Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,673 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 780,651
Pageviews Today: 1,026,792Threads Today: 214Posts Today: 4,413
09:43 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
04/02/2013 01:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
dry air is not a conductor it's an insulator...how do you get air to cosistantly conduct electricity so your cell phone works all the time???? just add aluminum...it's pretty simple physics!!!!
 Quoting: blue 31963014


Wow....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36419852
United States
04/02/2013 10:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
[link to www.bbc.com]

So how does that work? The ice crystals of cirrus clouds generally form spontaneously in moist, cold air. But seed particles, if present in the right concentration, could grab all the water vapour to produce a small number of large ice crystals, preventing the formation of lots of unseeded little ones. This would have two consequences. First, the resulting clouds would be more transparent – just as big blobs of water in oil create a more transparent mixture as salad dressing separates out, compared with the milky, opaque emulsion you get when you shake it into lots of tiny droplets. Thinner clouds absorb less radiation from the warm ground, allowing more to escape into space. Second, clouds made from larger ice particles have shorter lives, because the big crystals sink down through the atmosphere under gravity.

Fine balance

One of the advantages of climate engineering via clouds is that the effects are transient: if it doesn’t go to plan, the process can be stopped and all will return to normal in a matter of weeks. Mitchell and Finnegan suggested that one could seed cirrus clouds by releasing particles from aircraft. They also suggested a good material for the seeds, the somewhat exotic (but not excessively costly) compound bismuth tri-iodide, as it is known to promote ice formation on its surface.
__________________________________________________________

lol. Any geoengineering going on in England yet?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990


It says proposed
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1645786



yeah...funny shit proposed.



snarl
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990


None of those tests have anything to do with contrails and most of those tests were done at ground level, like inside the underground tunnels or from a ship.

"In another chapter, 'Large Area Coverage Trials', the MoD describes how between 1961 and 1968 more than a million people along the south coast of England, from Torquay to the New Forest, were exposed to bacteria including e.coli and bacillus globigii, which mimics anthrax. These releases came from a military ship, the Icewhale, anchored off the Dorset coast, which sprayed the micro-organisms in a five to 10-mile radius."

The air releases were at 500 feet, not 30,000
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


[link to www.whale.to]

One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population. The chemical drifted miles inland, its fluorescence allowing the spread to be monitored. In another trial using zinc cadmium sulphide, a generator was towed along a road near Frome in Somerset where it spewed the chemical for an hour.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36419852
United States
04/02/2013 10:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Weather is the day-to-day state of the atmosphere in a region, and its short-term (minutes to weeks) variation whereas Climate is defined as statistical weather information that describes the variation of weather at a given place for a specified interval. They are both used interchangeably sometimes but differ in their measure of time, and trends that affect them.
[link to www.diffen.com]

Weather vs climate...whatever.

Chemtrail, CHEMTRAILS, ChemTRails, CHEMtrails...

s226
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
04/02/2013 12:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


It says proposed
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1645786



yeah...funny shit proposed.



snarl
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990


None of those tests have anything to do with contrails and most of those tests were done at ground level, like inside the underground tunnels or from a ship.

"In another chapter, 'Large Area Coverage Trials', the MoD describes how between 1961 and 1968 more than a million people along the south coast of England, from Torquay to the New Forest, were exposed to bacteria including e.coli and bacillus globigii, which mimics anthrax. These releases came from a military ship, the Icewhale, anchored off the Dorset coast, which sprayed the micro-organisms in a five to 10-mile radius."

The air releases were at 500 feet, not 30,000
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


[link to www.whale.to]

One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population. The chemical drifted miles inland, its fluorescence allowing the spread to be monitored. In another trial using zinc cadmium sulphide, a generator was towed along a road near Frome in Somerset where it spewed the chemical for an hour.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36419852


There is no evidence that when this test was performed, it resulted in trails anything like the ones we see today. You people make so many assumptions about so many things..

I see, "spray"..."airplanes"..


Must have something to do with "chemtrails".


Lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36419852
United States
04/02/2013 06:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Not assumptions. It took place, paid Shill.
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/02/2013 07:18 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
It is undeniable that certain things have happened in the past . . . the government and others have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar more than once and have NEVER been forthcoming with this information . . . it is not stupid or moronic to suspect THEY are capable of such covert actions presently . . . hiding2 . . . in fact, it is expected . . .
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/02/2013 07:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Atmospheric Analysis:  If Chemtrails EXIST they must have a purpose  . . . There are several speculative suggestions; however, I want through a logical process suggest the following:

1. The altitude that an aerosol is injected into the atmosphere determines its mission. . . .determines the area affected and therefore, the strategy and the scope of the people and/or agencies  involved . . . 

