Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,777 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,340,953
Pageviews Today: 3,352,791Threads Today: 892Posts Today: 16,496
10:45 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?

 
George B (OP)

User ID: 19998253
United States
03/29/2013 03:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
My NOTE: There is no evidence the sulfur compounds are all from surface emissions . . . why . . . they were measured in or near the stratosphere . . .
 Quoting: George B



The reference you quote says

"The lack of major eruptions since 1991 has made the
identification of this input much clearer than earlier
measurements, but the data do not rule out some contribution
to the increases in the stratospheric aerosol burden from
anthropogenic sources [such as coal burning, see (14) as
well]."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


Sure . . . they accept ground sources as a possible source (which is not highly likely) but never consider intentional Aerosol Injection into the Stratosphere because it never crossed their mind . . . to them it is not an option because no one says it is happening . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Why is it " not highly likely"?!

Because you say so?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Paragraph 2.6.4

"If anthropogenic SO2 emissions can account for
more than half of the stratospheric background sulfate
aerosol, future changes in anthropogenic SO2 emission
could have an important impact on stratospheric sulfate
aerosol loading. One can ask whether the past secular
trend in anthropogenic SO2 emission has caused an increase in the loading of stratospheric aerosol. This question cannot be easily answered from the limited existing
set of observations. Analysis of time series related to the stratospheric aerosol layer does not show any evidence of a trend in the nonvolcanic aerosol loading between the
late 1970s, the late 1980s, and the late 1990s to the present(see Chapter 4).
The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002). [link to ozone.unep.org]
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
WindyMind

User ID: 21208063
United States
03/29/2013 03:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


What a ridiculous cop-out!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I suspect you figured that out. . . .applause2 No, it is what I believe . . . actually . . .
 Quoting: George B


So, you actually believe these people have "felt" there way in regard to the trails in the sky, and have done quite well, and aren't making assumptions based on a lack of education in certain subjects?!

I'm asking you specifically...not about "some people" this...and "some people" that...

Do you think VT is seeing "chemtrails" or contrails over Vermont. What is more likely?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Ya, I get that snake is not that bad. Maybe you should.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5141990
United States
03/29/2013 03:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
[link to www.rawstory.com]

Could it be....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


What a ridiculous cop-out!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I suspect you figured that out. . . .applause2 No, it is what I believe . . . actually . . .
 Quoting: George B


So, you actually believe these people have "felt" there way in regard to the trails in the sky, and have done quite well, and aren't making assumptions based on a lack of education in certain subjects?!

I'm asking you specifically...not about "some people" this...and "some people" that...

Do you think VT is seeing "chemtrails" or contrails over Vermont. What is more likely?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Hmm...reading isn't your strong point....
Read the post again and use some reading comprehension.

You SAY you have seen "chemtrails" and then fail to prove it...and fail to show you understand contrails.

You have no way of knowing the chemical composition of the trails and you make assumptions. There is no way you can look at a trail, and from the way it looks or how long it lasts, say its a "chemtrail".

I don't care about what you and snake do.
vtcw
User ID: 37105744
United States
03/29/2013 03:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


What makes you think they are chemtrails?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


What makes you think that they are not? Of course some are contrails. Not everything plane is leaving chemtrails.
Maybe the word chemtrail is what some people don't understand.
vtcw
User ID: 37105744
United States
03/29/2013 03:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


I suspect you figured that out. . . .applause2 No, it is what I believe . . . actually . . .
 Quoting: George B


So, you actually believe these people have "felt" there way in regard to the trails in the sky, and have done quite well, and aren't making assumptions based on a lack of education in certain subjects?!

I'm asking you specifically...not about "some people" this...and "some people" that...

