|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
If you believe chemtrails are real . . . what source of information has reinforced your belief most?
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
That wasn't your point...
Your point was that geoengineering couldn't be eliminated as a source.
Which, as you have pointed out, has nothing to do with persistence of the trail.
I'm referring to the fact that "chemtrails" isn't even a fucking word...so scientists ignore it...and the idiots who use it. They would, however, be well aware of unnatural (as well as natural) increases in aerosols in the atmosphere. That's what they do...study the atmosphere...not accept anecdotal bullshit it on conspiracy sites as fact.
I was also being sarcastic when I was calling you a "hero" for concentrating your pathetic efforts on a conspiracy site instead of asking an actual scientist what they know about increases in aerosols in the atmosphere.
Which, is the bottom line...
See how many who have actually studied the atmosphere give you the answer "geoengineering" ...or have an alternate explanation.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 30170064 Of course they are going to give an alternative explanation because no one has admitted to active geoengineering. . . . If anything scientists know which side of their bread is buttered on . . . they are not going to bite the hand that feeds them . . .  But, what is wrong with the alternate explanation, and how do you know the alternate explanation isn't the factual explanation? George, YOU are the one doing the suspecting, based on a lack of scientific data and experience. I see no reason to believe YOU over those whoa re actually educated to be actual scientists...in this field. But, don't worry...the other chemtards love your suspicious nature, accusations and assumptions. Alternative explanations are fine. . . .they are speculations as well. . . . or there would not be more than one alternative. . . . So, I guess it comes down to "world view" as to which "type" of explanation one will accept as truth. Chemtards, being the suspicious, paranoid, whiny losers they are will always choose the more disturbing explanation, while normal people will choose the more rational one...based on actual data/evidence...not some silly assumptions and ignorant speculation. But, by all means, go ahead and assume and speculate all you want. It's very entertaining. I have to wonder though... They say that those who see the worst in others, spend even more time seeing the flaws in themselves... I'm sorry about that George. Don't worry, the other chemtards still love you.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