2. The altitude determines the airframe used and therefore the relative transportation cost of the effort . . . as long as we know the frequency of flights  . . . 

  A. If the flights are in the stratosphere, the mission is to suspend aerosols in the atmosphere as long as possible and to affect an entire hemisphere or the entire globe for some purpose . . . 

      Suggested missions:
        
        1) Altering the Albedo of the Earth . . . Reflecting short wave radiation back into space. . . .reducing the visible light reaching the surface . . . Promoting Global Dimming 
        2) Supplying a global medium that will interact with electromagnetic wave energy  . . . Blocking it, scattering it, enhancing it, forming a barrier that energy can bounce off of. . . . Used either as medium for an offensive weapon or defensive weapon or both. . . Could do the same for communications and visualizations. . . . For example holographs that can be seen by millions of people at the same time . . . 

   B. If the flights are below the stratosphere the target is likely to be a much more localized mission and . . .  the aerosols are expected to fall to the ground within minutes, hours or days  . . . Targeting Continents, Countries, Regions, Cities, Neighborhoods, etc. . . The higher the flights below the tropopause the larger the area targeted . . . As a crop duster only flies a few hundred feet in the air. . . To dust a few hundred acres . . .  chaff is normally injected at several thousand feet to cover a state size area or corridor to cover combat air operations  . . . Weather modification would also target similar altitudes to target optimal areas within the troposphere. . . . 
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
WindyMind

User ID: 7244814
United States
04/02/2013 07:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
I left my left over strawberry shortcake all in a bowl together in the fridge and it melted and it's ruined! ruined, I hope our entire planet isn't ruined.886

halbird2
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/02/2013 07:46 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Debunking the Debunkers first premise. . . .

WHY don't Chemtrails exist. . . Because there are logical explanations for what people see in the sky and people should accept these explanations because they have a long and accepted history . . . It is the simplest explanation, thereby, it should be accepted first until proven otherwise . . . All evidence to the contrary can be shown to be pure speculation and doesn't meet scientifically verifiable evidentiary standards . . .

1) All new concepts almost universally begin as speculation . . . Especially those that go counter to the prevailing mainstream opinions and established norms. .. 

2) Chemtrails are a conspiracy theory at this time. . . So it is logical to assume evidence is either limited or unaccepted by the mainstream. . . . Which doesn't make it false or invalid. . . .

3) The conspiracy is about the detection of the addition of tiny  amounts of pre-existing common substances into an ocean of similar substances which is the atmosphere . . . where millions of potential contamination sources exist . . A most difficult task to say the least 

4) Chemtrail believers have no leadership, organization or budget to attempt detection. . .so to mounting a well organized scientifically valid attempt at detection is problematic at best. . . 

5) No respected scientist or institution would dare to publicly  acknowledge or work with a group trying to prove chemtrails exist  . . .

6) If a covert atmospheric injection program exists . . . It is cloaked in secrecy by definition. . . .a problem few if no scientists have to contend with when engaged in scientific discovery. . . .

7) Debunkers' original premise of knowing "what people see" is speculation itself . . .because they cannot possibly know what everyone sees. . . .

coffee4
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/02/2013 07:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
1) Debunkers say they are simply, misidentified condensation trails from high flying aircraft in the sky . . . They are persistent contrails and contrail-induced cirrus cloud banks and disseminated haze. . . .

2) People became more aware of these persistent trails and cloud banks because they have increased significantly because of three main factors. . . . Along with significant scientific studies, publicity and curiosity by NASA, NOAA, DoE, and their British and European counterparts . . . Due to Global Warming all things atmospheric are now in vogue . . . 

      A.  Simply more air traffic. . . Increasing dramatically over the decades . . . Especially over certain air corridors 

      B.  In the last few decades the altitudes at which aircraft  . . . Especially long haul aviation has increased well into the 30,000 feet cruising altitudes making the likelihood that persistent contrail form statistically more likely  . . .

       C.  Engine efficiencies have increased from .20 to .30 and even higher over the last few decades  . . . Therefore, more and more efficient engines are being added every year. . . More efficient engines increase the relative humidity and lowers the plume temperatures of engine exhaust allowing persistent contrails to form in air that was suboptimal for such formation before. . . .

