Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,589 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 292,480
Pageviews Today: 399,216Threads Today: 96Posts Today: 1,882
02:45 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28563033
United States
02/24/2013 03:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
2 theorys.


she either stumbled upon something in canada that sparked an interest in cloaking technologies (she was into clothing) that led for her to investigate the hotel in hopes of finding more about invisible light agency, which she managed to stumble into .. and was silenced.

or

Its all an elaborate hoax by the light agency to create a phy-op and in fact she was just an actor, the video staged, the murder never happened, and the water was in fact poisioned with a deadly microbial toxin that will eventually turn the city of LA into a zombie flesh eating horde..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7843669


I believe you're second theory.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20115308


The second theory sounds closest to the truth but I believe the video is real and she was not acting. Whether she was actually put in the water supply or that's just an excuse I don't know. But her actions are to awkward and real to be an act.
DesinzitizedSleepWalk​er9978

User ID: 33296170
United States
02/24/2013 03:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
It is clear that someone familiar with that hotel KNOWS the elevator has a camera in it. Thats why we dont see her attacker. There were probable two attackers outside the elevator, one on each side which is why she went back IN and looked frantically for a phone or an alarm bell. Somebody purposely stopped that elevator from going anywhere...

So how the fuck come are yall coming up with invisible army boogie-man scenaarios?
I tell you that when the shit REALLY HITS THE FAN, some of you are Darwin-destined to die from pure unadulterated stupidity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20080583


if your mind is too feable to read the entire thread where we already proved the existance of a mysterous "invisible light agency" operating within this hotel who has a direct connection to Raytheon that manufactures metamaterials used in cloaking technologies with links to physics documents to prove it then you are the one whos winning the darwin award here..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7843669


clappa
phoenixe (OP)

User ID: 34782429
Germany
02/24/2013 03:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
It is clear that someone familiar with that hotel KNOWS the elevator has a camera in it. Thats why we dont see her attacker. There were probable two attackers outside the elevator, one on each side which is why she went back IN and looked frantically for a phone or an alarm bell. Somebody purposely stopped that elevator from going anywhere...

So how the fuck come are yall coming up with invisible army boogie-man scenaarios?
I tell you that when the shit REALLY HITS THE FAN, some of you are Darwin-destined to die from pure unadulterated stupidity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20080583


please read summary on page 6 and summary on page 11.
all links leading to our scenario provided there.
have a look and come back when you done your research :)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28563033
United States
02/24/2013 03:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
OP, people have tried repeatedly to add an element to this event. You asked the question this time, so here is your answer. People worship the SUN of God. The Sun changes polarity roughly every 11 years. The number 11 is very important to them. Multiples of 11 as well. Like 22,33,77. It is a Satanic number. I am by no means knowledgeable on such matters. GLP is full of people who have studied matters as these. 9/11/01 was not a random date. Nor was 11/22/64. That is why the word ritual keeps popping up on your thread. It is a likely element of the big picture.
 Quoting: leonine


I don't think anyone is diagreeing with that. We're just curious people that have the time to be curious and it's better than watching the tube. So far I've learned a heck of a lot tonight. That this was some ritual is kind of a given.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1634496
United States
02/24/2013 03:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
The person who hacked her twitter acct and posted the word SPEAKEASY is giving you a clue as to where the two of them would have been seen together.
 Quoting: pool


i agree,but instead of club or something,what abut a secretive/closed lip agency...kind of like this light one seems to be
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


SPEAKEASY is an older term which might explain the age and indicate the same person has been killing for a long time and they kept their familiar terms regardless of age.
 Quoting: pool


if we take the term Speakeasy literally - as an establishment that sold liquor we could look at one joint in town that would fit the description perfectly.
Cole's is a restaurant that looks out of place in Los Angeles. Its exterior has more of an East Coast feel to it -- the sidewalk is level but to get inside you have to walk down a 1/4 level or so down a ramp. It very much has the look and feel of what an old time speakeasy may have had in the Prohibition days.

it's the oldest restaurant/bar in the city - open since 1908.

