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Bible prophecy and events dovetail in history and it has been happening over thousands of years, that is proof. Read what God says when mankind denies Bible prophecy made clear by the event/s. He says we turn His Word into Wormwood. This the world has done and we are all in trouble because of this. The rest that does not need mentioning as happening right now and what is on our doorstep is the final proof and it will be too late to repent. God is the author of The Bible. Those standing in the holy place as fraudsters is the reason why you think like you think = deceived by people who do not believe = spiritually impotent = they rely on the power of darkness to work for them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 14328296 Netherlands 02/18/2013 07:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1743891 Australia 02/18/2013 08:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Almost all schrolars agree that Jesus and the Bible were both fake. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34619727 Really!! Then why are we still using a calendar that is based on Anno Domini??!! So for 2013 years we've based our calendar on someone that never existed..... riiiiight!! Get your facts right before posting ridiculous threads. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 34674031 United States 02/18/2013 08:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 28649819 United States 02/18/2013 08:19 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Doublediamond User ID: 34674031 United States 02/18/2013 08:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Doublediamond User ID: 34674031 United States 02/18/2013 08:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 3462846 Canada 02/18/2013 08:33 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The prophecies of the book of Daniel was the reason I started studying prophecies, these prophecies are so accurate, that only divine knowledge could have gave them to him. That is the reason we know that God and the Bible are real. God tells us He gives us these things, so that when they come to past we may believe. Here are some videos for you to watch, if you want to learn [link to amazingdiscoveries.tv] [link to amazingdiscoveries.tv] Also the 70 weeks of years prophecy for the nation of Israel. [link to amazingdiscoveries.org] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1387177 United States 02/18/2013 08:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 788508 Spain 02/18/2013 08:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | no, your very wrong on "most scholars" agree that Christ wasn't a real person.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 788508 most scholars, if not all, agree that he probably was a real person. What they don't agree on is the "what, when and where"( when he was born, where he went, what he did, ect) As far as the bibles concerned, they agree on its most likely historical nature regarding places, names of people ect..but know that its politically driven interests, in the writing of the book, makes it obscure and doubtful as in the truth of the stories behind the names and places Isn't that just because if you deny the existence of Jesus you're frowned upon? Or perhaps even considered a nut. So people don't dare to deny His existence. Yes, true. But even historians and many archeologists, on the most part agree because of the peoples and events that took place surrounding Jesus, which they know as being fact. |