3) The above misidentifications happened due to lack of adequate atmospheric science awareness and the advent of alternative communication and information sources like the Internet, etc. Which created the proliferation of conspiracy mania. . . .

    A.  The publication of usually unknown and/or minimally known misadventures of the authorities has become sometimes viral. . . North wood Papers, Gulf of Tonkin incident, Watergate, 911 Conspiracy, etc. Failure and cover-ups from most institutions once trusted without question by most people now questioned by all . . . i.e. Sex scandals by the Church, the President, Congress, Presidential Candidates and celebrities . . .  Fraud by the financial, academic, medical, pharmaceutical and scientific institutions, the bail out on and on and on . . . 

   B. The hype from the Global Warming Advocates that something should and must be done as soon as possible. . . . Has skeptical people searching for alternative motives and gave fuel to the chemtrail advocates who jumped on every rational explanation for their position. . . 

   C. The media and entertainment industry through fiction, documentaries, and historical fiction has proliferated much concern about the potential demise of mankind . . . Further energizing the search to explain anything misunderstood . . . 

   D. The publication of well meaning but inaccurate or misinterpreted elevations of metallic ions in the environment such as Aluminum, Barium, etc. . . .these metals are very abundant in the natural environment and have multiple alternative sources which can concentrate dramatically due to: natural mineral deposits, disseminating winds, run off, acid rain, leaching, manufacturing, mining, transportation corridors, military activities, and agricultural practices, etc . . .

  E.  The existence of a few whistle blowers who appeared to give inside information but who have not been able to sustain through documentation or supportive evidence of anything but their own word or testimony. . . Their motives . . . Simply to fan the flames of mistrust . . . goodnewsshitstir2
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
WindyMind

User ID: 7244814
United States
04/02/2013 08:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
shitstir2

oops2

rex

886

halbird2
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/02/2013 08:16 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
edward Teller quotes . . . my candidate for the Father of applied Geoengineering . . . huffy

[link to www.brainyquote.com]


[link to www.wired.com]

Unlike many political conservatives in the late '90s, Wood and Teller took climate change seriously. But they doubted people would ever give up enough of their costly energy-consumption habits to prevent climate-associated risks (a cynical point of view that seems to have been borne out a decade later). Wood and Teller were just as dismissive of global greenhouse gas treaties like Kyoto as they had been of arms-control agreements during the '80s. They thought the only solution lay with technology: direct, aggressive intervention, either in the upper atmosphere or low Earth orbit, essentially to turn down the volume knob on solar radiation.
In Aspen, Wood didn't pull any punches. "He was being outrageous," Caldeira remembers with amusement. "He said something like, 'If we want to solve the global warming problem, we could just have a nuclear war.'" Even the title of his presentation was provocative: "Geoengineering and Nuclear Fission as Responses to Global Warming." By spending only about $1 billion per year, Wood argued, we could put enough particles in the stratosphere to reduce sunlight by about 1 percent — and that's all we'd need to start reversing global warming.

A fact is a simple statement that everyone believes. It is innocent, unless found guilty. A hypothesis is a novel suggestion that no one wants to believe. It is guilty, until found effective. 
Edward Teller 

Had we not pursued the hydrogen bomb, there is a very real threat that we would now all be speaking Russian. I have no regrets. 
Edward Teller 

I tried to contribute to the defeat of the Soviets. If I contributed 1%, it is 1% of something enormous. 
Edward Teller 

Life improves slowly and goes wrong fast, and only catastrophe is clearly visible. 
Edward Teller 

My experience has been in a short 77 years that in the end when you fight for a desperate cause and have good reasons to fight, you usually win. 
Edward Teller 

No endeavor that is worthwhile is simple in prospect; if it is right, it will be simple in retrospect. 
Edward Teller 

Teller
[link to www.fas.org]

Last Edited by George B on 04/03/2013 08:55 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
WindyMind

User ID: 7244814
United States
04/02/2013 09:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
886

halbird2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 36488183
United States
04/02/2013 09:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
...


It says proposed
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1645786



yeah...funny shit proposed.



snarl
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990


None of those tests have anything to do with contrails and most of those tests were done at ground level, like inside the underground tunnels or from a ship.

"In another chapter, 'Large Area Coverage Trials', the MoD describes how between 1961 and 1968 more than a million people along the south coast of England, from Torquay to the New Forest, were exposed to bacteria including e.coli and bacillus globigii, which mimics anthrax. These releases came from a military ship, the Icewhale, anchored off the Dorset coast, which sprayed the micro-organisms in a five to 10-mile radius."