If you go on Google Maps and punch in 118 East 6th street you will see what i mean. in fact, there's a film shoot taking place at the time Google photographed the restaurant. It's a 2 minute walk from the Cecil Hotel.

here's an example of the place (second Jackie Chan/V8 commercial on this video @ 0:22).
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7843669
United States
02/24/2013 03:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
2 theorys.


she either stumbled upon something in canada that sparked an interest in cloaking technologies (she was into clothing) that led for her to investigate the hotel in hopes of finding more about invisible light agency, which she managed to stumble into .. and was silenced.

or

Its all an elaborate hoax by the light agency to create a phy-op and in fact she was just an actor, the video staged, the murder never happened, and the water was in fact poisioned with a deadly microbial toxin that will eventually turn the city of LA into a zombie flesh eating horde..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7843669


I believe you're second theory.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 20115308


The second theory sounds closest to the truth but I believe the video is real and she was not acting. Whether she was actually put in the water supply or that's just an excuse I don't know. But her actions are to awkward and real to be an act.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28563033


Mabey.. what we have here is a mixture of theory 1 and theory 2


she finds the agency (posting a pic on her facebook of a guy in a biohazard suit falling next to a cat) signifies her facebook was either hacked by NSA who posted that or she posted that with foreknowledge about los angelos. as much as I want to believe the illuminati used her as a human sacrafice completing the ritual to unleash TB and she was captured by this agency in this swank hotel, I can't get over the fact her name matches the TB test name..

Its just to good for the plotline for me.. how is it someone who matches the scenario ends up at this place (unless it was preplanned).. I can't make therory 1 and therory 2 mesh together because of that one element.. her name.
phoenixe (OP)

User ID: 34782429
Germany
02/24/2013 03:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
No. She could not have done this accidentally or on purpose. The autopsy would have been able to determine the cause of death as drowning if that were the case. As it stands the autopsy results were inconclusive. Meaning it was impossible for her to have done this accidentally or on purpose. Water in the lungs is the first thing they look for. They can also tell if water entered the lungs while the person was still alive, or if the water entered the lungs after death.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35060264


thank you!!! ive been saying this all night just didnt spell it out as well as you!!!good job
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978



just to make it a statement, which should be valid in this thread from now on:

as being (not) said by the LAPD statement linked in summary on page 11:

if there would have been drowning or lack of oxygen as cause of her death, they would have known by now and no further examinations necessary.

so it must be something else.
something else means something she has not done to herself as in "she was killed" - before she got in that tank.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28563033
United States
02/24/2013 03:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
NO THIS IS THE CARD HE WAS LOOKING FOR

Thread: Help needed - Illuminati Card Game - "Illuminati University"

and this was his only other reply since 2010 and it was on a similar thread last night

Can't be first seal because we are already at the fulfilment of the 6th seal and got the long term announcement of the 7th seal (see Ex-SEAL-Sniper Murder on Feb. 2nd and Super Bowl 47 power outtage).

Namaste

Deckard666
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 35060264
Greece
02/24/2013 03:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
...



if she killed herself how did she get in tank?
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


Thank You.

Assuming she acted alone, Ms. Lam = 'Someone', she could easily have done this on accident or on purpose. Or drugged-up. The latch may have fallen shut behind her.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227




No. She could not have done this accidentally or on purpose. The autopsy would have been able to determine the cause of death as drowning if that were the case. As it stands the autopsy results were inconclusive. Meaning it was impossible for her to have done this accidentally or on purpose. Water in the lungs is the first thing they look for. They can also tell if water entered the lungs while the person was still alive, or if the water entered the lungs after death.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35060264


thank you!!! ive been saying this all night just didnt spell it out as well as you!!!good job
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


Thank you too! I just thought it needed to be said. I can't believe some are still considering it a possibility in light of the autopsy results.
phoenixe (OP)

User ID: 34782429
Germany
02/24/2013 03:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
OP, people have tried repeatedly to add an element to this event. You asked the question this time, so here is your answer. People worship the SUN of God. The Sun changes polarity roughly every 11 years. The number 11 is very important to them. Multiples of 11 as well. Like 22,33,77. It is a Satanic number. I am by no means knowledgeable on such matters. GLP is full of people who have studied matters as these. 9/11/01 was not a random date. Nor was 11/22/64. That is why the word ritual keeps popping up on your thread. It is a likely element of the big picture.
 Quoting: leonine


I don't think anyone is diagreeing with that. We're just curious people that have the time to be curious and it's better than watching the tube. So far I've learned a heck of a lot tonight. That this was some ritual is kind of a given.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28563033


...and: we still don´t have a valid date what happened when.

all we got is:
body was found 19-2-2013
and 11 people deceided to stay at the hotel.
no valid other number yet.