Do you think VT is seeing "chemtrails" or contrails over Vermont. What is more likely?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Ya, I get that snake is not that bad. Maybe you should.
 Quoting: WindyMind


I think that he is a better man then most of the shills on here.
George B (OP)

User ID: 19998253
United States
03/29/2013 03:36 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Table 2-13. Estimated sulfur emission rates in years 2000, 2030, and 2100 and the model-calculated
corresponding tropospheric and stratospheric sulfate burdens. The cited values for the simulated burdens
are from Chin et al. (2001).

[link to ozone.unep.org]
page 2.43

Their contribution is extremely static and does not vary significantly over time . . .

Last Edited by George B on 03/29/2013 03:38 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...



The reference you quote says

"The lack of major eruptions since 1991 has made the
identification of this input much clearer than earlier
measurements, but the data do not rule out some contribution
to the increases in the stratospheric aerosol burden from
anthropogenic sources [such as coal burning, see (14) as
well]."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


Sure . . . they accept ground sources as a possible source (which is not highly likely) but never consider intentional Aerosol Injection into the Stratosphere because it never crossed their mind . . . to them it is not an option because no one says it is happening . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Why is it " not highly likely"?!

Because you say so?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Paragraph 2.6.4

"If anthropogenic SO2 emissions can account for
more than half of the stratospheric background sulfate
aerosol, future changes in anthropogenic SO2 emission
could have an important impact on stratospheric sulfate
aerosol loading. One can ask whether the past secular
trend in anthropogenic SO2 emission has caused an increase in the loading of stratospheric aerosol. This question cannot be easily answered from the limited existing
set of observations. Analysis of time series related to the stratospheric aerosol layer does not show any evidence of a trend in the nonvolcanic aerosol loading between the
late 1970s, the late 1980s, and the late 1990s to the present(see Chapter 4).
The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002). [link to ozone.unep.org]
 Quoting: George B


So, you are suggesting that "anthropogenic" and "ground source" mean the same thing?!
vtcw
User ID: 37105744
United States
03/29/2013 03:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


I suspect you figured that out. . . .applause2 No, it is what I believe . . . actually . . .
 Quoting: George B


So, you actually believe these people have "felt" there way in regard to the trails in the sky, and have done quite well, and aren't making assumptions based on a lack of education in certain subjects?!

I'm asking you specifically...not about "some people" this...and "some people" that...

Do you think VT is seeing "chemtrails" or contrails over Vermont. What is more likely?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Hmm...reading isn't your strong point....
Read the post again and use some reading comprehension.

You SAY you have seen "chemtrails" and then fail to prove it...and fail to show you understand contrails.

You have no way of knowing the chemical composition of the trails and you make assumptions. There is no way you can look at a trail, and from the way it looks or how long it lasts, say its a "chemtrail".

I don't care about what you and snake do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


So, you actually believe these people have "felt" there way in regard to the trails in the sky, and have done quite well, and aren't making assumptions based on a lack of education in certain subjects?!

I'm asking you specifically...not about "some people" this...and "some people" that...

Do you think VT is seeing "chemtrails" or contrails over Vermont. What is more likely?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Ya, I get that snake is not that bad. Maybe you should.
 Quoting: WindyMind


I think that he is a better man then most of the shills on here.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Of course you do...you chemtards stick by each other...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Ya, I get that snake is not that bad. Maybe you should.
 Quoting: WindyMind


I think that he is a better man then most of the shills on here.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Of course you do...you chemtards stick by each other...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Oops, I thought you meant George...I guess your lack of reading comprehension is contagious...
George B (OP)

User ID: 19998253
United States
03/29/2013 03:39 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


Sure . . . they accept ground sources as a possible source (which is not highly likely) but never consider intentional Aerosol Injection into the Stratosphere because it never crossed their mind . . . to them it is not an option because no one says it is happening . . . coffee4
 Quoting: George B


Why is it " not highly likely"?!