The air releases were at 500 feet, not 30,000
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


[link to www.whale.to]

One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population. The chemical drifted miles inland, its fluorescence allowing the spread to be monitored. In another trial using zinc cadmium sulphide, a generator was towed along a road near Frome in Somerset where it spewed the chemical for an hour.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36419852


If you read the report it says the planes were at an altitude of 500 feet, not 30,000. They also sprayed from a ship, in the underground, and from a truck.

In short, this has nothing to do with contrails so is just a red herring.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
04/03/2013 01:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Not assumptions. It took place, paid Shill.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36419852


I never said it didn't take place.

My point is that there is no evidence that it as anything to do with the trails we now see in the sky, ignorant chemtard.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 30170064
United States
04/03/2013 02:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Debunking the Debunkers first premise. . . .

WHY don't Chemtrails exist. . . Because there are logical explanations for what people see in the sky and people should accept these explanations because they have a long and accepted history . . . It is the simplest explanation, thereby, it should be accepted first until proven otherwise . . . All evidence to the contrary can be shown to be pure speculation and doesn't meet scientifically verifiable evidentiary standards . . .

1) All new concepts almost universally begin as speculation . . . Especially those that go counter to the prevailing mainstream opinions and established norms. .. 

2) Chemtrails are a conspiracy theory at this time. . . So it is logical to assume evidence is either limited or unaccepted by the mainstream. . . . Which doesn't make it false or invalid. . . .

3) The conspiracy is about the detection of the addition of tiny  amounts of pre-existing common substances into an ocean of similar substances which is the atmosphere . . . where millions of potential contamination sources exist . . A most difficult task to say the least 

4) Chemtrail believers have no leadership, organization or budget to attempt detection. . .so to mounting a well organized scientifically valid attempt at detection is problematic at best. . . 

5) No respected scientist or institution would dare to publicly  acknowledge or work with a group trying to prove chemtrails exist  . . .

6) If a covert atmospheric injection program exists . . . It is cloaked in secrecy by definition. . . .a problem few if no scientists have to contend with when engaged in scientific discovery. . . .

7) Debunkers' original premise of knowing "what people see" is speculation itself . . .because they cannot possibly know what everyone sees. . . .

coffee4
 Quoting: George B


About #7..

Don't be stupid.

No one claims that they know what people see...

We claim that the chemtards don't know what they see..and are jumping to conclusions and making statements of fact about things they don't understand.

There is no evidence to the contrary, and evidence to support my claim in every chemtard video..even the long expensive ones, ever made.

#6, yet, the atmosphere would contain evidence, and someone would find it..,so far, nothing.

#5 bullshit assumption

#4 some chemtards have plenty of money, and prefer to make high budget chemtard videos featuring idiots who travel around the country to interview other idiots...instead of using the money to hire someone to take samples...probably because they don't trust anyone to do it.

#3 good luck with that!

#2 not false or invalid...just full of ignorant assumptions, paranoid speculation and outright stupidity. Oh, ok...false and invalid. Feel free to prove otherwise...chemtards have a 100% failure rate so far!

#1 chemtrails have been thoroughly debunked for a very long time. This isnt a new concept...it's old. But, give it another 80 years...maybe something new will pop up!
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 05:33 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
edward Teller quotes . . . my candidate for the Father of applied Geoengineering . . . huffy

[link to www.brainyquote.com]


[link to www.wired.com]

Unlike many political conservatives in the late '90s, Wood and Teller took climate change seriously. But they doubted people would ever give up enough of their costly energy-consumption habits to prevent climate-associated risks (a cynical point of view that seems to have been borne out a decade later). Wood and Teller were just as dismissive of global greenhouse gas treaties like Kyoto as they had been of arms-control agreements during the '80s. They thought the only solution lay with technology: direct, aggressive intervention, either in the upper atmosphere or low Earth orbit, essentially to turn down the volume knob on solar radiation.
In Aspen, Wood didn't pull any punches. "He was being outrageous," Caldeira remembers with amusement. "He said something like, 'If we want to solve the global warming problem, we could just have a nuclear war.'" Even the title of his presentation was provocative: "Geoengineering and Nuclear Fission as Responses to Global Warming." By spending only about $1 billion per year, Wood argued, we could put enough particles in the stratosphere to reduce sunlight by about 1 percent — and that's all we'd need to start reversing global warming.