if someone has any, please reply via quote here! thank you :)
DesinzitizedSleepWalk​er9978

User ID: 33296170
United States
02/24/2013 03:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
No. She could not have done this accidentally or on purpose. The autopsy would have been able to determine the cause of death as drowning if that were the case. As it stands the autopsy results were inconclusive. Meaning it was impossible for her to have done this accidentally or on purpose. Water in the lungs is the first thing they look for. They can also tell if water entered the lungs while the person was still alive, or if the water entered the lungs after death.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35060264


thank you!!! ive been saying this all night just didnt spell it out as well as you!!!good job
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978



just to make it a statement, which should be valid in this thread from now on:

as being (not) said by the LAPD statement linked in summary on page 11:

if there would have been drowning or lack of oxygen as cause of her death, they would have known by now and no further examinations necessary.

so it must be something else.
something else means something she has not done to herself as in "she was killed" - before she got in that tank.
 Quoting: phoenixe


i agree....it said waiting for toxicology but that doesnt matter..say she has drugs in system,she still didnt die in there..at least to me
DesinzitizedSleepWalk​er9978

User ID: 33296170
United States
02/24/2013 03:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
...


Thank You.

Assuming she acted alone, Ms. Lam = 'Someone', she could easily have done this on accident or on purpose. Or drugged-up. The latch may have fallen shut behind her.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227




No. She could not have done this accidentally or on purpose. The autopsy would have been able to determine the cause of death as drowning if that were the case. As it stands the autopsy results were inconclusive. Meaning it was impossible for her to have done this accidentally or on purpose. Water in the lungs is the first thing they look for. They can also tell if water entered the lungs while the person was still alive, or if the water entered the lungs after death.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35060264


thank you!!! ive been saying this all night just didnt spell it out as well as you!!!good job
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


The autopsy was inconclusive. She was found with water in her lungs. Imagine she suffocated before she drowned. Would it not make sense the results were inconclusive? They can tell if the water entered the lungs(among other things) but they couldnt did they? My theory was that the latch was shut after she entered the tank, alive. She ran out of oxygen. The affects on the body between a struggling drowning death vs. an unconscious drowning death exist. Unconscious, implying she ran out of oxygen before she drowned.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227


valid point..but even if that were the case,she wouldve have not been dead and wouldve have gulped under water...like say she stayed above she wouldve passed out and then breathed under water,then drowned

Last Edited by DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978 on 02/24/2013 03:47 AM
phoenixe (OP)

User ID: 34782429
Germany
02/24/2013 03:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
The autopsy was inconclusive. She was found with water in her lungs. Imagine she suffocated before she drowned. Would it not make sense the results were inconclusive? They can tell if the water entered the lungs(among other things) but they couldnt did they? My theory was that the latch was shut after she entered the tank, alive. She ran out of oxygen. The affects on the body between a struggling drowning death vs. an unconscious drowning death exist. Unconscious, implying she ran out of oxygen before she drowned.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227


valid point..but even if that were the case,she wouldve have not been dead and wouldve have gulped under water...like say she stayed above she wouldve passed out and then breathed under water,then drowned
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


^^ this.

she did not drown in there and not die of lack of oxygen.
she was dead when she got in the tank.

besides that, if our findings connect well, i am sure the invisible stuff company has keys to the stairway up there and no one has to drag a dead body up the fire ladder.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 20754036
New Zealand
02/24/2013 03:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
Lam, from the book The Zelator:

'An example of this clever head knowledge may be seen in his choice of the name Lam which Crowley used of the so-called extraterrestrial being he encountered. The portrait which Crowley drew of this creature is well known, for it formed the frontispiece for one of his own works.

'Lam is a curious name. Why did Crowley give this creature the name Lam? we might ask. Being an esotericist, Crowley realized that for a word to take Spiritual root in a culture, it would be necessary to unite within it both the skies and the Earth. After all, this is precisely what happens when a farmer plants seeds - in former times, it was recognized that farmers had to take into account far more than merely the seasons; one had to take into account the phases of the Moon, and even the constellations.

'To create this powerful union in his seed-word, Crowley adopted an Arabic letter which, according to certain arcane Arabic literature, united the Heavens with the Earth. This letter, Lam, is the fifth in an Arabic amuletic charm, based on the opening of the Koran, called the Basmallah. Part of the overall significance of this choice is that the
Basmallah is used, either as a spoken phrase, or as a written charm, to hold back the 19 guardians of Hell.32 Lam is one of those "words of power" which are so highly respected by magicians, and which may be used by them to great effect.