Because you say so?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Paragraph 2.6.4

"If anthropogenic SO2 emissions can account for
more than half of the stratospheric background sulfate
aerosol, future changes in anthropogenic SO2 emission
could have an important impact on stratospheric sulfate
aerosol loading. One can ask whether the past secular
trend in anthropogenic SO2 emission has caused an increase in the loading of stratospheric aerosol. This question cannot be easily answered from the limited existing
set of observations. Analysis of time series related to the stratospheric aerosol layer does not show any evidence of a trend in the nonvolcanic aerosol loading between the
late 1970s, the late 1980s, and the late 1990s to the present(see Chapter 4).
The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002). [link to ozone.unep.org]
 Quoting: George B


So, you are suggesting that "anthropogenic" and "ground source" mean the same thing?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Yes . . . I should have been more specific . . .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
vtcw
User ID: 37105744
United States
03/29/2013 03:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Ya, I get that snake is not that bad. Maybe you should.
 Quoting: WindyMind


I think that he is a better man then most of the shills on here.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Of course you do...you chemtards stick by each other...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Birds of a feather flock together pphtt
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


So, you actually believe these people have "felt" there way in regard to the trails in the sky, and have done quite well, and aren't making assumptions based on a lack of education in certain subjects?!

I'm asking you specifically...not about "some people" this...and "some people" that...

Do you think VT is seeing "chemtrails" or contrails over Vermont. What is more likely?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Hmm...reading isn't your strong point....
Read the post again and use some reading comprehension.

You SAY you have seen "chemtrails" and then fail to prove it...and fail to show you understand contrails.

You have no way of knowing the chemical composition of the trails and you make assumptions. There is no way you can look at a trail, and from the way it looks or how long it lasts, say its a "chemtrail".

I don't care about what you and snake do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Yet, you feel the need to argue about it when others say it's most likely contrails...

And maybe the chemicals in the tap water cause the rainbows...right?!

You chemtards make the crazy sprinkler lady look like a genius.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


Why is it " not highly likely"?!

Because you say so?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Paragraph 2.6.4

"If anthropogenic SO2 emissions can account for
more than half of the stratospheric background sulfate
aerosol, future changes in anthropogenic SO2 emission
could have an important impact on stratospheric sulfate
aerosol loading. One can ask whether the past secular
trend in anthropogenic SO2 emission has caused an increase in the loading of stratospheric aerosol. This question cannot be easily answered from the limited existing
set of observations. Analysis of time series related to the stratospheric aerosol layer does not show any evidence of a trend in the nonvolcanic aerosol loading between the
late 1970s, the late 1980s, and the late 1990s to the present(see Chapter 4).
The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002). [link to ozone.unep.org]
 Quoting: George B


So, you are suggesting that "anthropogenic" and "ground source" mean the same thing?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Yes . . . I should have been more specific . . .
 Quoting: George B


So, that's a yes...you do think these terms mean the same thing?!

Wow....
vtcw
User ID: 37105744
United States
03/29/2013 03:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


I'm kind of puzzled as to why you are asking George B what I see. To answer your question- man/woman behind the curtain, yes I've seen plenty of chemtrails in Vermont, as well as in numerous other states. Maybe I should take Snake up on his offer to meet at xxxxxxxx Park so we can watch sunset chemtrails together. He will be another witness.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Hmm...reading isn't your strong point....
Read the post again and use some reading comprehension.

You SAY you have seen "chemtrails" and then fail to prove it...and fail to show you understand contrails.

You have no way of knowing the chemical composition of the trails and you make assumptions. There is no way you can look at a trail, and from the way it looks or how long it lasts, say its a "chemtrail".

I don't care about what you and snake do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Yet, you feel the need to argue about it when others say it's most likely contrails...

And maybe the chemicals in the tap water cause the rainbows...right?!