A fact is a simple statement that everyone believes. It is innocent, unless found guilty. A hypothesis is a novel suggestion that no one wants to believe. It is guilty, until found effective. 
Edward Teller 

Had we not pursued the hydrogen bomb, there is a very real threat that we would now all be speaking Russian. I have no regrets. 
Edward Teller 

I tried to contribute to the defeat of the Soviets. If I contributed 1%, it is 1% of something enormous. 
Edward Teller 

Life improves slowly and goes wrong fast, and only catastrophe is clearly visible. 
Edward Teller 

My experience has been in a short 77 years that in the end when you fight for a desperate cause and have good reasons to fight, you usually win. 
Edward Teller 

No endeavor that is worthwhile is simple in prospect; if it is right, it will be simple in retrospect. 
Edward Teller 

Teller
[link to www.fas.org]

 Quoting: George B


More interesting info on the connection between LLNL, Teller and Geoengineering and SECRECY. . . .ohno

"In 1990, a year short of his doctorate, Caldeira went to Leningrad to study with Russian climate scientist Mikhail Budyko, one of the first champions of geoengineering. In the 1970s, Budyko had suggested an early version of the basic Teller-Wood idea — decrease the global temperature by shooting sunlight-scattering particles into the stratosphere. While he was in Leningrad, Caldeira's philosophical outlook still predisposed him to distrust such interventions, but years later that would change.

In 1993, the former peace activist accepted a research post at that haven of bombmakers, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Caldeira was running high-powered computer models to study the climate, but when he was offered a security clearance that would have allowed fuller access to the lab's resources, he tried to stay true to his old principles by declining. As a result, he didn't see much of Wood. "There's an outer fence at Livermore, and then there's an inner fence," Caldeira says. "Lowell worked inside the fence."


[link to www.wired.com]

Last Edited by George B on 04/03/2013 08:55 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 05:41 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
So bottom-line there is significant circumstantial evidence that there are official secrets within the geoengineering and climate control research apparatus at LLNL going back to the same group who first computer modeled the effects of global warming and those who did the atomic research and research on SDI (Star Wars) . . . goodnews

Last Edited by George B on 04/03/2013 05:42 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 05:55 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Feb 2013 sky1
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 06:08 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
So if an Intentional COVERT Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program were initiated . . . would we know it or detect it . . . ? Especially when designed and managed by the same people who brought us the Manhattan Project and SDI. . . .??

Since it could be accomplished through a slow build up over months or even years to increase the earth 's albedo by only ONE percent. . . .hiding2

"In Aspen, Wood didn't pull any punches. "He was being outrageous," Caldeira remembers with amusement. "He said something like, 'If we want to solve the global warming problem, we could just have a nuclear war.'" Even the title of his presentation was provocative: "Geoengineering and Nuclear Fission as Responses to Global Warming." By spending only about $1 billion per year, Wood argued, we could put enough particles in the stratosphere to reduce sunlight by about 1 percent — and that's all we'd need to start reversing global warming."
[link to www.wired.com]

Last Edited by George B on 04/03/2013 06:10 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1211465
United States
04/03/2013 06:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
:Feb 2013 sky1:
 Quoting: George B


What are you suggesting with this image?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1211465
United States
04/03/2013 06:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
So if an Intentional COVERT Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program were initiated . . . would we know it or detect it . . . ? Especially when designed and managed by the same people who brought us the Manhattan Project and SDI. . . .??

Since it could be accomplished through a slow build up over months or even years to increase the earth 's albedo by only ONE percent. . . .hiding2

"In Aspen, Wood didn't pull any punches. "He was being outrageous," Caldeira remembers with amusement. "He said something like, 'If we want to solve the global warming problem, we could just have a nuclear war.'" Even the title of his presentation was provocative: "Geoengineering and Nuclear Fission as Responses to Global Warming." By spending only about $1 billion per year, Wood argued, we could put enough particles in the stratosphere to reduce sunlight by about 1 percent — and that's all we'd need to start reversing global warming."
[link to www.wired.com]
 Quoting: George B


And what does this have to do with "chemtrails"?

Chemtrails are the visible trails in all the chemtard video images and videos.

In case you didn't know.

What YOU are referring to is another subject that you seem to meld/link-to the chemtrail hoax for some reason.

What you are referring to doesn't require any visible trails whatsoever.

I think that, as you have stated, you understand that you have NO WAY of proving your individual theory about geoengineering/global warming mitigation, and such...so you piggyback your particular theory onto the "chemtrail" theory so that IF someone were to actually research the subject (which they do...continuously....not easily found through Google searches) you can use findings to support your little sub-theory.

