|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
Oh Jorge...I think you need to contact them right away! All the tools and man hours of study they have and they missed the critical information you inven....err, understand!
I think you should just continue to post crap on this conspiracy site and make polls for chemtards! You are performing a great service for your country, and all of mankind. By posting your opinions and beliefs on GLP!
You are a true hero Jorge!
They need YOUR input to "allow" them to consider the geoengineering possibility!
So, continue to preach to the choir on conspiracy sites....that s sure to help.
Jorge, have you ever asked any environmental or atmospheric scientists if they have considered this possibility?!
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064  Please . . . no mainstream, established scientist is going to entertain such a question . . . if they did they would be jeopardizing their careers . . . That's absolute bullshit George. And you know it. Go ahead Noble, if you are so sure . . . you ask one to comment on the data NOAA presented in 2011 about the increase in Sulfur aerosols in the stratosphere during the 2000s . . . Ask them if Geoeengineering efforts or CHEMTRAILS could have been a source . . . could they eliminate it as a possible source???  No, you ask them.. It's your fucking claim, now find someone to back it up! And no self respecting scientist is going to deal with some loser using the word "chemtrail". Because they know chemtards won't accept a word they say. And not being able to eliminate a source, doesn't make it the source!
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
