Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,415 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 247,659
Pageviews Today: 404,800Threads Today: 128Posts Today: 2,323
05:53 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject New Update what Media is not telling us ! - Elisa Lam case - please, take a look at this! i feel this should not be ignored. thank you.
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
...




No. She could not have done this accidentally or on purpose. The autopsy would have been able to determine the cause of death as drowning if that were the case. As it stands the autopsy results were inconclusive. Meaning it was impossible for her to have done this accidentally or on purpose. Water in the lungs is the first thing they look for. They can also tell if water entered the lungs while the person was still alive, or if the water entered the lungs after death.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 35060264


thank you!!! ive been saying this all night just didnt spell it out as well as you!!!good job
 Quoting: DesinzitizedSleepWalker9978


The autopsy was inconclusive. She was found with water in her lungs. Imagine she suffocated before she drowned. Would it not make sense the results were inconclusive? They can tell if the water entered the lungs(among other things) but they couldnt did they? My theory was that the latch was shut after she entered the tank, alive. She ran out of oxygen. The affects on the body between a struggling drowning death vs. an unconscious drowning death exist. Unconscious, implying she ran out of oxygen before she drowned.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 32954227


As I said. If water was found in the lungs and found to have entered the lungs while the victim was still alive the cause of death would have been listed as DROWNING. If water was found in the lungs but found to have entered the lungs after death it would not be listed as the cause of death. It would indicate though that the body was submerged after the victim was already deceased. If she was in the tank alive as you theorize and ran out of air the cause of death would have been ASPHYXIATION(also easy to determine). Any attempts made by the victim to get out of the tank or efforts to get the attention of others for help , such as pounding on the side of the tank or clawing would leave bruising that would show up during the autopsy. There could also be visible marks on the inside of the tank.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 19679303


I can swallow that. Bruising, screams, pounding. The coroner is equally sure that she had no cause of death as he is sure there were not several causes of death. Is this correct? Yes. Its open game.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP