| Users Online Now: 2,049 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,579,701 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,300,483 | Threads Today: 620 | Posts Today: 12,844 |
| 06:43 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,049 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,579,701 | |
| Pageviews Today: 2,300,483 | Threads Today: 620 | Posts Today: 12,844 |
| 06:43 PM | ||
BREAKING: VA letters sent to veterans as Per 2013 NDAA !!!! | |
| TheTruthNeverLies Offer Upgrade  User ID: 28381736  United States02/23/2013 11:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1404507 United States02/23/2013 11:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34980639 United States02/23/2013 12:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35112396 United States02/24/2013 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| me777 User ID: 4083184  Canada02/24/2013 09:58 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation |  Subscribe to my blog: Exposing The Darkness End times headline news. Research and analysis of world events in light of Bible prophecy. [link to lionessofjudah.substack.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33167132 United States02/24/2013 10:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 24049598 United States02/24/2013 10:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BUMP....This should get more attention here on GLP. Isen't it illegal for the government to do this? Why are Replublicans not taking a tougher stance against this? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35112396 you may be new here ... there is no difference between D & R at the leadership level. it is similar to wrestling ... on stage they're enemies, off stage they're friends all professional politicians have sold their soul, it is a requirement, for if they did not they would never have ever been re-elected, or elected for that matter. take a moment and think about all they ways we are separated while Oz hides behind the curtain. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33838111 United States02/24/2013 10:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As of 2011 there were 21.5 million Veterens in the US. [link to www.infoplease.com] Now, if you figure that half of them are in no shape to resist (due to age, injury, disability ect..) that still leaves 10.2 million plus that have the knowledge they were trained with to resist - THAT IS WHAT THE .gov IS SCARED OF ! |
| Rudib770 User ID: 34564779 United States02/24/2013 11:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is increasingly becoming a tyrannical govt. under this fucking administration who are fucking traitors. It is time to put this shit to rest. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35016945 United States02/24/2013 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This provision only applies to veterans who are found to be mentally ill, AND whose veteran’s benefits have been legally placed in a guardianship due to incompetence. This story is being spread in a way that deliberately misleads his audience into thinking this rule is being arbitrarily applied to all veterans — and that is false. |
| mrmuffins69 User ID: 34492275 United States02/24/2013 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | As of 2011 there were 21.5 million Veterens in the US. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33838111 [link to www.infoplease.com] Now, if you figure that half of them are in no shape to resist (due to age, injury, disability ect..) that still leaves 10.2 million plus that have the knowledge they were trained with to resist - THAT IS WHAT THE .gov IS SCARED OF ! and those 10 million might train those who refuse to comply, shit is gonna hit the fan big time |
| mrmuffins69 User ID: 34492275 United States02/24/2013 11:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This provision only applies to veterans who are found to be mentally ill, AND whose veteran’s benefits have been legally placed in a guardianship due to incompetence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35016945 This story is being spread in a way that deliberately misleads his audience into thinking this rule is being arbitrarily applied to all veterans — and that is false. true but what is to stop them from saying that all of the veterans have ptsd? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 35016945 United States02/24/2013 11:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This provision only applies to veterans who are found to be mentally ill, AND whose veteran’s benefits have been legally placed in a guardianship due to incompetence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35016945 This story is being spread in a way that deliberately misleads his audience into thinking this rule is being arbitrarily applied to all veterans — and that is false. true but what is to stop them from saying that all of the veterans have ptsd? We're not talking about ptsd. You don't have your benefits placed in guardianship due to ptsd. We're talking serious mental illness. You support gunrights for the seriously mentally ill? |
| mrmuffins69 User ID: 34492275 United States02/24/2013 11:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This provision only applies to veterans who are found to be mentally ill, AND whose veteran’s benefits have been legally placed in a guardianship due to incompetence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35016945 This story is being spread in a way that deliberately misleads his audience into thinking this rule is being arbitrarily applied to all veterans — and that is false. true but what is to stop them from saying that all of the veterans have ptsd? We're not talking about ptsd. You don't have your benefits placed in guardianship due to ptsd. We're talking serious mental illness. You support gunrights for the seriously mentally ill? ptsd is a mental illness |