You chemtards make the crazy sprinkler lady look like a genius.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Raintards.. Crazytards. Sprinklertards. Geniustards.. lolsign
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36488183
United States
03/29/2013 03:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744




So you expect everyone to take your word on faith. As if your proclamations carry more weight than any scientific evidence. I will ask but expect the question will be ignored since no chemtrail believer has yet to answer, what is your science background?
George B (OP)

User ID: 19998253
United States
03/29/2013 03:45 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


Paragraph 2.6.4

"If anthropogenic SO2 emissions can account for
more than half of the stratospheric background sulfate
aerosol, future changes in anthropogenic SO2 emission
could have an important impact on stratospheric sulfate
aerosol loading. One can ask whether the past secular
trend in anthropogenic SO2 emission has caused an increase in the loading of stratospheric aerosol. This question cannot be easily answered from the limited existing
set of observations. Analysis of time series related to the stratospheric aerosol layer does not show any evidence of a trend in the nonvolcanic aerosol loading between the
late 1970s, the late 1980s, and the late 1990s to the present(see Chapter 4).
The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002). [link to ozone.unep.org]
 Quoting: George B


So, you are suggesting that "anthropogenic" and "ground source" mean the same thing?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Yes . . . I should have been more specific . . .
 Quoting: George B


So, that's a yes...you do think these terms mean the same thing?!

Wow....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


I did not say they were the same . . . I am referring to the following quote . . . The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002).

Last Edited by George B on 03/29/2013 03:46 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


Hmm...reading isn't your strong point....
Read the post again and use some reading comprehension.

You SAY you have seen "chemtrails" and then fail to prove it...and fail to show you understand contrails.

You have no way of knowing the chemical composition of the trails and you make assumptions. There is no way you can look at a trail, and from the way it looks or how long it lasts, say its a "chemtrail".

I don't care about what you and snake do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Yet, you feel the need to argue about it when others say it's most likely contrails...

And maybe the chemicals in the tap water cause the rainbows...right?!

You chemtards make the crazy sprinkler lady look like a genius.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Raintards.. Crazytards. Sprinklertards. Geniustards.. lolsign
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744

No, just the ones who think that contrails are chemtrails earn the "tard" suffix.
vtcw
User ID: 37105744
United States
03/29/2013 03:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744




So you expect everyone to take your word on faith. As if your proclamations carry more weight than any scientific evidence. I will ask but expect the question will be ignored since no chemtrail believer has yet to answer, what is your science background?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


Yes, take my word on faith. I believe very much in the Lord.
I'm a Faithtard. Bibletard.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


So, you are suggesting that "anthropogenic" and "ground source" mean the same thing?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Yes . . . I should have been more specific . . .
 Quoting: George B


So, that's a yes...you do think these terms mean the same thing?!

Wow....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


I did not say they were the same . . . I am referring to the following quote . . . The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002).
 Quoting: George B


...


So, you are suggesting that "anthropogenic" and "ground source" mean the same thing?!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Yes . . . I should have been more specific . . .
 Quoting: George B


So, that's a yes...you do think these terms mean the same thing?!

Wow....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


I did not say they were the same . . . I am referring to the following quote . . . The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002).
 Quoting: George B


OMG George...look at what you wrote before I wrote "Why is it " not highly likely"?!" And ten look at your reply to that same statement...
vtcw
User ID: 37105744
United States
03/29/2013 03:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Yet, you feel the need to argue about it when others say it's most likely contrails...

And maybe the chemicals in the tap water cause the rainbows...right?!

You chemtards make the crazy sprinkler lady look like a genius.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Raintards.. Crazytards. Sprinklertards. Geniustards.. lolsign
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744

No, just the ones who think that contrails are chemtrails earn the "tard" suffix.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Why do you guys take contrails so seriously?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744




So you expect everyone to take your word on faith. As if your proclamations carry more weight than any scientific evidence. I will ask but expect the question will be ignored since no chemtrail believer has yet to answer, what is your science background?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


Apparently she doesn't expect us to do anything with her statements. She's just letting us know what se saw...like a kid with Down's telling the world he has a cookie...

She doesn't want debate....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


Yet, you feel the need to argue about it when others say it's most likely contrails...

