If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?

If you are referring to the trails we all see in the sky, that is NOT evidence of "chemtrails". Sorry.

Provide it. All I have seen are lies, misconceptions, and ignorance.

I'm watching the sky being blanketed in "chemtrails" over Plano, TX as we speak. I will upload images tonight. There are huge, obvious differences between these and ordinary contrails. They take much longer to dissipate, spread out slowly and gradually, and are intentionally "criss-crossed" throughout the sky. Contrails on the other hand are nothing to worry about by any means.

Look up the formation of persistent contrails. They have been observed since the 1920s.

What is an "ordinary contrail"?!

That's the problem with you people...you make too many assumptions.

A contrail is a contrail, why are you being so picky on the wording?

ummm yes it is. Do some homework...this is stupid to even argue about.

I'm not being "picky".

When someone says "ordinary" contrail, I want to know what they mean by that. Because "ordinary" contrails come in many different varieties....

To claim that a trail which last only a few seconds is an "ordinary" contrail, is bullshit...and just plain ignorant!

Contrails can last for hours and be "ordinary".

They are ordinary PERSISTENT contrails, and have been around for over 80 years...

Also, criss-cross patterns have nothing to do with how "ordinary" a trail is either.

It's just an indication of atmospheric conditions within intersecting air routes.

These things matter.

Chemtards are spreading lies because they have fooled themselves into believing that they understand subjects they are absolutely clueless about.

I represent the truth...

Ummm...no it isn't.

Stop calling accepting everything you find on chemtard sites "homework"...it isn't.

yeah...funny shit proposed.

Well, let me upload images I have taken and you can hopefully explain to me exactly what this is. These trails are everywhere in Plano, TX and are continually being sprayed. I have never seen anything like this.

I thought "chemtrails" were bullshit until I saw this in person. I do not know for sure what the ultimate purpose of them is. Anyway, have a look for yourself. I took a shitload of pictures from various vantage points. I took 50 or more and I am in the process of making a video out of them.

I will make a new thread on GLP with my video and I will link it to you when it's finished.

In the meantime if you have an email I can send pics to you if you want to see my collection of pictures now.

Also, they look like the ones in the video above my post.

Hello Texas! You might want to see what your law allows in your area. Texas allows geoengineering/weather modification thru cloud seeding.

No one needs to prove anything to you. You shills are getting desperate.

dry air is not a conductor it's an insulator...how do you get air to cosistantly conduct electricity so your cell phone works all the time???? just add aluminum...it's pretty simple physics!!!!

Me and my wheaten terrier both have Morgellons symptons.

Aluminum in the air conducts electricity?

project cloverleaf? maybe what they are referring to?

Alerting electromagnetic wave transmission is one thing but conducting electrical current is quite another . . .

The use of cloud seeding is to produce rain, that is a weather event, not a climate event. The quote you provided is something they were dicussing but not implemented:

1. Introduction

Geoengineering ideas have been classified into two categories (Lenton and Vaughan 2009): (1) those increasing reflectance of solar radiation and (2) those increasing outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) by removing greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide. The geoengineering idea proposed in this letter fits in neither of these categories, although it would if category 2 were broadened by removing the restriction of greenhouse gas removal. The idea proposed is to cool surface temperatures by reducing the coverage of high cirrus clouds to increase OLR.

None of those tests have anything to do with contrails and most of those tests were done at ground level, like inside the underground tunnels or from a ship.

"In another chapter, 'Large Area Coverage Trials', the MoD describes how between 1961 and 1968 more than a million people along the south coast of England, from Torquay to the New Forest, were exposed to bacteria including e.coli and bacillus globigii, which mimics anthrax. These releases came from a military ship, the Icewhale, anchored off the Dorset coast, which sprayed the micro-organisms in a five to 10-mile radius."

The air releases were at 500 feet, not 30,000

You can't provide any evidence so you resort to insutls. How cute.

Not for you. Radio waves work just fine in a vacuum.

Wow....

[link to www.whale.to]

One chapter of the report, 'The Fluorescent Particle Trials', reveals how between 1955 and 1963 planes flew from north-east England to the tip of Cornwall along the south and west coasts, dropping huge amounts of zinc cadmium sulphide on the population. The chemical drifted miles inland, its fluorescence allowing the spread to be monitored. In another trial using zinc cadmium sulphide, a generator was towed along a road near Frome in Somerset where it spewed the chemical for an hour.

Weather is the day-to-day state of the atmosphere in a region, and its short-term (minutes to weeks) variation whereas Climate is defined as statistical weather information that describes the variation of weather at a given place for a specified interval. They are both used interchangeably sometimes but differ in their measure of time, and trends that affect them.
[link to www.diffen.com]

Weather vs climate...whatever.

Chemtrail, CHEMTRAILS, ChemTRails, CHEMtrails...

There is no evidence that when this test was performed, it resulted in trails anything like the ones we see today. You people make so many assumptions about so many things..

I see, "spray"..."airplanes"..


Must have something to do with "chemtrails".


Lol

Not assumptions. It took place, paid Shill.

It is undeniable that certain things have happened in the past . . . the government and others have been caught with their hands in the cookie jar more than once and have NEVER been forthcoming with this information . . . it is not stupid or moronic to suspect THEY are capable of such covert actions presently . . . . . . in fact, it is expected . . .

Atmospheric Analysis:  If Chemtrails EXIST they must have a purpose  . . . There are several speculative suggestions; however, I want through a logical process suggest the following:

1. The altitude that an aerosol is injected into the atmosphere determines its mission. . . .determines the area affected and therefore, the strategy and the scope of the people and/or agencies  involved . . . 

2. The altitude determines the airframe used and therefore the relative transportation cost of the effort . . . as long as we know the frequency of flights  . . . 

  A. If the flights are in the stratosphere, the mission is to suspend aerosols in the atmosphere as long as possible and to affect an entire hemisphere or the entire globe for some purpose . . . 

      Suggested missions:
        
        1) Altering the Albedo of the Earth . . . Reflecting short wave radiation back into space. . . .reducing the visible light reaching the surface . . . Promoting Global Dimming 
        2) Supplying a global medium that will interact with electromagnetic wave energy  . . . Blocking it, scattering it, enhancing it, forming a barrier that energy can bounce off of. . . . Used either as medium for an offensive weapon or defensive weapon or both. . . Could do the same for communications and visualizations. . . . For example holographs that can be seen by millions of people at the same time . . . 

   B. If the flights are below the stratosphere the target is likely to be a much more localized mission and . . .  the aerosols are expected to fall to the ground within minutes, hours or days  . . . Targeting Continents, Countries, Regions, Cities, Neighborhoods, etc. . . The higher the flights below the tropopause the larger the area targeted . . . As a crop duster only flies a few hundred feet in the air. . . To dust a few hundred acres . . .  chaff is normally injected at several thousand feet to cover a state size area or corridor to cover combat air operations  . . . Weather modification would also target similar altitudes to target optimal areas within the troposphere. . . .