'Crowley was aware of the need to choose a name which was linked both with the stars and with the Earth. Yet he also sought a formula - a Spiritual mechanism - which would keep back demons. This is of profound interest to us. Almost all black magical practices - when handled by the dark Adepts - attempt to make use of this triadic power.

In effect, the name Lam - with its three European letters - is a triple invocation. As with the spells in the Egyptian Book of the Dead, it attempts to present a formula for restraining a certain class of demonic guardians, in order to allow the soul to pass through the secret passageways which run between the stars and the Earth.

'The word Lam appears to have been constructed by Crowley to serve exclusively the egotistical principles — self-serving principles - which lie at the root of black magic. This contrasts with the rituals of the Egyptian book, which is designed exclusively to serve the sacred purposes of
initiation.'

--------------------------

Lam is also associated with the lowest chakra, and the wielder of the lightning-bolt.

"When a storm cloud discharges electricity to Earth, a small "leader stroke" zigzags toward the ground in about one one-hundredth of a second. Once it touches something-a tree, a pole, a barn or the ground- the electrical circuit is complete and a vast surge of electricity, the lightning bolt, roars up the path established by the leader stroke. Thus the lightning stroke generally goes from the highest object on the ground up to the cloud. It looks as if it happens the other way around-from the cloud to the ground. The human eye cannot follow the formation of a lightning stroke because it shoots skyward in about one-millionth of a second."

And then it rains...
DesinzitizedSleepWalk​er9978

User ID: 33296170
United States
02/24/2013 03:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.

^^ this.

she did not drown in there and not die of lack of oxygen.
she was dead when she got in the tank.

besides that, if our findings connect well, i am sure the invisible stuff company has keys to the stairway up there and no one has to drag a dead body up the fire ladder.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227


The coroner would've been able to call this^ right? But he did not.


an autopsy would tell you if she drowned conscious or unconscious..and AFTER the AUTOPSY they did not say she drowned so she did not drown!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 19679303
Greece
02/24/2013 03:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
...


Thank You.

Assuming she acted alone, Ms. Lam = 'Someone', she could easily have done this on accident or on purpose. Or drugged-up. The latch may have fallen shut behind her.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227




No. She could not have done this accidentally or on purpose. The autopsy would have been able to determine the cause of death as drowning if that were the case. As it stands the autopsy results were inconclusive. Meaning it was impossible for her to have done this accidentally or on purpose. Water in the lungs is the first thing they look for. They can also tell if water entered the lungs while the person was still alive, or if the water entered the lungs after death.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35060264


thank you!!! ive been saying this all night just didnt spell it out as well as you!!!good job
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


The autopsy was inconclusive. She was found with water in her lungs. Imagine she suffocated before she drowned. Would it not make sense the results were inconclusive? They can tell if the water entered the lungs(among other things) but they couldnt did they? My theory was that the latch was shut after she entered the tank, alive. She ran out of oxygen. The affects on the body between a struggling drowning death vs. an unconscious drowning death exist. Unconscious, implying she ran out of oxygen before she drowned.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227


As I said. If water was found in the lungs and found to have entered the lungs while the victim was still alive the cause of death would have been listed as DROWNING. If water was found in the lungs but found to have entered the lungs after death it would not be listed as the cause of death. It would indicate though that the body was submerged after the victim was already deceased. If she was in the tank alive as you theorize and ran out of air the cause of death would have been ASPHYXIATION(also easy to determine). Any attempts made by the victim to get out of the tank or efforts to get the attention of others for help , such as pounding on the side of the tank or clawing would leave bruising that would show up during the autopsy. There could also be visible marks on the inside of the tank.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32954227
United States
02/24/2013 04:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
...




