Large UNIDENTIFIED object approaching EARTH ~ Visible NOW on Stereo Ahead HI1 ~ IS it THIS Blue object NOW VISIBLE in our skies??

Ok dude

Source the lens flare

Explain the repeated position and independent
Movement shown

Damn pot junkies!!!

I thought that too, BUT, I have seen this same object (but smaller, farther away) several months ago with my own eyes. It doesn't matter if you believe me or not, I'm just passing this info along.

Start at 20:00 mins. Blow it up to full screen, increase the quality as high as you can get it... you can see that it doesn't change brightness at all, which I find unvbelievable for a natural obeject. The smoke passes behind it.

Notice how many days it does get blocked

Your not seeing with your eyes

Your seeing through a camera lens

It's around 17:00 on the video. Clouds roll over it several times, it doesn't affect the spot at all.

Post specific images and/or timestamps or I will automatically disregard it as spamming for yowusa



well it is long and boring, yet somehow satisfactory and compelling. the whole POINT of it is that it is ALL from the same cam, many different dates, no static pics that can be photoshopped, even an old pic from two years ago showing the object appears below the ecliptic and then two years later it is above the ecliptic.

the videos also seem to show it moving over the mountains, so it is not stationary in the same spot. I may have to watch it again as I skimmed it the first time as masters is rather boring in his presentation.

the only part that did throw me off was the seemingly appearance of the object in what should have been heavy cover from the volcano, as in in front of the smoke not behind as some distant space object would be.


however, there are also many of the videos where the object is covered up by cloud cover.


refusing to look at evidence that you don't like and appearing snittish about is childish, and extremely unscientific, at least in the ideal.

cussing people out left right and center is also immature in the extreme, so I very much doubt this person is the scientist he claims to be.

anyway, as another poster said, this is the best most compelling evidence I've seen of an object in the sky from a cam or camera since the old leder years.

this one shows continuity and change over a long period of time.

interesting, I may have to let my "amateur scientific" curiosity out again and take another look.

Did you see it from the same location where this video was shot? I am not saying you did not see anything. I am saying this is a lens flare. I have seen strange things in the sky myself.

So if I video the sun and put it on YouTube it isn't there?


You misunderstood my asking
awww cant be bothered
read what i said to other poster
this is getting seriously retarded now
When we are old and reflect on these times, we will be laughing.



lol at reflecting back on your times at glp get a life bruh


Thats actually very observant of you. Since losing my Job sometimes log on all day or night just to fill the gaps.

Thank you!

Well said

Many points well made in the video that answer
many of the concerns being raised.

I am not going to waste my time to prove out points made
in the video for those that refuse to watch it.

If you watch the complete video and believe lens flare
had those characteristics shown then we have lots to
Talk about.

Another lens flare. It's not going to move "with the ecliptic," and it doesn't matter if the sun's in the field of view or not (I thought we just learned that RE: earth in HI1). It always appears in the same lens flare line with the sun though (the dimmer parts of the flare line can sometimes be harder to see, but clouds over the mountain while the sun is relative unobscured make for the best view of the entire flare line):
[link to i319.photobucket.com]
Notice too that it appears in front of the clouds around the volcano. It's not dimmed or blurred by those clouds, if anything it's enhanced because of better contrast than with the blue sky.

No, it wasn't the same location. I talked to some people in the southern hemisphere that were seeing it and they told me by then I could view in in the northern hemisphere, this was several months ago. I had to get up very early in the morning to see it.

It was big and bright and distinctly had a semi halfish cresent shape, but was a bit smaller (farther away) than in this video. It also had some orbiting bodies. I have very high powered binoculars to confirm what I saw with my eyes.

Now that's why the video has me surprized. I am going to keep an eye on this, if I am able to between the clouds and chemtrails. I don't know for sure what it is, but the big question is - is it coming closer, or not? I am going to stay tuned....

Better quality grayscale gif of the same lens flares:
[link to i319.photobucket.com]

Thanks for watching it

Your verdict

Lens flare.


Got it

Now the case for it not being lens flare

I've been reading Astro's posts for years on here. He always has the same approach....always debunks everything. He is a pro at shilling & probably gets paid big bucks for doing it. In this thread he weaves a magical scenario with words to explain a lens flare, leaving the reader scratching their head with confusion. You know....like a person who talks a lot, but actually says nothing of any value. Truth is, he is clueless as to what that object/phenomena is but his Ego cannot allow him to admit it, plus his master is cracking the whip over his shoulder to dismiss any possible evidence of it being a legitimate object. It's very entertaining watching the shills do their thing & ass kissers who follow them around.

any other videos from other sources showing this? anyone?

Could be a ufo sitting in front of the clouds, or a weather balloon, but I seriously doubt it; it would be rather unusual for either one of those to be hanging about in the exact same line of lens flares day after day.

Wow. If that doesn't end the debate what could?

So have you ever stopped to think that any lense flares in the specific photo that you provided, are reflecting off of the object itself?

AND in other takes the sun is in a different position in the sky, but the object is in the same place. Just sayin'.

i do really believe there are shills, but most of the time someone is accused of it, they are simply being called it for having a different opinion.

Just because I talk over your head does not mean I say nothing of value. If I said nothing of value and did not actually know what I was talking about, it would be quite impossible for me to produce something like this that actually worked, don't you agree?
Thread: Calculating the Position and Orientation of the Moon Part 2: Astrometric Validation

Oh bullshit. Where there are questions, people search for answers.

Anyone calling this Dr. Astro guy a shill based on this thread should man up and apologize at this point. He just f'ed everyone trying to say this is not a lens flare simultaneously and did not give a reach around.

Cart before the horse. It's up to you to show that there is some unknown object present.

Not exactly. It's in a slightly different place, and always exactly in line with the more distant lens flares (which due to it being a line always pointing at the sun, move more than the one closer to the sun).

LOL! Thank you!

1st question

Seems lens flare would happened daily

not only 4 or 5 times monthly