US and British plans to seize Syria's chemical weapons

The West has two choices: directly intervene themselves, install a no-fly zone and incur the wrath of the Russian fleet at Tartous or stay out and watch their failed coup led by a bunch of ragtag mercenaries with RPGs fail painfully and slow under the weight of the superior army, navy and air force belonging to the Syrian government.

Not a good situation.

Britain could supply Libya no problem with weapons and not Syria. Wonder what the agenda is. hmmmmmmmm let's see.

Other than Libya they want to redraw borders not only of one country but of several. That is why it is a war of attrition.

Problem: Syria with chemical/bio weapons. Syria is Iran's right flank. (Gaza is its left.) It needs to be neutralized.

Solution: Fund overthrow of gov't through rebels. Rebels seize some chemical weapons, giving justifcation for intervention. Foreign forces occupy Syria to stabilize. They neutralize all of the BIG chem weapons--those on missiles and deliverable by plane--and do their best with the smaller ones, knowing that some will get through.

Syria's WMD have now been taken out of action; the rebels will probably be betrayed by the West; sensible members of the former ruling government and military are brought in . . . yadda yadda yadda.

And then Israel attacks Iran.

Haha, rrrrrrriiiiiiiiiggggggggghhhhhhhhhhtttttttttttttttt.

We going in to get them weapons of mass destructions again folks

So, they are going to TAKE BACK the weapons we sold them?

Hey, the fuckers bought them, if the Malignants didn't want them to have them, then why did they sell them in the first place?

Why should we?, Russia and China cannot be trust.

If Syria chem goes off.. it will effect China and Russia.