No. She could not have done this accidentally or on purpose. The autopsy would have been able to determine the cause of death as drowning if that were the case. As it stands the autopsy results were inconclusive. Meaning it was impossible for her to have done this accidentally or on purpose. Water in the lungs is the first thing they look for. They can also tell if water entered the lungs while the person was still alive, or if the water entered the lungs after death.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35060264


thank you!!! ive been saying this all night just didnt spell it out as well as you!!!good job
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


The autopsy was inconclusive. She was found with water in her lungs. Imagine she suffocated before she drowned. Would it not make sense the results were inconclusive? They can tell if the water entered the lungs(among other things) but they couldnt did they? My theory was that the latch was shut after she entered the tank, alive. She ran out of oxygen. The affects on the body between a struggling drowning death vs. an unconscious drowning death exist. Unconscious, implying she ran out of oxygen before she drowned.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227


As I said. If water was found in the lungs and found to have entered the lungs while the victim was still alive the cause of death would have been listed as DROWNING. If water was found in the lungs but found to have entered the lungs after death it would not be listed as the cause of death. It would indicate though that the body was submerged after the victim was already deceased. If she was in the tank alive as you theorize and ran out of air the cause of death would have been ASPHYXIATION(also easy to determine). Any attempts made by the victim to get out of the tank or efforts to get the attention of others for help , such as pounding on the side of the tank or clawing would leave bruising that would show up during the autopsy. There could also be visible marks on the inside of the tank.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19679303


I can swallow that. Bruising, screams, pounding. The coroner is equally sure that she had no cause of death as he is sure there were not several causes of death. Is this correct? Yes. Its open game.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28563033
United States
02/24/2013 04:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
Holy Chinese post!

LA is all very corrupt. Coroner will say whatever he's told to say.
What we have is a video and a name
DesinzitizedSleepWalk​er9978

User ID: 33296170
United States
02/24/2013 04:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
Holy Chinese post!

LA is all very corrupt. Coroner will say whatever he's told to say.
What we have is a video and a name
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28563033


i hear ya batman
phoenixe (OP)

User ID: 34782429
Germany
02/24/2013 04:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
it is all about the way the coroner said what he said...

easiest answer would have been:
she drowned in there (..with most possible option: got in the tank by herself)
but she did not have signs of drowning, conscious or unconscious, so this was ruled out.

next best answer would have been:
she died of lack of oxygen (still with the option, she got in the tank herself)
he did not say that - because they ruled this out as well.
no signs in/on her body for that (eg if she was trapped, she would have marks from scratching the inner tank on her fingers, broken nails, rust under the nails and stuff)

what´s left after that:
she died, but with no signs from dying in the tank due to drowning (conscious or unconscious) or lack of oxygen.
so dying in the tank can be ruled out.

what´s left now:
she died. outside the tank. reason yet unknown. therefore tests of toxics (and other stuff..)
but died not long ago before she was put in the tank, as she would have been much more decomposed if her body would have been dead outside of water for longer time (like days, a week). being dead in water somehow conserves the body.
phoenixe (OP)

User ID: 34782429
Germany
02/24/2013 04:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
btw, i deleted the chinese spam post for our reading convenience.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 34643383
United States
02/24/2013 04:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
El is a lam(b)?

El is a word for God.

Lamb is the Lamb of God-- who was sacrificed for the sin of the world.

The dark kooks love word plays.

Was she a sacrificial lamb?
DesinzitizedSleepWalk​er9978

User ID: 33296170
United States
02/24/2013 04:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
it is all about the way the coroner said what he said...

easiest answer would have been:
she drowned in there (..with most possible option: got in the tank by herself)
but she did not have signs of drowning, conscious or unconscious, so this was ruled out.

next best answer would have been:
she died of lack of oxygen (still with the option, she got in the tank herself)
he did not say that - because they ruled this out as well.
no signs in/on her body for that (eg if she was trapped, she would have marks from scratching the inner tank on her fingers, broken nails, rust under the nails and stuff)

what´s left after that:
she died, but with no signs from dying in the tank due to drowning (conscious or unconscious) or lack of oxygen.
so dying in the tank can be ruled out.

what´s left now:
she died. outside the tank. reason yet unknown. therefore tests of toxics (and other stuff..)
but died not long ago before she was put in the tank, as she would have been much more decomposed if her body would have been dead outside of water for longer time (like days, a week). being dead in water somehow conserves the body.
 Quoting: phoenixe


yay
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32954227
United States
02/24/2013 04:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
it is all about the way the coroner said what he said...

easiest answer would have been:
she drowned in there (..with most possible option: got in the tank by herself)
but she did not have signs of drowning, conscious or unconscious, so this was ruled out.