But, at the same time, you are being disingenuous with your chemtard friends...because you full well know that the images/videos of trails they show are likely to be nothing more than contrails. And there is no evidence that they are anything else.

You are trying to USE these people to help spread your particular brand of "chemtrails" which has NOTHING to do with the "chemtrail" theory and what it's about!

Rather impressive Jorge...
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 07:12 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Feb 2013 sky1
 Quoting: George B


What are you suggesting with this image?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


Just an interesting sky. . . .coffee4
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 07:21 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
So if an Intentional COVERT Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program were initiated . . . would we know it or detect it . . . ? Especially when designed and managed by the same people who brought us the Manhattan Project and SDI. . . .??

Since it could be accomplished through a slow build up over months or even years to increase the earth 's albedo by only ONE percent. . . .hiding2

"In Aspen, Wood didn't pull any punches. "He was being outrageous," Caldeira remembers with amusement. "He said something like, 'If we want to solve the global warming problem, we could just have a nuclear war.'" Even the title of his presentation was provocative: "Geoengineering and Nuclear Fission as Responses to Global Warming." By spending only about $1 billion per year, Wood argued, we could put enough particles in the stratosphere to reduce sunlight by about 1 percent — and that's all we'd need to start reversing global warming."
[link to www.wired.com]
 Quoting: George B


And what does this have to do with "chemtrails"?

Chemtrails are the visible trails in all the chemtard video images and videos.

In case you didn't know.

What YOU are referring to is another subject that you seem to meld/link-to the chemtrail hoax for some reason.

What you are referring to doesn't require any visible trails whatsoever.

I think that, as you have stated, you understand that you have NO WAY of proving your individual theory about geoengineering/global warming mitigation, and such...so you piggyback your particular theory onto the "chemtrail" theory so that IF someone were to actually research the subject (which they do...continuously....not easily found through Google searches) you can use findings to support your little sub-theory.

But, at the same time, you are being disingenuous with your chemtard friends...because you full well know that the images/videos of trails they show are likely to be nothing more than contrails. And there is no evidence that they are anything else.

You are trying to USE these people to help spread your particular brand of "chemtrails" which has NOTHING to do with the "chemtrail" theory and what it's about!

Rather impressive Jorge...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I have continually POSTED over and over that visibility has nothing to do with an aerosol injection program and that persistent trails in the sky are most assuredly persistent contrails and contrail induced cirrus cloud banks. huffy. . . . . .I am hiding nothing. . . .however, that being said, to suggest that the people who run the show are not capable and willing ( if they thought it necessary ) to engage in geoengineering is false. . . . and it would be very difficult to detect if done properly. . . .

Last Edited by George B on 04/03/2013 07:22 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 07:35 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Visibility does, however, correlate with trapping long wave solar radiation (positive radiative forcing) . . . and thus increasing global warming potential . . . . which is contrary to the goal of reducing global warming potential. . . and would be opposite of the normal goals of geoengineering. . . .

huffy

Radiative Forcin
[link to spie.org]

Last Edited by George B on 04/04/2013 08:38 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1211465
United States
04/03/2013 08:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
So if an Intentional COVERT Atmospheric Aerosol Injection Program were initiated . . . would we know it or detect it . . . ? Especially when designed and managed by the same people who brought us the Manhattan Project and SDI. . . .??

Since it could be accomplished through a slow build up over months or even years to increase the earth 's albedo by only ONE percent. . . .hiding2

"In Aspen, Wood didn't pull any punches. "He was being outrageous," Caldeira remembers with amusement. "He said something like, 'If we want to solve the global warming problem, we could just have a nuclear war.'" Even the title of his presentation was provocative: "Geoengineering and Nuclear Fission as Responses to Global Warming." By spending only about $1 billion per year, Wood argued, we could put enough particles in the stratosphere to reduce sunlight by about 1 percent — and that's all we'd need to start reversing global warming."
[link to www.wired.com]
 Quoting: George B


And what does this have to do with "chemtrails"?

Chemtrails are the visible trails in all the chemtard video images and videos.

In case you didn't know.

What YOU are referring to is another subject that you seem to meld/link-to the chemtrail hoax for some reason.

What you are referring to doesn't require any visible trails whatsoever.

I think that, as you have stated, you understand that you have NO WAY of proving your individual theory about geoengineering/global warming mitigation, and such...so you piggyback your particular theory onto the "chemtrail" theory so that IF someone were to actually research the subject (which they do...continuously....not easily found through Google searches) you can use findings to support your little sub-theory.

