|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
George B |
|
Post Content
|
...
All you can say is that there are secrets at LLNL. You cannot conclude what they are about
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 36488183 I think you can because it is highly probable. . . because Caldeira was doing climate computer modeling but was asked to apply for a security clearance but refuse to do so and was thus denied access to the inner circle of LLNL . . . so if his expertise was climate modeling it makes sense he was being denied classified climate information . . .  More interesting info on the connection between LLNL, Teller and Geoengineering and SECRECY. . . . "In 1990, a year short of his doctorate, Caldeira went to Leningrad to study with Russian climate scientist Mikhail Budyko, one of the first champions of geoengineering. In the 1970s, Budyko had suggested an early version of the basic Teller-Wood idea — decrease the global temperature by shooting sunlight-scattering particles into the stratosphere. While he was in Leningrad, Caldeira's philosophical outlook still predisposed him to distrust such interventions, but years later that would change.
In 1993, the former peace activist accepted a research post at that haven of bombmakers, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Caldeira was running high-powered computer models to study the climate, but when he was offered a security clearance that would have allowed fuller access to the lab's resources, he tried to stay true to his old principles by declining. As a result, he didn't see much of Wood. "There's an outer fence at Livermore, and then there's an inner fence," Caldeira says. "Lowell worked inside the fence." [ link to www.wired.com] ALBEDO ENHANCEMENT BY STRATOSPHERIC SULFUR INJECTIONS: A CONTRIBUTION TO RESOLVE A POLICY DILEMMA? An Editorial Essay ( LLNL) Researchers at the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory are so far the only ones who have modelled the stratospheric albedo modification scheme. In a first study, Govindasamy and Caldeirau (2000) simulated this by reducing the solar luminos- ity by 1.8%, to balance future climate warming by a doubling of CO2. Although solar radiative forcing has a different physics and spatial distribution than the in- frared effects caused by CO2, the model results indicated that the global temper- ature response by both perturbations at the Earth’ surface and atmosphere largely cancelled out. Although these preliminary model results would be in favor a strato- spheric sulfur injection operation, the required annual S inputs are large, so that the possibility of adverse environmental side effects needs to be fully researched before the countermeasure to greenhouse warming is attempted. What has to be done first, is to explore whether using a sulfur injection scheme with advanced micro-physical and radiation process descriptions will show similar model results as the simple solar luminosity adjustment scheme of Govindasamy and Caldeira (2000). Further studies, following those conducted by Govindasamy (2003), should address the biological effects of the albedo modification scheme. As already men- tioned, injection of soot may be an alternative, but in need of critical analysis. Such studies by themselves, even when the experiment is never done, will be very informative. Page 5 [ link to www.cogci.dk] I have not said that ( Climate studies does not mean the contrails we see are chemtrails.). . . . I have said Chemtrail Conspiracy Advocates have most likely misidentified persistent contrails and contrail induced cirrus cloud banks and the resulting haze as Chemtrails and you know it . . . 
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