next best answer would have been:
she died of lack of oxygen (still with the option, she got in the tank herself)
he did not say that - because they ruled this out as well.
no signs in/on her body for that (eg if she was trapped, she would have marks from scratching the inner tank on her fingers, broken nails, rust under the nails and stuff)

what´s left after that:
she died, but with no signs from dying in the tank due to drowning (conscious or unconscious) or lack of oxygen.
so dying in the tank can be ruled out.

what´s left now:
she died. outside the tank. reason yet unknown. therefore tests of toxics (and other stuff..)
but died not long ago before she was put in the tank, as she would have been much more decomposed if her body would have been dead outside of water for longer time (like days, a week). being dead in water somehow conserves the body.
 Quoting: phoenixe


Respect.
But that leaves no option. They did a toxicological analysis. So, she just happened to drop dead randomly and someone decided not to call the police, but instead, drug her body to the roof via fire escape and put her in the water tank?
DesinzitizedSleepWalk​er9978

User ID: 33296170
United States
02/24/2013 04:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
El is a lam(b)?

El is a word for God.

Lamb is the Lamb of God-- who was sacrificed for the sin of the world.

The dark kooks love word plays.

Was she a sacrificial lamb?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 34643383


looks that way maybe with it being done be elitist..at least imo
DesinzitizedSleepWalk​er9978

User ID: 33296170
United States
02/24/2013 04:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
it is all about the way the coroner said what he said...

easiest answer would have been:
she drowned in there (..with most possible option: got in the tank by herself)
but she did not have signs of drowning, conscious or unconscious, so this was ruled out.

next best answer would have been:
she died of lack of oxygen (still with the option, she got in the tank herself)
he did not say that - because they ruled this out as well.
no signs in/on her body for that (eg if she was trapped, she would have marks from scratching the inner tank on her fingers, broken nails, rust under the nails and stuff)

what´s left after that:
she died, but with no signs from dying in the tank due to drowning (conscious or unconscious) or lack of oxygen.
so dying in the tank can be ruled out.

what´s left now:
she died. outside the tank. reason yet unknown. therefore tests of toxics (and other stuff..)
but died not long ago before she was put in the tank, as she would have been much more decomposed if her body would have been dead outside of water for longer time (like days, a week). being dead in water somehow conserves the body.
 Quoting: phoenixe


Respect.
But that leaves no option. They did a toxicological analysis. So, she just happened to drop dead randomly and someone decided not to call the police, but instead, drug her body to the roof via fire escape and put her in the water tank?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227


they havent done toxicology
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32954227
United States
02/24/2013 04:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
it is all about the way the coroner said what he said...

easiest answer would have been:
she drowned in there (..with most possible option: got in the tank by herself)
but she did not have signs of drowning, conscious or unconscious, so this was ruled out.

next best answer would have been:
she died of lack of oxygen (still with the option, she got in the tank herself)
he did not say that - because they ruled this out as well.
no signs in/on her body for that (eg if she was trapped, she would have marks from scratching the inner tank on her fingers, broken nails, rust under the nails and stuff)

what´s left after that:
she died, but with no signs from dying in the tank due to drowning (conscious or unconscious) or lack of oxygen.
so dying in the tank can be ruled out.

what´s left now:
she died. outside the tank. reason yet unknown. therefore tests of toxics (and other stuff..)
but died not long ago before she was put in the tank, as she would have been much more decomposed if her body would have been dead outside of water for longer time (like days, a week). being dead in water somehow conserves the body.
 Quoting: phoenixe


Respect.
But that leaves no option. They did a toxicological analysis. So, she just happened to drop dead randomly and someone decided not to call the police, but instead, drug her body to the roof via fire escape and put her in the water tank?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227


they havent done toxicology
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


Touche.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 28563033
United States
02/24/2013 04:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
Chinese spam post actually talked about communist prime minister now in charge of chinas quarantine program and a thermal imaging device to tell if people have the fever from 2009 birdflu. His name was li changjiang and he was also running companies around the world that were electronically manipulating markets.
Scary!!!! Quarantine program? China owns us ya know!! And everything in our houses now come from there. :(
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 870381
Australia
02/24/2013 04:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
Here's one that actually makes a sentence:

Alms a Lie

[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 32791400
United States
02/24/2013 04:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
Did anybody else happen to see this?

If you pause the hotel elevator video at 2:10, you can see Elisa making an X sign with her index fingers, WARNING as in "sTAY AWAY" or "GET BACK"!

hiding

News