But, at the same time, you are being disingenuous with your chemtard friends...because you full well know that the images/videos of trails they show are likely to be nothing more than contrails. And there is no evidence that they are anything else.

You are trying to USE these people to help spread your particular brand of "chemtrails" which has NOTHING to do with the "chemtrail" theory and what it's about!

Rather impressive Jorge...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I have continually POSTED over and over that visibility has nothing to do with an aerosol injection program and that persistent trails in the sky are most assuredly persistent contrails and contrail induced cirrus cloud banks. huffy. . . . . .I am hiding nothing. . . .however, that being said, to suggest that the people who run the show are not capable and willing ( if they thought it necessary ) to engage in geoengineering is false. . . . and it would be very difficult to detect if done properly. . . .
 Quoting: George B


Then why are you calling whatever it is you are worried about "chemtrails" when you KNOW it's the persistent contrails these people are talking about!

Why aren't you making geoengineering/global warming mitigation threads?! You are in the wrong section...so you suggest...even though your polls seems to suggest it's the VISIBLE trails you are discussing with the chemtards!

Well, which is it?!

The chemtards are OBVIOUSLY referring to the VISIBLE trails in the sky!

I stick by my previous statement..you are using these people.

I never suggested that anyone was incapable of, or unwilling, to do anything. I'm just pointing out that these are separate, unrelated issues.

I do find it convenient that someone is "doing something" on a supposed global scale, which no one in the world is able to detect. I admit a lack of evidence doesn't ALWAYS mean nothing is going on...but, so far, it's a good indicator.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1211465
United States
04/03/2013 08:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Visibility does, however, correlate with trapping long wave solar radiation (positive radiative forcing) . . . and thus increasing global warming potential . . . . which is contrary to the goal of reducing global warming potential. . . and would be opposite of the normal goals of geoengineering. . . .

huffy

:Radiative Forcin:
 Quoting: George B


You're a fucking waffler....

You can't even decide what you are whining about...
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 08:46 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
Visibility does, however, correlate with trapping long wave solar radiation (positive radiative forcing) . . . and thus increasing global warming potential . . . . which is contrary to the goal of reducing global warming potential. . . and would be opposite of the normal goals of geoengineering. . . .

huffy

Radiative Forcin

[link to spie.org]

 Quoting: George B


You're a fucking waffler....

You can't even decide what you are whining about...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1211465


I don't think so . . . huffy

"1. Introduction
1.1 2009 is a key moment in the history of attempts to tackle the urgent threat of climate
change. New science suggests its impacts will be even more severe and felt far sooner than previously
anticipated. The window of opportunity for avoiding dangerous levels of climate change is closing
fast. All sectors have a responsibility to act and to act quickly to reduce their GHG emissions
substantially. Bunker fuels, including those from international aviation, are in no sense an exception
and must be brought into global GHG reduction plans and the UNFCCC Agreement in Copenhagen
in December 2009. GIACC alongside ICAO, its member states and industry and civil society
observers, has a solemn responsibility at this 11th hour to agree to effective proposals to this end.

2. Aviation’s contribution to radiative forcing is 4.9% of the global total and exceeds shipping
by 75%


2.1 ICSA’s presentation to GIACC/3 highlighted aviation’s contribution to climate change.
Since the meeting, new evidence has been published by Lee et al which updates the IPCC’s Fourth
Assessment Report (4AR), providing results based on operational data for 2005 (IPCC 4AR was
based on 2000 data). The report shows that global emissions of CO2 from air transport grew over 45%
between 1992 and 2005, reaching an estimated 733 million tonnes a year by the end of the period.
Between 2000 and 2007 alone, aviation traffic grew at an annual average rate of 5.3%, leading to a
38% increase in passenger traffic. The European Environment Agency (EEA) moreover estimates that
EU15 CO2 emissions from aviation grew 102% between 1990 and 2006. Lee et al calculated that the
CO2 and non-CO2 radiative forcing (RF) attributable to aviation in 2005 was 4.9% of the total RF when best estimates for the effects of aviation induced cirrus cloud formation are included (Lee et. al.
– see Appendix B). Without cloud effects, the figure was
3.5%. Estimates of total aviation RF(excluding cirrus) in 2050, using fuel usage growth factors of 2.7 to 3.9 over baseline year 2000, are 3 to 4 times greater than the 2000 value.


