|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
PROOF that the Illuminati is protecting Oscar Pistorius: Chief investigator now is being accused of ATTEMPTED MURDER.
|
|
Poster Handle
|
simultaneous_final |
|
Post Content
|
...
1. Happens all the time. Where's the "Illuminati" connection? A pay-off here, a bribe there--no "Illuminati" required. This elusive "Illuminati" are not the only people with money or influence.
2. Wild dot-connecting. In retrospect, the poster is chilling. But do you mean to suggest that the designer of that poster somehow had foreknowledge of the shooting event? PROVE THAT!
3. Where is the evidence of that? And even so, it is a WILD insinuation to insist that Masons are invariably connected to the "Illuminati" and also that the "Illuminati" is surely linked to the Pistorius case. Count them--that's two wildly speculative claims.
4. More wild dot-connecting. Do you HONESTLY mean to suggest that Ridley Scott chose an actress who slightly resembled a murdered model that HADN'T EVEN BEEN BORN YET at the time the film was made????? You have slipped off into Insaneville, my friend.
And you have the nerve to call me "stupid". Not to worry--I don't think you're stupid. However, it's clear that you're ignorant of the definition of "proof" and, furthermore, it's obvious that you're fucking crazy.
Quoting: simultaneous_final Here's where I stop arguing with you because you have the intellect of a moth. I never said Ridley Scott picked Daryl Hannah for Blade Runner because she looked like a woman who wasn't even born, but the reasoning it's exactly the OPPOSITE. Reeva Steenkamp was brought into the social life of Pistorius because it would fit the symbolism of Blade Runner, since she looked like a young Daryl Hannah. Seriously are you 4???? Better you call mommy and daddy to help you here, because you alone is not holding any water. Oh boy, they did send in the baby-shill AGAIN...   Uhhh...your hypothesis is NO LESS ABSURD and NO LESS FOUNDED ON WILD DOT-CONNECTING. Seriously, where do you come up with this rubbish? Thirty year old movies are connected to recent murders just so the killer can get off the hook? What would be the use of any of that? The motive? If you were an attorney, you would be laughed out of the courtroom. But I don't see how you could even make it through a week of law school with you feeble attempts at reasoning. Do you really need excitement in your life THIS bad? Geez. Come back to reality. I never said the movie is connected the murder you dumbfuck! I said the SYMBOLISM behind the murder was extracted from the movie. How many crimes have been committed in the last 10 years or so, embedded with symbolism of Hollywood movies?? Why the fuck I'm arguing with this dual-neuron person??? Still, NO LESS ABSURD and UNPROVABLE. Think about what you're saying. You're not helping your case.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