And maybe the chemicals in the tap water cause the rainbows...right?!

You chemtards make the crazy sprinkler lady look like a genius.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Raintards.. Crazytards. Sprinklertards. Geniustards.. lolsign
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744

No, just the ones who think that contrails are chemtrails earn the "tard" suffix.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Why do you guys take contrails so seriously?
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Because you people are so serious about spreading the ignorance as truth, when the truth matters so much more.

You people are spreading lies about people and subjects you know nothing about.
vtcw
User ID: 37105744
United States
03/29/2013 03:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744




So you expect everyone to take your word on faith. As if your proclamations carry more weight than any scientific evidence. I will ask but expect the question will be ignored since no chemtrail believer has yet to answer, what is your science background?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


Apparently she doesn't expect us to do anything with her statements. She's just letting us know what se saw...like a kid with Down's telling the world he has a cookie...

She doesn't want debate....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Why would I debate with someone on here that I don't know a thing about. That doesn't seem very logical. If you don't believe me, so be it, not a big deal.

And please give me back my cookie. huffy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 03:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744




So you expect everyone to take your word on faith. As if your proclamations carry more weight than any scientific evidence. I will ask but expect the question will be ignored since no chemtrail believer has yet to answer, what is your science background?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


Yes, take my word on faith. I believe very much in the Lord.
I'm a Faithtard. Bibletard.
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


At least you can admit it....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36488183
United States
03/29/2013 04:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I did not say they were the same . . . I am referring to the following quote . . . The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002).
 Quoting: George B


But your interest was AFTER 1990. What happenend to anthropogenic SO2 emission after 1990?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
03/29/2013 04:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I don't think that you understand that I don't have to prove anything to anyone. That's not what I'm doing, I don't care if you think everything in the world is a contrail. Hee heee....Maybe cotton candy is really a contrail..
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744




So you expect everyone to take your word on faith. As if your proclamations carry more weight than any scientific evidence. I will ask but expect the question will be ignored since no chemtrail believer has yet to answer, what is your science background?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


Apparently she doesn't expect us to do anything with her statements. She's just letting us know what se saw...like a kid with Down's telling the world he has a cookie...

She doesn't want debate....
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064


Why would I debate with someone on here that I don't know a thing about. That doesn't seem very logical. If you don't believe me, so be it, not a big deal.

And please give me back my cookie. huffy
 Quoting: vtcw 37105744


Lol! The funny thing is, no one wants to debate you! You obviously see contrails, and use your limited education and propensity to believe in conspiracy theories to come to a conclusion based on assumption and anecdotal "evidence" you have accepted as truth from other chemtards. The fact remains, you have no evidence that any trail you've seen is anything more than a contrail.

You're here to lend support to George...we get it...and don't care.

Personally, I'd rather discuss the subject with a rock than with you.


But, the truth IS a big deal...and needs to be posted alongside the lies and stupid nonsense the chemtards post as truth.

There is no debate.

Have you seen evidence that anyone has flown through a trail that you, or any other chemtard has seen, and found it to contain anything more than water vapor and combustion gases?! Nope!

That's the truth! You can call them "chemtrails" but it's a lie!

Jesus isn't gonna like that!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 5917739
United States
03/29/2013 04:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I did not say they were the same . . . I am referring to the following quote . . . The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002).
 Quoting: George B


George is a bad doggie, no biscuit.
George B (OP)

User ID: 19998253
United States
03/29/2013 04:08 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I did not say they were the same . . . I am referring to the following quote . . . The average global anthropogenic SO2 emission strength has probably been fairly constant between 1980 and 1990, the increases in some regions being compensated by decreases in other regions (Boucher and Pham, 2002).
 Quoting: George B


But your interest was AFTER 1990. What happenend to anthropogenic SO2 emission after 1990?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


According to the EPA in the US and like agencies in Europe the ground level concentrations went down. . . .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!