[link to legacy.icao.int]

Last Edited by George B on 04/04/2013 08:38 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 08:52 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
[link to legacy.icao.int]

In the future, contrail cloudiness and radiative forcing are expected to increase more strongly than global aviation fuel consumption because air traffic is expected to increase mainly in the upper troposphere, where contrails form preferentially, and because aircraft will be equipped with more fuel-efficient engines. More efficient engines will cause contrails to occur more frequently and over a larger altitude range for the same amount of air traffic. For the threefold increase in fuel consumption calculated for a 2050 scenario (Fa1), a fivefold increase in contrail cover and a sixfold increase in radiative forcing are expected. The contrail cover would increase even more strongly if the number of cruising aircraft increases more than their fuel consumption. For other 2050 scenarios (Fc1 and Fe1), the expected cirrus cover increases by factors of 3 and 9, respectively, compared to 1992. Higher cruise altitudes will increase contrail cover in the subtropics; lower cruise altitudes will increase contrail cover in polar regions. Future climate changes may cause further changes in expected aircraft-induced cirrus cover.slaphim
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B
George B (OP)
Extinct But Not Forgotten!

User ID: 19998253
United States
04/03/2013 09:20 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
speaking of sulfur;

[link to www.nytimes.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 5141990


Interseting . . . They are proposing to cut Sulfur content for automobiles from 300 ppm to 30 ppm now at a cost of 10 billion dollars to 10 pm for another 10 billion dollars. . . while the standard for aircraft is still 3,000 ppm. . . Why is that??? tounge

"
Charles T. Drevna, president of the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, the refiners’ main trade association, said the companies had in the last few years cut the sulfur content by 90 percent, to 30 parts from 300 parts, at a cost of $10 billion in capital improvements. He said that the proposed cut would cost another $10 billion. Because the process consumes energy, it will raise the carbon dioxide output of refineries.

Gasoline in the other 49 states can now have up to 30 parts of sulfur per million, and the proposed rule will be 10."
 Quoting: George B


Better lobby
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183


No doubt . . . that is a significant problem . . . while joe public scrapes his dimes together to drive his family to a family reunion . . . the more affluent gets protected by burning cheaper fuel flying on a business or holiday trip . . . while no one in the aircraft industry gives a damn about even the most rudimentary mitigation procedure to reduce global warming or the ugly trails
in the sky . . . huffy
 Quoting: George B


To make it even more complex . . . the sulfur content of jet fuel presently is too low to help increase sulfur injected into the stratosphere which would cool the planet but is also too high in sulfur content when injected into the troposphere to reduce the number and persistence of contrails and contrail induced cirrus clouds . . . the exact opposite strategy that should be followed in both cases . . . huffy another do

[link to www.patentstorm.us]

US Patent Application 20100122519 - ULTRA-LOW SULFUR FUEL AND METHOD FOR REDUCED CONTRAIL FORMATION

"0011]The gas turbine engine 20 utilizes an ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 to manage contrail formation from the gas turbine engine 20 while flying through contrail-forming conditions 32. Typical aviation fuels include 30-3000 parts per million of sulfur. However, the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 of the disclosed example includes a concentration of sulfur that is less than about one part per million to limit an amount of sulfur byproduct produced in the exhaust 28. In further examples, the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may have a concentration of sulfur that is less than 300 parts per billion or concentration that is below detectable limits (i.e., nominally zero). The sulfur byproducts (e.g., including SO3) may be in the form of particles, compounds, or other exhaust matter emitted in the exhaust 28.

[0012]Sulfur byproducts may act as nucleation sites for condensation of water under contrail-forming conditions. For instance, sulfur byproducts are highly hydroscopic compared to carbon or other particles in an exhaust. The sulfur byproducts, including any sulfur byproduct associated with emitted soot particles, attract water vapor molecules more readily than other types of particles in the exhaust. The sulfur byproduct may rapidly accumulate water and form droplets that lead to contrails. The amount of sulfur byproduct in the exhaust 28 is limited by utilizing the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30. The ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 thereby limits or eliminates contrail formation because there is limited sulfur byproduct in the exhaust 28 to support nucleation and water droplet formation."

NOTE: the present average sulfur concentration of jet fuel is around 300-500 ppm with an upper limit mandate of 3,000 ppm. . . while the proposed ppm for cars (at a cost of $20 Billion and increased energy costs to produce) is 10ppm . . .

Last Edited by George B on 04/03/2013 10:05 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

coffee4

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional, except for death and taxes . . . George B

News