| mrmuffins69 User ID: 34492275 United States02/24/2013 11:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | from the official government page, [link to www.ptsd.va.gov] Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is a mental health problem that can occur after someone goes through a traumatic event like war, assault, or disaster. Last Edited by mrmuffins69 on 02/25/2013 12:21 AM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23766809 United States02/24/2013 11:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| MaryAlananB User ID: 35118977 United States02/25/2013 12:13 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 30311833 United States02/25/2013 04:23 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This provision only applies to veterans who are found to be mentally ill, AND whose veteran’s benefits have been legally placed in a guardianship due to incompetence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35016945 This story is being spread in a way that deliberately misleads his audience into thinking this rule is being arbitrarily applied to all veterans — and that is false. The Coburn amendment #3109 states that in order “to protect the Second Amendment rights of veterans” they must be deemed mentally competent so they may retain their right to bear arms. [link to occupycorporatism.com] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 33282340 United States02/25/2013 04:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well in some cases...I can see this being a good thing. I was refused entry into the Army at the last minute due to an injury that I didn't even know about until I started training to leave, my neighbor got sent. He saw combat once and went batshit crazy, got sent home shortly after. He's all whacked out on dope and xanax, doctor shops, has no life and lives in his parents basement now he's about 45, he wasted away to almost nothing and resembles a 4 ft. gremlin coming off a 15 year long crack binge. Its a shame, but no way in hell should this guy have a gun. I think he already sold his for some drugs, if they let him keep it even.. Or my other buddy who served his time and once he got home he would act normal around people on the street then walk up into his apartment where you could hear him screaming and throwing shit all night for no apparent reason? Dude went nuts too. |
| DataSponge User ID: 26774706 United States02/25/2013 06:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | BUMP....This should get more attention here on GLP. Isen't it illegal for the government to do this? Why are Replublicans not taking a tougher stance against this? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35112396 There are THREE Political Parties running Washington these days. Two are known traditional Political Parties, Democrats and Republicans. The third Political Party is an insidious parasite which has infiltrated and embedded itself within the two visible Political Parties. This third Party is the 'Socialist Progressive Party' and members generally (with the exception of Hillary Clinton) keep this fact from the public while clinging to traditional Party labels like Democrat or Republican. They are deceivers, liars and criminals. They now have gained both leadership roles and the controlling vote in both of the traditional Parties. Both the Democratic and Republican Parties are now effectively the 'Socialist Progressive Party' and it has control of our nation. The 'Socialist Progressive Party' owns all three branches of our Federal Government. That is why the White House ignores the Constitution, there is no Justice to be found in our Courtrooms and Congress has submitted to an enemy of the nation. |
| DataSponge User ID: 26774706 United States02/25/2013 06:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This provision only applies to veterans who are found to be mentally ill, AND whose veteran’s benefits have been legally placed in a guardianship due to incompetence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35016945 This story is being spread in a way that deliberately misleads his audience into thinking this rule is being arbitrarily applied to all veterans — and that is false. And you know this to be true... how? Where is the 'compelling evidence' to support your statement? I hope you are right, but I fear not. |
| DataSponge User ID: 26774706 United States02/25/2013 07:00 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This provision only applies to veterans who are found to be mentally ill, AND whose veteran’s benefits have been legally placed in a guardianship due to incompetence. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35016945 This story is being spread in a way that deliberately misleads his audience into thinking this rule is being arbitrarily applied to all veterans — and that is false. The Coburn amendment #3109 states that in order “to protect the Second Amendment rights of veterans” they must be deemed mentally competent so they may retain their right to bear arms. [link to occupycorporatism.com] Sounds like Mr. Coburn has things ass-backwards. The 'Second Amendment Right' is retained until such time a proper medical authority determines you are not mentally competent. The 'Second Amendment' only clarifies an inalienable right illuminated within the Constitution itself. A God Given Right. Last Edited by DataSponge on 02/25/2013 07:02 AM |
| DataSponge User ID: 26774706 United States02/25/2013 07:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well in some cases...I can see this being a good thing. I was refused entry into the Army at the last minute due to an injury that I didn't even know about until I started training to leave, my neighbor got sent. He saw combat once and went batshit crazy, got sent home shortly after. He's all whacked out on dope and xanax, doctor shops, has no life and lives in his parents basement now he's about 45, he wasted away to almost nothing and resembles a 4 ft. gremlin coming off a 15 year long crack binge. Its a shame, but no way in hell should this guy have a gun. I think he already sold his for some drugs, if they let him keep it even.. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 33282340 Or my other buddy who served his time and once he got home he would act normal around people on the street then walk up into his apartment where you could hear him screaming and throwing shit all night for no apparent reason? Dude went nuts too. My friend, for a minute consider what you have just stated. Due to your personal friendship with two lost individuals amoung over 21 million, you have concluded it reasonable to deny the rights of the remaining 21 million Veterans. No Law will stop your lost friends from obtaining a firearm if they desire one. Strive to see reality. Last Edited by DataSponge on 02/25/2013 07:15 AM |
| SteamrolledGobias User ID: 15716609 United States02/25/2013 07:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Corn Dog User ID: 34200787 United States02/25/2013 07:35 AM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Sorry but I have to call BS on Mr. Connelly. He says he has a letter, he needs to take a picture of it. This is not the first time Mr. Connelly has tried to get the vets of this country stirred up. For every action, there is a reaction. Why get the veterans reacting??? The govt doesn't need to get the vets revolting, the states are disarming the citizens very well. The pro-gun citizens are battling a very sneaky govt. Smoke & mirrors folks! |
